Jump to content
SAU Community

Autocar Review. Gt-r Vs The M3 Vs Gt3


Recommended Posts

This is probably the best and honest review so far.

Everyone has a cry and says the GT3 is a better competitor to the GT-R then the 911TT. Well here's a test between them.

Part 1. http://www.autocar.co.uk/VideosWallpapers/...231443&CT=V

Part 2. http://www.autocar.co.uk/VideosWallpapers/...231444&CT=V

Thanks for posting those links.

Absolutely great to watch and just unbelievable to see what the R35 GTR is capable of. This is a truely amazing car.

I love his quote about it being 'a mini Veyron'.

Cheers.

Nissan dropped the 'Skyline' tag, as Inifinity now use it for their coupes and sedans...

Nissan confirmed that the R35 is simply, the Nissan GTR...

Actually it's spelt Infiniti and they do not use the Skyline badge at all. The Infinitis are G35 and G37's. The Skyline is alive and well though in Japan with the new V36's.

makes me wonder about the tunning industry and what they can get out the the vr38, cant wait till it gets released here in AUS, by then the jap would have very nice parts ready for us :banana:

"make me wonder why i bought the M3" LOL with reviews like this im sure poka's and bemmers will be more extreme in the future. f**k the worlds oil supply, we are going to have a "BIG automotive" world war

Edited by philta

wow... 3.8 60's with a piss weak lauch and two people in the car must be around 1850 or more of weight that the 3.8 TT is hammering to those speeds.

one word impressive

I like how he kept saying 'real world performance' to refer to his way of testing also :banana:

Nissan dropped the 'Skyline' tag, as Inifinity now use it for their coupes and sedans...

Nissan confirmed that the R35 is simply, the Nissan GTR...

Lets face it, as far as Nissans go the GTR badge will always be associated with the Skyline brand.

...........for a company that used to be called DATSUN.........and its now making cars that is as good as a 911 Porka.........

CLASSIC

Yeah, how narrow minded are these car jurno's hey... what a tool.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...