Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

as much as i love street circuits it sucks for the rest of us. it deprives the rest of us of a place to race. they are demolishing oran park which normal people were free to use year round. and since no replacement has been forthcoming they can now just use a street circuit for the super taxis. :D

Sydney doesn't give a rats about motorsport. Never has. You can say the same for NSW as a whole. This thing has about as much legs as the Canberra debacle.

It is yet another crass effort by Cochrane et al to gouge more money out of promoters/governments.

All it ever ends up in is crap racing, massive repair bills for the teams & this time allows the tree hugger brigades to further focus their misdirected anger on motorsport. In the meantime the few remaining purpose built circuits go to rack & ruin.

Fkn great.

Would be cool, but doubt it will happen as all the tree huggers will be up in arms about all the trees that need to be taken out :D

I do like the street circuit as grew up in SA so what I am used too..

I guess we wait and see :D

Fkn street cicuits are the death of grass roots motorsport in Australia.

That venue however would be good for the ARC to hold a publically accessable special stage. ARC needs to bring the sport to the people or risk fading away.

Cochmuncher should be mandated to support existing tracks for the future of the sport in general.

This came up a few years ago but never seemed to get off the ground then - lets hope the same thing happens again. As many above have stated, it does nothing for motorsport in NSW except cause resent amongst tenants and over-enthusiatic environmentalists.

I reckon we should all write to the Premier's office and Ian McDonald and express our concern - If motorsport enthusiasts don't want it, and nobody else does, where does that leave them?

On top of this, the article quotes it could cost $30 million.... for that price we could have half a F1 spec permanent facility, which could be built somewhere more suitable and benefit the state year-round. I just don't get this idea....

oh, and the track is boring - why not run it right through the middle of the stadium and out the other side :rofl:

Just saw it on the news, it would be a good idea to boost up motorsport i guess, well op is shutting down, so theres really not much place to anticipate those kind of stuff, imagine the F1's rawing through the streets of Olympic park :rofl:

All motorsport fans share the same thoughts, temporary circuits deprive the permanent circuits of their big money making event for the year. That means less permanent circuits for us all. CockRun wants a monopoly, he wants all advertising and promotional money for circuit racing to go to V8's. He doesn't want other classes, categories or levels of motorsport taking away his potential revenue. he would be quite happy to see all permanent circuits close and the only circuit racing be V8's. Take a look at what the Clipsal has done to SA circuit racing, it sucks all the money out of the state and leaves none for AIR or Mallala.

Sydney doesn't give a rats about motorsport. Never has. You can say the same for NSW as a whole.

With 3 permanent circuits booked every day of the year, I am not sure that I can agree with this though. Plus the highest long term attendance crowds at Bathurst and the most watched motorsport event, which is also happens to be in NSW. Based on what I see I'd say circuit racing in NSW is way ahead of any other state, and I get to most circuits around the country at least once a year. Take Improved Production for example, NSW has more competitors than the rest of the states added together.

Cheers

Gary

I with ya lads. Bin this idea and keep OP!

The state gov't are considering this proposal with the likely shadow of corporate pressure lurking behind. The circuit could potentially yield huge advertising, broadcast and ticket sale revenues, not to mention overseas investment (like Super GT hopping from Malaysia to Sydney).

Corporate interests ARE gov't interests don't forget.

But it is unlikely to go ahead because it's obvious how sh*t of an idea this for everyone else. It would ruin the image of Syd Olympic Park.

What is the image of Sydney Olympic Park? All I see is a massive piece of land in the middle of Sydney that rarely gets used but cost the taxpayer bazillions to have built all for 1mth back in 2000.

All motorsport fans share the same thoughts, temporary circuits deprive the permanent circuits of their big money making event for the year. That means less permanent circuits for us all. CockRun wants a monopoly, he wants all advertising and promotional money for circuit racing to go to V8's. He doesn't want other classes, categories or levels of motorsport taking away his potential revenue. he would be quite happy to see all permanent circuits close and the only circuit racing be V8's. Take a look at what the Clipsal has done to SA circuit racing, it sucks all the money out of the state and leaves none for AIR or Mallala.

With 3 permanent circuits booked every day of the year, I am not sure that I can agree with this though. Plus the highest long term attendance crowds at Bathurst and the most watched motorsport event, which is also happens to be in NSW. Based on what I see I'd say circuit racing in NSW is way ahead of any other state, and I get to most circuits around the country at least once a year. Take Improved Production for example, NSW has more competitors than the rest of the states added together.

Cheers

Gary

SA is a good example of what happens when you have a street event at the expense of one at a purpose built circuit. Fortunately over here in WA there is the prospect of a good result for the local circuit. (New pits that no one really cares about but more importantly a circuit extension ) This is mostly because the state govt told Cochrant to shove his street race.

I should have made myself a bit clearer with regard to NSW. I didn't mean the participants I meant the spectators. Most of the crowd figures for V8's and many other events are dire. Bathurst is Bathurst. Alot of people travel a long way to go & see it. I don't believe you can say the same for a street race in Sydney, or Perth for that matter.

SA is a good example of what happens when you have a street event at the expense of one at a purpose built circuit. Fortunately over here in WA there is the prospect of a good result for the local circuit. (New pits that no one really cares about but more importantly a circuit extension ) This is mostly because the state govt told Cochrant to shove his street race.

I should have made myself a bit clearer with regard to NSW. I didn't mean the participants I meant the spectators. Most of the crowd figures for V8's and many other events are dire. Bathurst is Bathurst. Alot of people travel a long way to go & see it. I don't believe you can say the same for a street race in Sydney, or Perth for that matter.

Eastern Creek crowd figures are very average, but that's because the place is crap for spectating. Oran Park on the other hand has great crowds, always has, because you can see most of the cirrcuit, most of the time, from most spectator spots.

Cheers

Gary

CAMS suck for giving these temporary street circuits a track licence in the first place. No permanent circuit would get a licence if its safety was as compramised as all street circuits inevitably are, double dealing dollar chasing is the go, stuff grass roots motorsport eh CAMS.

Thank the gods of motorsport for AASA.

Yeah just imagine what $30mil could do for either oran park or eastern creek. $30 mil into eastern creek could actually build some nice spectator stands that give a view of more than just 1 corner.

Yeah just imagine what $30mil could do for either oran park or eastern creek. $30 mil into eastern creek could actually build some nice spectator stands that give a view of more than just 1 corner.

:thumbsup:

:banana::yes::yes::yes:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I thought that might be the case, thats what I'll start saving for. Thanks for the info 
    • Ps i found the below forum and it seems to be the same scenario Im dealing with. Going to check my ECU coolant temp wire tomorrow    From NICOclub forum: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Thu Apr 11, 2013 7:23 am I am completely lost on this. Car ran perfectly fine when I parked it at the end of the year. I took the engine out and painted the engine bay, and put a fuel cell with an inline walbro 255 instead of the in tank unit I had last year. After reinstalling everything, the engine floods when the fuel pump primes. if i pull the fuel pump fuse it'll start, and as soon as I put the fuse back in it starts running ridiculously rich. I checked the tps voltage, and its fine. Cleaned the maf as it had some dust from sitting on a shelf all winter, fuel pressure is correct while running, but wont fire until there is less than 5psi in the lines. The fuel lines are run correctly. I have found a few threads with the same problem but no actual explanation of what fixed it, the threads just ended. Any help would be appreciated. Rb25det s1 walbro255 fuel pump nismo fpr holset hx35 turbo fmic 3" exhaust freddy intake manifold q45tb q45 maf   Re: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Fri Apr 12, 2013 5:07 am No, I didn't. I found the problem though. There was a break in one of the ecu coolant temp sensor wires. Once it was repaired it fired right up with no problems. I would have never thought a non working coolant temp sensor would have caused such an issue.
    • Hi sorry late reply I didnt get a chance to take any pics (my mechanics on the other side of the city) but the plugs were fouled from being too rich. I noticed the MAF wasn't genuine, so I replaced it with a genuine green label unit. I also swapped in a different ignitor, but the issue remains. I've narrowed it down a bit now: - If I unplug and reconnect the fuel lines and install fresh spark plugs, the car starts right up and runs perfectly. Took it around the block with no issues - As soon as I shut it off and try to restart, it won't start again - Fuel pressure while cranking is steady around 40 psi, injectors have good spray, return line is clear, and the FPR vacuum is working. It just seems like it's getting flooded after the first start I unplugged coolant sensors to see if its related to ECU flooding but that didnt make a difference. Im thinking its related to this because this issue only started happening after fixing coolant leaks and replacing the bottom part of the stock manifolds coolant pipe. My mechanic took off the inlet to get to get to do these repairs. My mechanics actually just an old mate who's retired now so ill be taking it to a different mechanic who i know has exp with RBs to see if they find anything. If you have any ideas please send em lll give it a try. Ive tried other things like swapping the injectors, fuel rail, different fuel pressure regs, different ignitor, spark plugs, comp test and MAF but the same issue persists.
    • My return flow is custom and puts the return behind the reo, instead of at the bottom. All my core is in the air flow, rather than losing some of it up behind the reo. I realise that the core really acts more as a spiky heatsink than as a constant rate heat exchanger, and that therefore size is important.... but mine fits everything I needed and wanted without having to cut anything, and that's worth something too. And there won't be a hot patch of core up behind the reo after every hit, releasing heat back into the intake air.
    • There is a really fun solution to this problem, buy a Haltech (or ECU of your choice) and put the MAF in the bin.  I'm assuming your going to want more power in future, so you'll need to get the ECU at some stage. I'd put the new MAF money towards the new ECU. 
×
×
  • Create New...