Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'm seriously considering purchasing a 4 door (sedan) 1996 GTS-t Skyline. Now obviously the sedan model isn't going to perform quite as well as the coupe, but is the performance hit anything significant?

I was planning on getting a coupe, but the sedan I'm looking at is a pretty damn good deal.

Thanks for any advice.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/223207-2d-vs-4d-skyline-performance-drop/
Share on other sites

i test drove the 4dr 34 and 2dr 34...massive difference.

they were non turbos though.

what matt says about the extra two kegs is right tho..

Really? The extra doors/length must really add a significant amount of weight then, assuming the specs between the coupe/sedan are identical….

Anyone able to give more confirmation of this, or know if this is consistent in the R33 model?

IMO,

I have never driven a 4dr, though I have heard what they have handled like. I think what you might have to consider is the marketing purpose of a 4dr, what they would do to a 4dr. The only thing I can think of is the suspension being tuned differently to match the body's rigidity. Possibly with the 4dr since you have a big chunk of the side cut out for a door, the flexural rigidity would go down.

Thats my thoughts. Don't get me wrong I think 4dr skylines look hawt done right. Im still waiting to hear from someone to convert a 4dr r32 into a 4dr gtr, or buy a AUTECH r32 and put some turbz on that.

Performance difference could easily be attributed to incorrect timing on one car

fuel being used

condition of the motor

etc

for cars that are near enough to the same, you'd be hard pressed to pick it substantially

IMO,

I have never driven a 4dr, though I have heard what they have handled like. I think what you might have to consider is the marketing purpose of a 4dr, what they would do to a 4dr. The only thing I can think of is the suspension being tuned differently to match the body's rigidity. Possibly with the 4dr since you have a big chunk of the side cut out for a door, the flexural rigidity would go down.

Thats my thoughts. Don't get me wrong I think 4dr skylines look hawt done right. Im still waiting to hear from someone to convert a 4dr r32 into a 4dr gtr, or buy a AUTECH r32 and put some turbz on that.

What have you heared that they handle like then?

Havnt driven a 33 4door, but have driven a 33gtst, and on a seperate occasion r34 25GT (rwd non-turbo manuals) 2 and 4 doors back to back to specifically see if there is a differecne (wanted to know how they go as im planning on buying a 4door R34 GTFOUR in the near future).

Both the r34s perform almost identically.

If you percieved a difference it was most likley that the 2door that you drove was an r34 GTV which has the brakes and suspension from the GTT, even then the difference isnt that huge. There should be almost no difference in performance, there is only a 60kg weight difference.

As for the OPs question, there may be a difference, not 100% sure on the R33s, but the fundamental structure of the suspension is the same, but it may have a slightly softer set-up. Nothing a SydneyKid suspension kit would fix. And the engine and drivetrain are exactly the same.

check this out for the specs:

http://www.japanesesportcars.com/skyline/s...r33_gts25tm.php

The sedan is 8cm longer and 2cm taller and same ground clearance. Both sedan and coupe have identical wheelbase and track, and the sedan weighs 70kg more.

So to answer your question f**k all difference, go for a 4 door! thats my plan anyway.

Test driven both 2 dr and 4dr R33 and R34 , In the end i switched from a 2 dr R33 to a 4 dr R34

More space and bigger boot.....

unless u really want a 2 door skyline, not worth paying the extra $$ for it...

Moreover, 2 doors attract lots more attention ...unless thats what u want

I find that extra weight negligible for daily driving.....

anyway tats my 2 cents...

haha are you quoting my bad engarish?

on the handling side of things, what i hear is they have more sway about them and just dont come up to the "coupe" standard.

so since the four doors have more sway your saying the 2 doors handle better, the last time i looked new zealands drift champ was driving a 4 door. :)

post-50030-1213354082_thumb.jpg

dont confuse the comparison with a gtr, the only diff is the fact ones a coupe and ones a four door.

i have found that 9 times out of ten i can full lock drift, with out feeling the rear of the car wanting to overtake the front,

the gtr was very uneasy, as i hate HICAS, but now handles just aswell since ive had it removed

Edited by nizmonut
haha are you quoting my bad engarish?

on the handling side of things, what i hear is they have more sway about them and just dont come up to the "coupe" standard.

I hope the 4 door isnt worse... considering how much strengthening the 2 door needs. Mine felt like a dead fish less than stock, ie less the strut braces (as most cars are sold). With them and some other bracing the car tightened up.. but that isn't stock.

I like how my 4dr handles, but it is awd, and for some reason has had additional under body bracing, which from memory runs from under the front doors to the rear suspension, weirdest thing I've ever seen. I'd suppose it would reduce flex though.

I have owned a r33 gts25t sedan and now a coupe.

the sedan is something like 50 kg's heavier.

You cant notice a difference between the two mod for mod.. and if u can u may just well have ur hand on it :geek:.. I am speaking for r33 gts25t's only..

If its an r33 ur after, dont for one second think the sedan wont perform..... all performance part are interchanable ie suspension, all motor, zorst etc..

so since the four doors have more sway your saying the 2 doors handle better, the last time i looked new zealands drift champ was driving a 4 door. :ermm:

post-50030-1213354082_thumb.jpg

dont confuse the comparison with a gtr, the only diff is the fact ones a coupe and ones a four door.

i have found that 9 times out of ten i can full lock drift, with out feeling the rear of the car wanting to overtake the front,

the gtr was very uneasy, as i hate HICAS, but now handles just aswell since ive had it removed

But isnt being New Zealand champ the same as being the smartest kid with Down syndrome. :)

on the subject of differences, does anyone know for certain that the back lights of a r34 coupe can fit sedan? i mean the whole assembly...

cheers guys

No they won't fit. Completely different.

Edited by n15m0

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Version 1 aluminium airbox is.......not acceptable No pics as I "didn't like the look.....alot" Even after all my "CAD", and measurements, the leg near the fusebox just didn't sit right as it ended up about 10mm long and made the angle of the dangle look wrong, the height was a little short as well, meh, I wasn't that confident that Version 1 was going to be an instant winner I might give Version 2 another go, there's plenty of aluminium at work, but, after having in on and off a few times, and laying in the old OEM airbox without the new pod filter and MAF, there may be an option to modify the OEM air box and still use the Autoexe front cover and filter.... maybe This >  Needs to fit in here, but using the panel, and not the pod, the MAF will need to fit in the airbox though> I'm thinking as the old OEM box and Autoexe cover that is sitting in the shed is just sitting around doing nothing, and they are relatively abundant and cheap to replace if I mess it up and need another, it may well fit with some modifications to how the Autoexe brackets mounts to the rad support, and some dremiling to move it get in there, should give me some more room for activities, as I don't want to move the MAF and affect the tune Sealing the hole it requires to stick it in the air box is simple, a tight fit and some pinch weld will seal it up tight  I am calling this a later problem though
    • and it ends up being already priced in as though you're just on 91RON without any ethanol. Car will lose a bit of economy as the short and long term fuel trims bring down the AFR back to stoich or whatever it is for cruise/idle for the engine.  
    • Oh, you are right. But, in Australia E10 is based on 91RON fuel and ends up being 94RON. Hence it being the cheaper option for economy cars. The more performance oriented cars go for the 98RON fuel that has no ethanol mixed in. The only step up we have left then at some petrol stations is E85.
    • There is a warning that "this thread is super old" but they ignore that anyway...
    • With 10% Ethanol, we're talking 2-3% fuel consumption difference. The emissions reductions and octane boost in my opinion far outweigh this almost non existent loss.    My tanks sitting at 80%. Luckily that should go down fast as I'm on vacation again for the next two weeks. 
×
×
  • Create New...