Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Hey Mr Penlington

Well considering your car can do a 1.04 at Wakey, it will have no problems doing a 14 or even a 13 at the GP as I think it would be much better suited to Oran compared to Wakey.

No mjor change to Loftys GTR from wakey to the GP. Did the 15 at the GP on a good track and the 1.06 at wakey on a not so good track. The car should do a 1.05 at wakey. Remember these times are done with 27mm restrictors sitting in front of each turbo!! Should be good to see this thing go once the restrictors are removed and allowed to rev past 6,000rpm. The first round of IPRA is in a few weeks at wakey and the boys at BSM have been busy tweaking the car to make it go a little better this year.

I won't rule out driving your car as the little lotus is still a question mark.

Nathan

I have been asked to drive a car in the Clubsprint class. As I am already driving a car in Open Class, will it be possible to drive both in the 2 different classes. Yes, they are 2 different cars. I was hoping that the two classes would be run seperately.

hmm are they trying to ban us again? I didn't think anyone even got around to building a competitive 4wd sports sedan anyway. Frankly if they change the rules I am happy to race it with AMRS instead. CAMS are good at not helping themselves.

As for front running pace - look at Giant's old car at Wakefield - 1.02. About the same as a taxi, and Oran Park will allow the GTR's better power to be more of an advantage.

For comparison of a slow pace, my production car has done a 1.19 at Oran Park GP. std boost 0.8bar, full weight 1500kg

Nar man that is a good question. And hot laps in the R35's :laughing-smiley-014:

Nathan,

Just a quick question - do all entrants get like a superlap shirt or something like that? lol

(stupid question I know!)

Hey Dunc

Prob is not CAMS, it is the Sports Sedan Association. I remember when I was running my Under 2 litre Sports Sedan in the mid 90's at Amaroo against 6 litre chevs. We tried to get our own Under 2 litre series just like Victoria and Queensland and NSW did not want to do it.

I still stick to my predictions with times. Giant is a mega car but still over 2 seconds slower than a V8 at wakey (2km Track) on a short track. At Queensland Raceway ( at track just on 3kms) Giant is nearly 6 seconds per lap slower than a V8. Oran is 2.6kms in length.

A 1.12 or 1.13 will win the day.

Edited by Bozman1

With the drivier thing we are going to sit down tomorrow and have a chat. For Open Class its anything goes whatever you want but for Clubsprint we are going for no Pro Drivers. I will have to talk to the guys and decide John's fate on the Clubsprint entry haha.

Mark & Russell ( giant ) are yet to get their R32 on track with its proper tuned setup all the way around QR as they were still not finished at their last outing before going to Japan so it will be interesting I think they headed out there on the weekend. Also from what I have heard their new R34 is aiming to be faster than John bowe's time at Wakefield which means a low 58 not sure if they want to do that time on semis or full slicks tho. Could be very interesting.

Edited by Superlap Australia
Hey Dunc

Prob is not CAMS, it is the Sports Sedan Association. I remember when I was running my Under 2 litre Sports Sedan in the mid 90's at Amaroo against 6 litre chevs. We tried to get our own Under 2 litre series just like Victoria and Queensland and NSW did not want to do it.

I still stick to my predictions with times. Giant is a mega car but still over 2 seconds slower than a V8 at wakey (2km Track) on a short track. At Queensland Raceway ( at track just on 3kms) Giant is nearly 6 seconds per lap slower than a V8. Oran is 2.6kms in length.

A 1.12 or 1.13 will win the day.

That's more realistic, I'm assuming Duncan was being sarcastic about being as quick as the V8 Supercars....

Any games out there with OP GP circuit on it?? Looks like its all the practice I can get.. :)

My Fate!!?!!?!?!?!

Who cares who drives what. This event is all about seeing how fast the cars will go.

What qualifies a driver anyway LOL

Who said I am getting paid. I could be doing it for the love of the sport and the event.

lol yea I know Clubsprint is all about everyday owners getting out there in their own cars tho whereas Open is more race team orientated. Anyway will see what happens in the morning because I was informed today that pro drivers are not allowed to drive in Clubsprint Class unless its their own vehicle. I am not sure how they plan on working that which is why I am having that meeting tomorrow :)

Whoever is deciding these rules Nathan better hurry up and make up there minds

Sounds like you should run 3 classes as was mentioned before.

I will just run the Lotus in both classes then as it is eligable for both :)

Chris - We are looking into shirts at the moment not sure how many yet tho and also not sure if we can have them made in time that is the big question.

Ill take one in XXXL (yeah, yeah, i need to lose the weight)

Sounds like you should run 3 classes as was mentioned before.

+1 :) (but i know it wont happen for this round)

really good to see some interest in this event, i hope it's really good fun!

marks run 1.40 flat at ec in two lap stint there, and should go about 1.5 to two sec's quicker there , as that was before engine and suspension changes.

i have no idea what the r32 will run at OP as we have never even seen it before except on tv, :)

pretty sure the r34 wont be ready for the first superlap as so much to do and havent got the chassis back yet!

i just cant wait to get down there and mix it up with you guys and have some fun. the twenty minute session format really does help add to the fun and getting right in that time! and that 20 minutes dissappears so quickly if you have a drama!!

hoping to get down there next month and get round the track!

knocked a half a sec off our QR sprint time today to 52.9(on two lap stint), mind you on slicks for the first time , so mark never got use to them as there is proably another second and a half in them. which is just amazing. we are preparing for the gatton streets sprints up here this weekend.

cheers russ

That's more realistic, I'm assuming Duncan was being sarcastic about being as quick as the V8 Supercars....

Any games out there with OP GP circuit on it?? Looks like its all the practice I can get.. :)

The V8 Supercar race driver games on PS2/PC etc have Oran GP on it. it'll at least give you an idea on layout. :cheers:

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...