Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey Guys,

Just wondering about whether i'll need to upgrade the ecu, or add a piggyback or not even bother?

Currently my car is stock, other than a cat-back exhaust and air filter.

I aim to keep the car as stock as possible, but also to get as close to 200rwkw as i can without changing turbos/internals, with the goal being performance, efficiency and reliability (it's my daily driver)

So my planned mod path thus far looks like:

* Front/Dump pipe + High flow cat

* Larger Intercooler (e.g. r34 side mount to keep the stock look)

* Boost it up a little, say 10PSI

** also considering a water injection kit **

My question is: with this relatively small list of modifications, do i need to address the ECU to make the most of them? And if so, which path to take - pfc, safc, emanage or other?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/221232-aftermarket-ecus/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

this has been covered to death sorry - you really should try searching

there are lots of modification guides, how-to's and many step by step guides

even documentation like the PFC FAQ covers the PFC vs the SAFC and other common ECU's

all of the information is out there, you should just search and read it

but yes, in summary a stand alone ECU will give you all the benefits you need

this will include fuel economy, response, power etc

I have the emanage and it works really well for me. Considering the mods you have, it would work great for you as well...

That being said, so would a PFC, but the Emanage is considerably cheaper and easier to install... Less tuners know them though.

pfc is probably the best one as there's a lot of people that can tune them ..but the cost is rather high (both chip and the tune itself). However you can score them on japanese auctions for a good price if you're lucky .. I just got an R34 GTT PFC off japanese auctions for $160 ($270 or so after all import costs) using importmonster.com.au so saved $7-800 right there ;D

a full PFC tune should cost $500

i cannot understand how a full PFC tune would cost anywhere near $1000

for $1000 i would want full documentation of the tune

how its setup, what to expect, a backup of the tune on a floppy disk

complete map dump and every single value on the 20x20 map changed from std

its complete overkill and lunacy, a std $500 should be fine for 9 out of 10 setups

Sorry to hijack, but also in a similar situation my self.

The OP stated he wants to keep the car "stock locking".

How stock can u get a PFC to look. Does it hide tucked away or is it something that a cop can shine his torch on and say "defection time!!!"

If it is notcied, how easy is it so swap out and put the stock ECU back in.

My mods are as follows and i figure a PFC would be next?

R33 Gtst

3" turbo back exhaust (split dump/front)

Highflow cat

FMIC (Blitz LM style which return back to stock pipes - so no hole needed)

Boost @ 11psi (bleed valve)

Thanks

Edited by Ricos

the PFC and the stock use are the same type of case

just the apexi unit has the hand controller port and an apexi logo on the case

you can swap over the std ecu lid with the PFC lid so that there is no apexi logo

the PFC is a direct fit unit, true plug and play

so if you are caught out you can undo the PFC

slot back the STD ecu and the car will start first crank

no wire changes etc are needed to go between std ECU and PFC

How stock can u get a PFC to look. Does it hide tucked away or is it something that a cop can shine his torch on and say "defection time!!!"

If it is notcied, how easy is it so swap out and put the stock ECU back in.

If you dont have a hand controller you can just as easily leave it where the stock ECU resides, passanger footwell kicker pannel.

How easy is it to swap over? Just undo one screw.

Now Im going to hijack,

With such simple mods why not just use a Apexi SAFC?

PFC's to me seem like overkill for such simple mods. You only need to play around with the Air fuel ratio and perhaps the timing.

Why not just use an SAFC that can be had for $200?

With such simple mods why not just use a Apexi SAFC?

PFC's to me seem like overkill for such simple mods. You only need to play around with the Air fuel ratio and perhaps the timing.

Why not just use an SAFC that can be had for $200?

Well that's the reason i raised the post initially - i wanted to know if i needed to go full blown ecu replacement, or if a piggyback would be enough. Though i thought that timing is not something that the SAFC could adjust... and i would need a PowerFC if i wanted to change timings.

Well that's the reason i raised the post initially - i wanted to know if i needed to go full blown ecu replacement, or if a piggyback would be enough. Though i thought that timing is not something that the SAFC could adjust... and i would need a PowerFC if i wanted to change timings.

Timing is adjusted from the engine bay..

no, sadly it's not. base timing is SET in the engine bay, and once set to factory spec needs to be left well alone. to adjust the timing map you need a power FC, or chip, or whatever but an SAFC simply alters the voltage signal between the AFM and the stock ECU which alters the fuel mixture.

a full PFC tune should cost $500

i cannot understand how a full PFC tune would cost anywhere near $1000

for $1000 i would want full documentation of the tune

how its setup, what to expect, a backup of the tune on a floppy disk

complete map dump and every single value on the 20x20 map changed from std

its complete overkill and lunacy, a std $500 should be fine for 9 out of 10 setups

LOL....floppy disk, they still around????? :P

if u plan on going for another turbo and etc. go a pfc. but with the mods u have now i recommend a safc neo.

PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE dont get a EMU...i know i say it all the time...but they are utter shit!!!

ultimately pfc...but that may be a bit extravagant for the mods u have now

Edited by r33cruiser

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...