Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Dare i say 32 with a 25 in it?

It's the question i've been asking myself for a couple of months now my setup is great if it came on 1000rpm earlier it's jus tooooo DANM laggy when you try to make any reasonable kinda power..

So ithink its either smaller turbo or larger motor.

The only other way i can think of is maybe cams race fuel and a sit7 load of ignition advance??

SO CONFUSED..

anyway sorry for verbal dribble in your thread dude.

  • Replies 165
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I had the same dilemma when i was looking for my skyline last year in November...

In the end i chose r33 1995 GTS T over the R32's...

Its a hard choice, and its really down to personal choice really... If you plan to extensivly mod the car, then all the talk about which as more power and what not, is not so relevant, as both are capable of making power if you have the cash.

Depending on how old you are (for insurance) i would personally go the R32 GTR... there only a bit more then the avg R33 GTS T... i would of chosen this road, if i was not only 20 yrs old with a students budget!

Anyway, R32 or R33.. its still a skyline! and all skylines are good in my books ^^

riiight....u think r33's look good??? haha yeh chek this beauty out...

1105_00.jpg

pffffft....

Whats wrong with it? I find it ok lookwise. It looks excatly like my GMG R33 minus the stock rims. And I'm not a fan of lowering my car coz I hit parking kerbs wayyy to easy.

Edited by Mayuri Krab
btw, y are u unhappy with ur xr6t?

Im not - it still puts a big smile on my face ;-) But the wife drives it 99% of the time and she wants a smaller auto.. :wub:

the majority of driving i do is in traffic with the occasional track day - thats while i was leaning towards the smaller rb20

Im not looking for a big HP car. done that. And while its fun - i just need something to have a bit of fun with.

LOL, come on br3ndan...the middle of the road is the most dangerous place :)

LOL!!!

In that case, i vote for R33 GTS T over the R32 GTS T.

But i really mean it when i say i like all skylines! :D

riiight....u think r33's look good??? haha yeh chek this beauty out...

1105_00.jpg

pffffft....

wat u want is one of these... :D

minor mods on an 32gtst get it moving fairly swiftly

32frontal.jpg

lol u r a funny kent

Edited by ztuned
sr20 in r32 is better than rb20 in r32.. lighter, more torque, more power potential

300rwkw with stock internals too easy hahah

HAve a hunt around for an SR2o with a TD06-20G with 8cm housing. An RB20 with the same turbo is as responsive and makes more power. Thats without the Step 1 cams that SR20s need. Im not convinced you are right :D

The differences aren't enormous. I reckon you need to drive them and make your mind up. Balance out what you want vs each car's good/bad points- but trust me, you need to drive them both to conclude your choice.

Roy,

Ever since the first DECA I went to, I fell in love with your car!!that is the ultimate 32! :D

Esp gate!!!!

3 years ago when I got my skyline - as much as I loved 32's more, the 33 I came across was just too nice to pass up. 32's were always my fav but now 33's are cause I have grown to love my 33!

But yeah, to keep on topic....man, if you do basic mods to both cars - they will be both great fun and can still do good battles/times on the track! Height wise, with a helmet - Id say 33...

I'd like to hear more on the oil starvation and prevention for 33's... :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Here is the mess that I made. That filler there was successful in filling dents in that area. But in the middle area. I can feel dents. And I've gone ocer it multiple times with filler. And the filler is no longer there because i accidently sanded it away. I've chased my tail on this job but this is something else lol. So I'm gonna attempt filler one more time and if it doesn't work I'll just high fill primer the door and see where the issues are because guidecoat is of no use atm.
    • Ok, so I think I sort of figured out where I went wrong. So I definitely overthinked it, and I over sanded, which is probably a large part of the problem. to fix it, I ended up tapping some spots that were likely to be high, made them low, filled them in, and I tackled small sections at a time, and it feels a lot better.    I think what confused me as well is you have the bare metal, and some spots darker and some are lighter, and when I run my finger across it, it' would feel like it's a low spot, but I think it's just a transition in different texture from metal to body filler.    When your finger's sliding on the body filler, and crosses over to the bare metal, going back and forth, it feels like it's a low spot. So I kept putting filler there and sanding, but I think it was just a transition in texture, nothing to do with the low or high spot. But the panel's feels a lot better, and I'm just going to end up priming it, and then I'll block it after with guide coat.   Ended up wasting just about all of my filler on this damn door lol  
    • -10 is plenty for running to an oil cooler. When you look at oil feeds, like power steering feeds, they're much smaller, and then just a larger hose size to move volume in less pressure. No need for -12. Even on the race cars, like Duncans, and endurance cars, most of them are all running -10 and everything works perfectly fine, temps are under control, and there's no restrictions.
    • Update: O2 sensor in my downpipe turned out to be faulty when I plugged in to the Haltech software. Was getting a "open circuit" warning. Tons of carbon buildup on it, probably from when I was running rich for a while before getting it corrected. Replaced with new unit and test drove again. The shuffle still happens, albeit far less now. I am not able to replicate it as reliably and it no longer happens at the same RPM levels as before. The only time I was able to hear it was in 5th going uphill and another time in 5th where there was no noticeable incline but applying more throttle first sped it up and then cleared it. Then once in 4th when I slightly lifted the throttle going over a bump but cleared right after. My understanding is that with the O2 sensor out, the ECU relies entirely on the MAP tune and isn't able to make its small adjustments based on the sensors reading. All in all, a big improvement, though not the silver bullet. Will try validating the actuators are set up correctly, and potentially setting up shop time to tune the boost controller on closed loop rather than the open loop it is set to now. Think if it's set up on closed loop to take the O2 reading, that should deal with these last bits. Will try to update again as I go. 
    • More so GReddy oil relocation kits, sandwich plates, etc. all use 10AN fittings. And same, I've only used 10AN and my car sees track work (circuit, doing laps, not 10 sec squirt business).
×
×
  • Create New...