Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey all,

About a month ago i purchased a 32 gtr but it wasn't until recently i noticed that the front left air duct is blocked off with what feels like a piece of rubber. Is this normal on a stock gtr? The front bar has been resprayed and i'm starting to think that its been left on afterwards. Would this having any effect on the intake?

Thanks

post-25823-1212576562_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/222360-does-this-look-right/
Share on other sites

Have you checked to see what's behind the cover? If there's an oil cooler there it's got the cover there to keep oil temps up during winter, and taken off during summer/track days.

During a respray the bar will be removed, so it wouldn't need covers to be placed on it.

I'd remove it, but as long as it's not blocking airflow to radiator/intercooler it won't be a drama.

Got my stock gtr r32 and It also came with the rubber flap. It's factory fitment

If you have a look under ther wheel well plastic lyner you will also have a box resinator.

I removed all those and some more plastic intake crap

Got to be at least an extra 100kw worth of more power now :D

Hey all,

About a month ago i purchased a 32 gtr but it wasn't until recently i noticed that the front left air duct is blocked off with what feels like a piece of rubber. Is this normal on a stock gtr? The front bar has been resprayed and i'm starting to think that its been left on afterwards. Would this having any effect on the intake?

Thanks

post-25823-1212576562_thumb.jpg

LOL that looks like masking tape thats been left on after the respray...

it's factory. you can remove it if you want but just removing it wont do anythnig except cost you some aero.

however your car has definitely been resprayed (and not too well by the look of it). the blanking plate from the factory was just black on call cars. damn, I just noticed they painted the factory lip too. what a shame ;)

well lots of GTRs have had them removed over the years. people remove them, and remove the resonator box behind it too. and the duct can be useful if you put an oil cooler in there or use some pipe to duct cool air up to your airbox/pods. but unless you put either of those in there you may as well just leave the blanking plate in.

Behind the wiper bottle on 32R's is a bung that when removed allows air to travel from the left duct...ARC make a vented plate that fits on the wheel well to allow the rest of the air to pass through or vent hot air from an oil cooler. Or you could get a local shop that does vents for hot rodders to do one for you and save some cash

ARC Wind Master

01.jpg

Thanks for your reply guys. If it came like that from the factory i may aswell leave it. Will the ARC vent significantly reduce heat around the intercooler? As Mr Keets & Beer Baron said, I can't see it being very beneficial unless you have an oil cooler.

Behind the wiper bottle on 32R's is a bung that when removed allows air to travel from the left duct...ARC make a vented plate that fits on the wheel well to allow the rest of the air to pass through or vent hot air from an oil cooler. Or you could get a local shop that does vents for hot rodders to do one for you and save some cash

ARC Wind Master

01.jpg

go down to bunnings and get a house vent cover and cut it in half... $5 / 2 = $2.50

gold.

Femmo - Duno man, doesn't look like tape / butchers paper to me. Looks like black ABS plastic with a grey sheen due to the camera flash... looks kinda factory lookin? lol.

A resonator is a "tuned space" (empty box) attached to the inlet track, used by manufacture to try and tune intake resonance drone out of the system. Theres nothing factory that takes in air from that brake duct.. hence filling it up.

Edited by GeeTR

GeeTR is correct. Some cars have a resinator on the intake before the air filter to quieten the induction noise. It's the first thing I took off my wrx and r32 gtr. I see em as a restriction to the air intake. I would suggest if you got one on your car remove it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...