Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

Im trying to pick a tyre from the Federal range. I have two options:

Federal SS-595 255/40 R17 96W

post-32255-1213810386_thumb.jpg

* Low profile sidewalls for ultimate performance

* Excellent comfort characteristics

* Uni-directional tread patter

* Flange protector for alloy rims

* Affordable price

* ZR and VR speed rated

Federal 595 RS 235/40 ZR17 90W TW

post-32255-1213810379_thumb.jpg

New, semi-slick, sport competition 595RS - designed for exceptional traction and grip. Cutting-edge technological advances in design, construction, pattern and compounds. Best performance in its class - a street legal competition tire with the characteristics of a slick.

* Evenly dispersed block stiffness, same level of stiffness in the center and the shoulder for stronger grip and traction, prevents irregular wear

* Uni-directional V-shaped main groove enhances streamline form and also improves aquaplaning ability at high speeds. Wide-angled grooves increase block stiffness, further enhancing tire's grip and traction

* Engraved pattern name along the groove creates an exquisite product image

* Sub-grooves on the shoulder disperse block stiffness, improving ride comfort, grip and traction

* Complete block stiffness provides excellent lateral stability in cornering

Now the SS-595 is a high performance street tyre with a width of 255. While the 595RS is a semi slick but with a width of only 235.

Would the extra width of the SS be better than getting the RS?

They will be going on a set of 17x8.5 wheels for the track.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/224552-help-me-choose-a-federal-tyre/
Share on other sites

take the RS if ur doing track

Im running 595 ss on my r33 gts t. only 6 or 7 months old... and they are shit for grip. especially in the wet.

Im running 235 at front and 255 at back, even with the extra width fails to hold under high load/revving/boost.

Cant imagine running SS on track... waste ur time and fuel.

Not sure on RS never used them b4, but i have heard good things.

Edited by br3ndan

just bought a full set of federal RS 235/45/17 for my r33 gtst. so far so good, traction isn't an issue with 280rwkw. taking it to the wakie track day this saturday, i'll let you know how they perform there shortly :ninja:

why does it have to be federals? there are plenty of other tyre options out there, and to be honest the federals haven't impressed me all that much, except that they are dirt cheap.

why does it have to be federals? there are plenty of other tyre options out there, and to be honest the federals haven't impressed me all that much, except that they are dirt cheap.

Cheap,yes they are. just wanted to get peoples opinions of them,especially the RS ones.

I've been using the R's for quite some time now and IMO they rok. No they are not capable of the same lap times as some of the more fancied semi's available but they are unpteen times more durable and are still streets ahead of any street tyre for grip.

I would rate them in between good street rubber and high end semi's for grip And with 16000 kays, several track days and other sheanigans on board mine are still going strong.

Definitely one of the better compromise tyres out there considering the cost versus performance versus durability.

The 235/45-17 rs cost almost as much as a 235/45-17 RE55. If you have a set of track only rims you will be a lot happier with the re55 (as in once you figure out how to drive around wakefield properly about 3 seconds a lap happier)

I have 225 RS's on the front of mine for street duty and the occasional wet track day where they are excellent but as soon as the dry line appears the re55's go on as they are that much grippier.

Another thing worth considering is the deeper tread depth of the street tyre, smaller tread blocks and softer sidewall don't feel very nice when you are really pushing and you tend to melt/feather the edges of the blocks a lot easier too. You will probably overheat the tyre so grip falls away further, it will happen sooner in the street tyre than the proper semi.

i wouldn't even consider the SS for anything other than street duties.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
    • Probably not. A workshop grade scantool is my go to for proper Consult interrogation. Any workshop grade tool should do it. Just go to a workshop.
×
×
  • Create New...