Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 103
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Off the speedo in the good old VS "commonwhore", so whateva that is 240??? As someone else has mentioned not the kinda car u wanna do it in as they handle like a BOAT!! Or as "ndr" put it..... like a sausage in a non-stick frying pan!!!:lol:

Skyline, 180... speed delimiter...:)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/2283-speed/page/3/#findComment-42788
Share on other sites

Before I got the skyline I pulled 258 kph in my Astra MK II Turbo, she was pulling 225 bhp at the fly... and nothing fell off...

Attached my Calibra Turbo in France ..... (notice I'm changing lanes while taking the photo, and its in mph not kph)

I was trying to catch my mate but he just pi%$ed off into the distance, his car was an Astra MK II Turbo with 315 bhp at the fly.

www.gsi.fr.fm

All good fun !!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/2283-speed/page/3/#findComment-42824
Share on other sites

Um, in my old Starlet, speed limiter cut in about 195km/h or so (on the track :D ) Car felt fine, very stable, unlike my passenger's heart rate. He had never been over 140km/h! Probably only had about 10-15 km/h left.

My 180sx speed limited to 190 or so, still pulling quite strongly. Once I get more boost and no speed limiter, I will let you know.

Next time I get on a track.

:D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/2283-speed/page/3/#findComment-42841
Share on other sites

240 kmh in a 300zx TT on Natone straight Targa 2000

250 or there abouts ( was a bit busy)in a 32 GTR across the top on Mt Arrowsmith 2001.

Apart from relying completely on the pace notes and navigator ( cos your going over crests and getting air), it didn't feel that fast

Both cars were rock steady, but good suspension and tyres helps.

Ken

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/2283-speed/page/3/#findComment-42923
Share on other sites

Originally posted by polishstorm

i got busted doing 267kph on the parkway (canberra) in my 76 celica mods were 2jz gte from 95 supra with 6 sp box. only reason i got busted was by those damn mobile speed cameras. but it was well worth it.

*drool*:D

I think fm109's are rated at V as they are pretty good tyres.

Id hate to blow a tyre at 200Km/hr OUCH

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/2283-speed/page/3/#findComment-42949
Share on other sites

250kph in an 930 turbo .

220 in the line

220 in an N/A 92 celica with a 3s-ge (in europe) was doing that speed for 10 minutes.

160 in a petrol toyota 4 runner.

and before you say they dont go that fast the car was in neutral down a long very steep hill (never again)

199 in my zl failane

220 in sv3800

meggala

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/2283-speed/page/3/#findComment-42961
Share on other sites

Yer i regularly exercise my speedo needle .. its a part of maintenance .. hehe...

I get usualy get it to 240ks or so, doesnt feel like its struggling either, but i havent tested past 240 yet ...

The main thing i notice is how hard on the brakes it is when u try to slow down, this is why they have aftermarket brakes for sale i supose ... Feels quite stable as well...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/2283-speed/page/3/#findComment-42986
Share on other sites

Originally posted by polishstorm

i got busted doing 267kph on the parkway (canberra) in my 76 celica mods were 2jz gte from 95 supra with 6 sp box. only reason i got busted was by those damn mobile speed cameras. but it was well worth it.

HOLY CRAP!

you got busted doing that on the Parkway?? That's 167 over the limit...what happened?? I would have thought they'd take your licence and never give it back :eek:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/2283-speed/page/3/#findComment-43024
Share on other sites

yeah i had to go to court and the magistrate asked me why i was going so fast and i told her that i wasnt. my little 76 celica was "stock standard" (yaeh for a supra hehehe) and was lucky to reach 160kph little own 267kph. i argued that the camera was not accurate and they dropped the charge from 267 to 15kph over.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/2283-speed/page/3/#findComment-43218
Share on other sites

Originally posted by polishstorm

yeah i had to go to court and the magistrate asked me why i was going so fast and i told her that i wasnt. my little 76 celica was "stock standard" (yaeh for a supra hehehe) and was lucky to reach 160kph little own 267kph. i argued that the camera was not accurate and they dropped the charge from 267 to 15kph over.

LOL!!!!

wouldnt they have been smart enough to ask to see the car that waz being driven?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/2283-speed/page/3/#findComment-43269
Share on other sites

Originally posted by polishstorm

LOL!!!

yeah but you how smart public servants are and how hard they want to work. no offence to anybody that is

coudlnt be that hard... 'can we see the car u were using'

lol

L.A.Z.Y.

:D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/2283-speed/page/3/#findComment-43441
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...