Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Posting for a mate with an R31, he wants to know if anyone on the SAU site has done this conversion, cause he has just bought an R33 S2 GTR head to do the conversion.

He wants to know -

What power people have made and with what modifications?

What ECU did they use?

What CAMS were used (IF people have done the conversion what would they recomend also)

If anyone has used the N1 oil pump on the RB30 block?

And what size head gasket they used also?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/216424-whose-done-the-2630-na-conversion/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posting for a mate with an R31, he wants to know if anyone on the SAU site has done this conversion, cause he has just bought an R33 S2 GTR head to do the conversion.

He wants to know -

What power people have made and with what modifications?

What ECU did they use?

What CAMS were used (IF people have done the conversion what would they recomend also)

If anyone has used the N1 oil pump on the RB30 block?

And what size head gasket they used also?

1-Depends what mods - Nobody does a 26/30 coversion and keeps it stock.. the best of a 26/30 is extracted when modified..

2-Aftermaket seems the go with PFC being the most popular for the ability to tune and every corner store ebing able to tune one. If you do a big project.. you may aswell do it right and extract the most power out of it.. if not.. do a 25/30 and spend the diffrence on the project.

3-Stock ones will work - Modded ones will work too.. the head works as a normal RB26

4-Yes. You need a new cranck collar but an N1 pump is not essential.. Rb205det is enough..

5-Im assuming your going NA? The smallest possible and then shave the head/deck the block to up the compression ratio to something desirable..

have a look at the RB2*/30 thread in the turbo section of this forum..

  • 2 months later...

He's getting Mark at MRC to do the work.

Going to be interesting, NA screamer LOL.

Apparently an RB26 harmonic balancer is essential due to revs he's hoping to pull (7500ish).

Think he's aiming for 100 HP per litre.

lol - nothings as easy nowadays anymore

boss 'freshened' up his speedway car motor - by pulling it to bits, shaving the head 20thou (AGAIN!!!!), and then screwing it all back together (holden 253) - then tuning it BY EAR!!!!!

he now has no idea what compression he is running - its at about 15:1 on methanol

the 26 head is pretty good flow wise for a n/a - i would consider HKS step 1 or poncams to extract a decent midrange

powerfc def is a go, although you could keep the stock ecu and tune it with a safc neo and get pretty good

n1 oil pump is not needed, but if you can get your hands on one then you can be rest assured that it shouldnt cause any problems later on (a 25 turbo one should be sufficient)

an oil restrictor in the head would be a good idea aswell to keep as little oil in the head as possible (enough to lubricate everything, but not too much that at high revs everything blows into the pvc/catch can) - tomei do em and hks do aswell i think

He's getting Mark at MRC to do the work.

Going to be interesting, NA screamer LOL.

Apparently an RB26 harmonic balancer is essential due to revs he's hoping to pull (7500ish).

Think he's aiming for 100 HP per litre.

If its NA with cams.. he will be seeing more than 7500.

Make sure he Balances the bottom end.. and if knows it will be seeing more than 7500ish.. he may need new rods/shot peened

  • 3 weeks later...
Is it possible to use the turbo loom/injectors or ecu? or should i just go for the N/A ones?

A new stand alone ECU will have to be used as the air fuel ratio's, timing etc. will be completely diffrent

And why wouldnt you be able to use loom and injectors?

A new stand alone ECU will have to be used as the air fuel ratio's, timing etc. will be completely diffrent

And why wouldnt you be able to use loom and injectors?

So are turbo and non turbo looms the same?

It's a 25 turbo head, so you reckon turbo injectors will be fine on the N/A?

What do you recommend for a stand alone ecu to get? I'm not looking at spend the world for it

So are turbo and non turbo looms the same?

It's a 25 turbo head, so you reckon turbo injectors will be fine on the N/A?

What do you recommend for a stand alone ecu to get? I'm not looking at spend the world for it

RB25DET injectors are good fine for an NA application.. if you can squeeze more than 200kw out of them for a turbo application, they will be fine for a 150 odd kw NA project. You could use DE injectors if the engine has minimal mods.

ECU? How long is a piece of string? How much money are you willing to spend? What mods does the engine have? What tuners are available for you to use?

Have a search.. there are a few 25/30 threads around discussing what ECU's people can/are using. Im sure Skit or one of the other boys can shed more light on the situation than I have as to what ECU they are using.

If its a basic engine with simple mods SAFC is usually the simplest option.. these retail for $250 odd and are a basic air fuel ratio adjusting ECU's that are also cheap to tune.

Off the top of my head.. Z32 ecu's can be remapped and are also compatable with NVCS RB25 heads aswell.. this would be ok for a simple engine too.

  • 1 month later...

Heard the thing come into the blocks this arvo. Sounded like a v8 induction note or something crazy!

He got the car back. All up $16k or so for build, conversion, headers, electronics, new clutch etc.

The throttle response is mad when free reved!

Ok, it runs an adaptronic computer, MAP sensor.

25de pistons and stock rods, balanced rebuilt bottom end

12.2:1 comp ratio

ported head with stock valve train still.

Stock 5 speed still and brass button clutch.

$1000 worth of tuned length headers.

It's running 139RWKW @ 5700 at the moment, stock 26 cams are holding it back, and the rest of the exhaust.

So head needs to be machined to accept 280 deg cams with 10.8mm lift, once he save up some dough again.

The engine is so smooth at idle you could balance your loose change on it! (read needs some big cams).

Not to piss on your parade but the power seems a little low for the work done...

Being twin cam and four valve the cams shouldnt really be holding it back that much. Perhaps there is gains to be made with cam timing ajustment and more tuning?

If it has GTR heads you should be able to fit bigger than 10.8mm lift cams. 10.8mm is usually the limit for the RB20/25 heads...

I'm fairly sure you can get 11.5mm + lift to suit GTR head. This should work well with a high revving N/A motor.

It's still being run in so tune ain't aggressive.

I told him to definitely get cams, and adjustable gears too.

Wasn't a cheap exercise for him lol.

Yep 26 head is used in this one.

I'll post a couple o pics when I see him again.

im totally with Nosmo.. 140rwkw is pretty weak.. same work with less comp on a honda makes more than 150kw @ wheels with a much smaller engine..

somethings def not right there..

  • 2 weeks later...

As promised, the pics:

Enjoy

post-12712-1221993753_thumb.jpg

post-12712-1221993779_thumb.jpg

post-12712-1221993801_thumb.jpg

post-12712-1221993838_thumb.jpg

post-12712-1221993867_thumb.jpg

Drove it and the throttle response is awesome. Power drops off at 6500 though and gearbox is crap for shifting (needs an r33 one). Diff is also on the way...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...