Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

To me that looks like a pretty crap tune to be perfectly honest ... waaay too lean. That car's probably detonating badly throughout the rev range. This is what a safe tune should look like (blue line is tuned, red is stock) approximately to have no detonations, although it's an R34 with a stock turbo: http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...t&id=165598

Edited by Delta Force

ok got my car back from the tuners few things I was told is that he tunes on a dyno pack not dyno dynamic and he said the line looks like its jumping up and down cause dyno packs use alot more resolution then dyno dynamics, he told me if i put it on a dyno dynamic dyno the line would look a lot smoother......which kind makes sence as the afr on my chart goes up in .2 increments eg 11.8 12 12.2 12.4 over a dyno dynamics which goes from like 11 to 12 ect if that makes any sence hahah! One thing that is weird is the print out I got this time only reads 252kw and he said he didnt even touch the boost just adjusted the fuel??? tell me wot you think of the new graph, cheers

http://i39.photobucket.com/albums/e176/kellyfj/retune.jpg

Dyno thing doesnt stand with me, its AFR's, the wideband doesnt lie! You can make any resolution go up and down, its just the axis you set it on.

AFR's looks a fair bit better there now.

Is this a SR20?

Where is the boost plot?

yeh sr, just got this print out as he said he only adjusted the fuel, boost is on one of the other graphs...do u know why on this graph it reads 252kw but on the tune he did yesturday it pulled 274kw? like I said only thing he adjusted 2day was the fuel not boost???

IT just looks odd, not knowing how SR's behave but that midrange area around 4500-5500 looks like its going to be so meaty, yet it kinda drops off and then picks up again. Just sounds to me like there is something still left top open up

...do u know why on this graph it reads 252kw but on the tune he did yesturday it pulled 274kw? like I said only thing he adjusted 2day was the fuel not boost???

Comparing the two graphs, your tuners knocked half a point worth of fuel in (~12.75 -> ~12.2) where you make peak power ~6000rpm.

The fueling increase could easily account for 20rwkw loss me thinks.

Edited by GeeTR

post-1240-1213918307_thumb.jpg

Maybe its a map sensor tuning issue I am not sure as i love my AFM's...... Its much better and the car would run better. I would also say that if that was cleaned up you should be able to get more mid range and have the boost comming on a bit earlier.

maybe this guy is having issues with your ecu ? its much safer now but still not as rich as i would like it.

is the engine forged?

Looks to me like the range between 3000 - 5000 needs more time spent on it.

Your sampling rate and scale will affect how it looks in graphical form, but reading the raw numbers in a table will still tell you it's jumping around too much. Expect to see some saw-tooth effect, but it's the magnitude of change that I'd be targeting, and get him to work at it.

12.0 to 12.2:1 at higher revs looks OK, and it's easy to see the map richened up beyond 6000.

IMO you should tune it to run sweetly rather than be concerned about an apparent 20kW loss at this stage. You might find with the fueling sorted he can focus on ignition, which is where a lot of power is forfeited.

post-1240-1213918307_thumb.jpg

Maybe its a map sensor tuning issue I am not sure as i love my AFM's...... Its much better and the car would run better. I would also say that if that was cleaned up you should be able to get more mid range and have the boost comming on a bit earlier.

maybe this guy is having issues with your ecu ? its much safer now but still not as rich as i would like it.

is the engine forged?

Hi Guilt-Toy. no the engine is not forged...stock internals

I was told the reason that the mid range section afr's are higher is because right up to 5000rpm the car is not really under much load as its still in the process of trying to spool that big snail and its not until about 5000rpm onwards where it really starts to move and generate alot more power. It makes sence to me cause when I drive the car I can relate to wot he told me??? Of the car is not under to much load up until 5000rpm are thoes afr's safe? cheers

Those AFR's are much safer then before. Being in QLD with the hotter weather i would still like to see 11.8 afr across the board (on boost) for piece of mind, then I would consider the tune safe.

That tune may be considered safe by other tuners who know what they are doing so don't take my opinion as gospel mate, i just like to keep em a bit richer to help cool the cyl's which helps to reduce detonation in case of a fuel surge or a bad batch of fuel etc etc. Its my engine i spent big $$'s so I would rather see 30kw less and nice healthy engine then drive around with a hand grenade under the bonnet.

mind you those AFR's you have now are not what i would call a hand grenade....... but i would not like to run my engine like that.. thats all.

thanks for all ur help I really do appreciate it....I dont think his guna be happy if I keep hassling him but his has promised me that thoes afr's are now safe and he will be the one paying the bill for the engine rebuild if it does blow as I have told him ova and ova make sure the tune is safe....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I had 3 counts over the last couple of weeks once where i got stranded at a jdm paint yard booking in some work. 2nd time was moving the car into the drive way for the inspection and the 3rd was during the inspection for the co2 leak test. Fix: 1st, car off for a hour and half disconnected battery 10mins 4th try car started 2nd, 5th try started 3rd, countless time starting disconnected battery dude was under the hood listening to the starting sequence fuel pump ect.   
    • This. As for your options - I suggest remote mounting the Nissan sensor further away on a length of steel tube. That tube to have a loop in it to handle vibration, etc etc. You will need to either put a tee and a bleed fitting near the sensor, or crack the fitting at the sensor to bleed it full of oil when you first set it up, otherwise you won't get the line filled. But this is a small problem. Just needs enough access to get it done.
    • The time is always correct. Only the date is wrong. It currently thinks it is January 19. Tomorrow it will say it is January 20. The date and time are ( should be ! ) retrieved from the GPS navigation system.
    • Buy yourself a set of easy outs. See if they will get a good bite in and unthread it.   Very very lucky the whole sender didn't let go while on the track and cost you a motor!
    • Well GTSBoy, prepare yourself further. I did a track day with 1/2 a day prep on Friday, inpromptu. The good news is that I got home, and didn't drive the car into a wall. Everything seemed mostly okay. The car was even a little faster than it was last time. I also got to get some good datalog data too. I also noticed a tiny bit of knock which was (luckily?) recorded. All I know is the knock sensors got recalibrated.... and are notorious for false knock. So I don't know if they are too sensitive, not sensitive enough... or some other third option. But I reduced timing anyway. It wasn't every pull through the session either. Think along the lines of -1 degree of timing for say, three instances while at the top of 4th in a 20 minute all-hot-lap session. Unfortunately at the end of session 2... I noticed a little oil. I borrowed some jack stands and a jack and took a look under there, but as is often the case, messing around with it kinda half cleaned it up, it was not conclusive where it was coming from. I decided to give it another go and see how it was. The amount of oil was maybe one/two small drops. I did another 20 minute session and car went well, and I was just starting to get into it and not be terrified of driving on track. I pulled over and checked in the pits and saw this: This is where I called it, packed up and went home as I live ~20 min from the track with a VERY VERY CLOSE EYE on Oil Pressure on the way home. The volume wasn't much but you never know. I checked it today when I had my own space/tools/time to find out what was going on, wanted to clean it up, run the car and see if any of the fittings from around the oil filter were causing it. I have like.. 5 fittings there, so I suspected one was (hopefully?) the culprit. It became immediately apparent as soon as I looked around more closely. 795d266d-a034-4b8c-89c9-d83860f5d00a.mp4       This is the R34 GTT oil sender connected via an adapter to an oil cooler block I have installed which runs AN lines to my cooler (and back). There's also an oil temp sensor on top.  Just after that video, I attempted to unthread the sensor to see if it's loose/worn and it disintegrated in my hand. So yes. I am glad I noticed that oil because it would appear that complete and utter catastrophic engine failure was about 1 second of engine runtime away. I did try to drill the fitting out, and only succeeded in drilling the middle hole much larger and now there's a... smooth hole in there with what looks like a damn sleeve still incredibly tight in there. Not really sure how to proceed from here. My options: 1) Find someone who can remove the stuck fitting, and use a steel adapter so it won't fatigue? (Female BSPT for the R34 sender to 1/8NPT male - HARD to find). IF it isn't possible to remove - Buy a new block ($320) and have someone tap a new 1/8NPT in the top of it ($????) and hope the steel adapter works better. 2) Buy a new block and give up on the OEM pressure sender for the dash entirely, and use the supplied 1/8 NPT for the oil temp sender. Having the oil pressure read 0 in the dash with the warning lamp will give me a lot of anxiety driving around. I do have the actual GM sensor/sender working, but it needs OBD2 as a gauge. If I'm datalogging I don't actually have a readout of what the gauge is currently displaying. 3) Other? Find a new location for the OEM sender? Though I don't know of anywhere that will work. I also don't know if a steel adapter is actually functionally smart here. It's clearly leveraged itself through vibration of the motor and snapped in half. This doesn't seem like a setup a smart person would replicate given the weight of the OEM sender. Still pretty happy being lucky for once and seeing this at the absolute last moment before bye bye motor in a big way, even if an adapter is apparently 6 weeks+ delivery and I have no way to free the current stuck/potentially destroyed threads in the current oil block.
×
×
  • Create New...