Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Does anyone know whether running 18" wheels at the rear and 17" wheels at the front car work. Obviously i may need to tweak ride heights a little. But was thinking i might try to park 255 x 18s out back and keep the fronts to 235 x 17. Fir what i am trying to achieve it looks like hte overall gearing would be about right, i just dont want to run 18s all round for dollars and front guard clearance which may struggle if i try to get a 18 x 8.5 wheel up there

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/217845-staggered-wheel-diameters/
Share on other sites

Manufacturers are doing it OEM these days, so there's nothing inherently wrong with it.

As long as your tyre circumference on the rear is correct, for the speedo, and the circumference ratio between front and rear is unchanged (for ABS and traction control, assuming you have them) then the electronics shouldn't know any different either.

There are valid arguments for puting the wider and lower profile tyres on the front, not the rear.

Wider - R32/33/34's have heavy front weight bias, in the case of 4wd over 60% on the front wheels. As a result they understeer, so why would you want to make that worse by using narrower tyres on the front?

Lower Profile - a lower profile tyre has less sidewall to absorb the torque hit, so a decent horsepower RWD should have a higher profile tyre on the rear, take a look at a top level Sports Sedan as an example of that logic. Lower profile is good for steering response, so they should be on the front.

Hence my argument would be to use the 18's on the front and the 17's on the rear. :dry:

Cheers

gary

Not that this has anything to do with performance, but optically on a vehicle the rear wheels always look smaller than the front, hence why a lot of cars run something like 18's on the front and 19's on the rear so the rear doesnt look smaller than the front. Especially on something like a skyline which has a big ass (compared to like a S15). Have a look next time you look at your car from a bit of a distance, the rear wheels look smaller then the front.

Hey Garry, the only reason I wanted to go the 18's on the rear is because RE55's only come in a 255 in a 17, and I'd like to run the 285's available in the 18's.

Do you think it would have an adverse affect on handling, considering I run 17's on my 180SX at the moment?

Cheers

Dane

can i run 18s on the front and 17s on the back for occasional drift day and daily.

i was thinking of running 235/40/18 on the front and 235/45/17 on the rears?

i guess to fit the 235s on the 17 i would need the rims to be width 8-9?

Edited by TaKz
Hey Garry, the only reason I wanted to go the 18's on the rear is because RE55's only come in a 255 in a 17, and I'd like to run the 285's available in the 18's.

Do you think it would have an adverse affect on handling, considering I run 17's on my 180SX at the moment?

Cheers

Dane

A 180SX is not an R32/33/34, they don't have the weight of an RB. Unless you have done the RB conversion, in which case the rule applies (they understeer if you put smaller tyres on the front).

Cheers

Gary

guess to fit the 235s on the 17 i would need the rims to be width 8-9?

yup :down:

8 is fine.. and fits perfect

---

Many people in japan have 17s front, 18s rear. I dont see why not.

I had 16s front, 18s rear when i was at wakefield track day. Car handled fine

Just try it out and test the car for yourself.

If you have a RWD drive car..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Did and sync timing with light 
    • Have you done the Ignition Sync Wizard in the AEM software?
    • Find out what RPM it was idling at with the IACV unplugged. It's very weird that the rpm didn't change at all, and then it stalled. When it stalls is it nearly like a switch off, like you've turned the engine off? Or is it more stutters and sputters and coughs to death over a few seconds? Or does the RPM just slowly keep going down and down? Have you done a test of trying to start it with the AFM unplugged? Does it still die?     If you Follow Josh's advice on using Nistune to check the voltages (which is a perfect method!) if you see anything out of wack voltage wise, THEN get the multimeter out and read the voltage directly at the sensor. If the two vary, then you're now looking for a wiring issue vs a sensor issue. So be aware, what the ECU sees, may not be what the sensor is actually saying too...
    • You very likely need to get it on a dyno and tune it. My assumption is, you've got an RB25DET tune in it, which has a different manifold, different injectors, and different cams as a minimum. What O2 sensor are you running?   When you say it runs extremely rich from idle all the way to redline, is this just free revving it you see that?
    • I seem to the be only person that is using a Haltech 2500 on an NA motor, I've installed a Bosch DBW throttle body to the OEM intake manifold and am having problems maintaining AFR even with the wideband o2.  It will run extremely rich at idle and up to redline, but under load it will go extremely lean in the 20s and i'm essentially having to rev it over 4k and feather the clutch to get it up to speed.  I've read a few other threads of about the butterfly, it seems removing the vacuum to it is supposed to have it remain open, i've noticed no difference under 4k with the vacuum line to it plugged.  I'm hoping someone here has had luck using the NA manifold with Haltech, and if they happen to have a tune for it.  
×
×
  • Create New...