Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys i am having a major argument with a mate of mine that has an r32 gtst. he recently lost it around a bend and jumped the gutter and smacked the under side of the car on the gutter (he has severelly bend and damaged the thick square tubular looking metal bar which run on each side of the car (he has damaged one of them).

From what i can work out that is the chassis rail as this is what holds the front and the back of the car together. he has damaged it just after the passanger door (between the passanger door and the diff).

he is trying to tell me that it is not structural and that r32's are not full chassis and those bars under the car do nothing for support and what holds the car together is the shell and roof e.t.c????

we came accrossd another problem which i think strengthened my argument when we went to jack up the car to do an oil change. i notices that when the car was NOT jacked up the passanger door opened fine, but when it was jacked up the passanger door seemed to rub when it opened and closed giving me the impression that the car was some how bent??

can somebody please clear this issue up on what holds the skyline together and if the 2 chasis rail looking things are in actual fact chassis rails

thanks guys

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/212032-is-an-r32-gtst-full-chassis/
Share on other sites

You are both wrong. So that is the argument settled.

The chassis rail isn't a true chassis rail in the sense of a seperate chassis body arrangement (think truck, old school four wheel drives).

It is however a not insubstantial part of the structure of the car and therefore should be fixed.

The door flexing thing is actually the whole car twisting when it is jacked up. All cars do this to varying degrees. Typically the newer the design of the car the higher the torsional rigidity of the thing.

ok i understand what your saying but, those too bars that run on the under carrage of the car MUST be the main support for the rear of the car (joining the front to the rear), there is no other solid structure that runs from the front to the back. and every structure needs a solid structure holding it together or it will twist.

i have had 18 carsa and never have i jacked a car up and it has caused the door to now rub and hit the door jam except for one car and it was a daihatsu charade with the most cracked chassis you will ever see (which i new about). every time i jacked it up, the front doors overlapped the front guard thats how bad it was.

even when he came on power hard he sort of noticed the car pulled left a little bit out of the ordinary (this was the same side as the hit and the wheel allignment and sh11t like that was perfect).. the car felt like it had a twist when you come on power hard (flexing under pressure)

They are part of the structure but only part of it.

All structures twist. How much they twist is dependent on their torsional rigidity & ofcourse the load iimposed on them.

The torsional rigidity of cars varies. 5 door cars (ie hatchbacks) are amongst the worst in this respect because of the large openings (from the doors/match) in the MONOCOQUE structure ie the shell of the car that gives it its strength along with the two chassis rails. R32's are not particularly rigid if that is your question.

And yes even Daihatsu Charades torque steer.

I jack my R32 GTST up from any point and all the doors close perfectly fine both with std and aftermarket hard suspension.

I had an old VS commodore that when I would jack up the door would NOT close no matter what. I then read the manual and it stated do not open doors when the car is jacked up lol. Freaked me out when the door was sitting ~40mm off what it should have been.

The VS had whiteline/bilstiens all round; reversing out of the drive way I could hear the front and rear windows creeking over the throb of the mildly tweaked 5litr poo. Sounded nice; didn't go all that well in comparison.

40mm - omg

The doors on my R32 are harder to shut when the front or rear is jacked up as well.

I'm not willing to agree, that Skylines have rigid bodys.. at all :P

Those "chassis rails" as djr said aren't really rails. Its a legacy term used in the modern automotive industry. They're ultra thin gauge and NEVER would I rest them on a chassis stand... although I cant count how many ppl i see do.

Made me a little sad when i felt the door not close properaly, but figure it'll be solved when my cage goes in.

Also, Ive seen that many if not most of the 9s BNR32's in Japan stitch weld the front strut towers, in and around the firewall as well. Supposedly 100's of 4WD 9krpm dumps can weaken that area. When my motors out, I know ill have it braced.

Edited by GeeTR

Not sure on exacts, but iv watched it done b4 - Its mostly labour costs. Done with a TIG to minimize localized heating.

I've seen both 'dots' every 1" along seams, as well as welding 1" 'seams', then 2" gap, 1" seams, 2" gap and so on.

I figure I'd give it a go myself, apart from making sure car is on dead level surface (to prevent chassis preload haha) and letting the work cool every now and then, I cant imagine there’s much involved.

In my case, I need to talk to my engineer about cages, to see if I can tie the strut towers properly to the A frame and firewall (re-route brake lines etc)

ne way

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...