Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i will be keen sled, but i should mention i will be on my quad....

can that big fuel guzzling twin turb beat a 4 cyl?

you better have your front wheels in the air if you hope to keep up.

i certainly will have

lol Darren, I think the 2.7 tonne I'm hauling may give your quad a slight advantage ;)

  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Brendan, so it was your Stag' at BW! I thought that might of been your beast. I had a look at the spec's list a week or so back (whilst lending a hand at BW and having just taken my 33 down there) thought it sounded familiar.

Sorry to hear (see, smell, and get gassed out by) the cracked block issue ;) She was looking like a smoke machine for a while. Poor old Andrew, he pulled the head apart twice in the process of that job (initial and then to diagnose the issue) and then Troy got a go, along with the bottom end. I had a look at the crack in the block, makes me think it was a little 'unhealthy' prior to the latest mod's.

And here I was suggesting for you to 'do' the bottom end whilst you were planning to do the head... I didn't mean that kind of 'do'!

Brendan, so it was your Stag' at BW! I thought that might of been your beast. I had a look at the spec's list a week or so back (whilst lending a hand at BW and having just taken my 33 down there) thought it sounded familiar.

Sorry to hear (see, smell, and get gassed out by) the cracked block issue :P She was looking like a smoke machine for a while. Poor old Andrew, he pulled the head apart twice in the process of that job (initial and then to diagnose the issue) and then Troy got a go, along with the bottom end. I had a look at the crack in the block, makes me think it was a little 'unhealthy' prior to the latest mod's.

And here I was suggesting for you to 'do' the bottom end whilst you were planning to do the head... I didn't mean that kind of 'do'!

lol at your lungs, sorry ;) I know, what a head-f'k

yeah, but very happy with the outcome.

prior to going in the car was faultless, honestly. as far as I know....

boostworxs are awesome, I wasnt worried about the time (7.5 weeks) but the family was stuck-up me

looked after me car-wise and cost-wise, and again, very happy with the outcome

will do more tuning time in a cple months time, prior to next service + the additional fuel mockup

oh- whats that about the block? maybe I dont know something , , , lol

Ha-ha no harm done mate. Yeah I felt sorry for you, and the guys trying to sort out the issues.

Shaun is as good as they come in the performance workshop game. His Boostworx business certainy gets busy, but I guess that to be expected when you're recognised as being a decent and sensibly priced outfit.

Maybe it was another bottom end with a cracked block? I knew your RB had issues after the head work, and I was checking out a cracked RB block sitting on the eng' stand near your Stag' on the hoist. Then again, given the number of RB motors that are in at BW at any given time it might have been totally unrelated to your beast.

Anyway, it's up and running now and that's the main thing. And with a bit more work (bigger turbo) you should start to see the benefits of that head work.

Been investigating head work and polishing the ports is bad due to the fact the air sticks to the smooth surface creating drag whereas a rougher surface creates a thing (cannot think of the correct word) that lets the air flow more freely. Like the rough skin of a shark helps it go through the water without creating much drag.

Was told to leave the ports with the machine marks or shoot peen them with glass beads to get the disired effect.

that applys more too a n/a motor reason on a n/a if the ports are too smooth the fuel goes into the chambers as droplets where if the ports have a semi machined surface it atomises the fuel more into a mist . this also applys more to carby motors than injected ones where the fuel is a finer spray anyway . with forced induction the fuel goes in a shitload faster than been drwn in on a n/a motor.

and too the guys trying to sell me there big turbos lol def not needed in my case but a nice steel wheel highflow would suit my car and mods nicely -)

All i can say Dean is Soft....

very soft...

time to live a little me thinks, mid life crisis or not a highmount gt35 will make you feel 10 yrs younger.

yeah i know dangerman but 20 yrs of racing speedway has calmed me down on the road somewhat time to live a little lol ive done most of it and had fun now just is relax time :-)

Been investigating head work and polishing the ports is bad due to the fact the air sticks to the smooth surface creating drag whereas a rougher surface creates a thing (cannot think of the correct word) that lets the air flow more freely. Like the rough skin of a shark helps it go through the water without creating much drag.

Was told to leave the ports with the machine marks or shoot peen them with glass beads to get the desired effect.

parasitic drag is the word i think???. air flow and liquid dynamics , if its too smooth it actually beads the fuel up , not ideal for sure. you want the best fuel atomization you can get, like a super fine mist ?

this is very true, intakes work better if left glass beaded/sand blasted texture inside .but port matched to the gaskets and intake plenum and all burs removed, extrude honing is a great way to fix up the head but not sure if anyone does it here in Adelaide? (kinda like shooting sandy toothpaste with extreme pressure thru the ports smoothing the walls )

the exhaust side needs to be polished up and flowed , also port matched to gaskets and extractors ,

also by cc'ing the head to balance the power in each cylinder and polishing the combustion chamber to keep the carbon buildups minimized, saves the carbon buildup from misfiring over time or even jamming in the ring lands like abrasives

tidy up the head gasket to match the water jackets as well. a little bur/ slag in the water jacket can cause a lot of hotspots on turbo cars. creates a spot of bubbles which dont transfer heat out of the head correctly, cavitaing the water pump at high rpm if severe, all easy to do for the best insurance and head performance

when my head is due I'll port my own and take photos of it for ya, later this year prob.

I've done a lot of them in my past for formula fords ,datto, formula VW cars. for those of you who want to do it just take your time ...it's not hard to of good info here for the DIY

http://www.sa-motorsports.com/diyport.aspx

Edited by sapphiregraphics
  • 4 weeks later...

The 'thing' the rougher surface will create is a thicker boundary layer. The boundary layer is where viscous effects dominate over fluid flow effects, and if you're looking to minimise the amount of effort required to move the intake charge through the head, you want the boundary layer to be as thin as possible (hence the head as smooth as possible).

This is just basic fluid dynamics and is only really half the story. As mentioned previously, the thicker boundary layer MAY prevent fuel from condensing on the walls, I'm not really too sure and there are more qualified people here to answer that. I thought this was more an issue with carby fed cars, to the point where a lot of old cars had their entire intake manifold heated to encourage the fuel to evaporate off the walls.

Polish it all up if you want all out 'top' end performance.

If you wish to improve economy and low end torque for a bee's dick loss of top end performance roughen up the inlet. Nothing 0.2psi can't fix. :)

Edited by TheRogue
Polish it all up if you want all out 'top' end performance.

If you wish to improve economy and low end torque for a bee's dick loss of top end performance roughen up the inlet. Nothing 0.2psi can't fix. :banana:

How will a rougher surface on the inlet improve economy and low end torque? I'm not saying it wont, I'm just saying u haven't really explained your statement and/or given any evidence to back it up.

Also just a thought, someone mentioned previously the golf ball and shark skin rough surfaces that reduce drag.......just for the record these are different scenario's to flows within an engine because in one case your talking about external flows and the other is considering an internal flow.

Drag is bad. Drag should be reduced where possible as long as there aren't negative side effects.

There are two types of drag, form drag and skin friction drag. In the case of the shark and the golf ball, the rougher surface will increase skin friction drag (because the rough surface makes the boundary layer turbulent, and the skin friction coefficient is larger for a turbulent boundary layer).

SO WHY DO THIS if it increases drag??? Because in these examples it can reduce form drag by a lot, which more than offsets the increase in skin friction drag.

HOW? The turbulent boundary layer delays flow separation, which is the main cause of form drag.

So if we're talking about an internal flow scenario (where form drag doesn't really apply), such as fluid flow in a pipe for example, a smoother surface will always have less drag than a rough one. Period.

If people are getting good results by 'roughing' up the inlet, it has nothing to do with drag reduction, its due to other effects.

Edited by mind_riot

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I will rebutt this and the preceding point from Dose....but without doing any calcs to demonstrate anything and without knowing that I am right or wrong. But... The flow capacity of a fluid transfer system is not limited by the smallest orifice or section of conduit in that system, unless it is drastically smaller than the rest of the system. OK, I use the word drastically perhaps with too much emphasis, but let's drill down on what I really mean. The flow capacity of the system is the result of the sum of the restrictions of the entire system. So, to make an extreme example, if you have a network with 3" pipe everywhere (and let's say a total length of only a few metres) and that 12mm ID restriction of the oil filter connection being the obvious restriction, then for any given amount of pressure available, the vast majority of all the pressure drop in the system is going to occur in the 12mm restriction. But.... increase the length of the 3" pipeline to, say 1000m, and suddenly the pipe pressure loss will likely add up to either be in the same order of magnitude, possibly even exceeding that of the 12mm restriction. Now the 12mm restriction starts to matter less. Translate this to the actual engine, actual oil cooler hose sizing, etc etc, and perhaps: The pressure loss caused by flowing through the narrow section (being the 12mm oil filter port, and perhaps any internal engine oil flow pathways associated with it) is a certain number. The pressure loss through, say, -12 hoses out to the cooler and back is negligible, but The pressure loss through -10 hoses out to the cooler, at the exact same length as the above, starts to become a decent fraction of the loss through the 12mm stuff at the filter port. Maybe even it starts to exceed it. I could actually do these calcs if I knew 1) how much oil was actually flowing in the line, 2) gave enough of a f**k to do things that I hate doing for work, voluntarily for a hypothetical discussion. Anyway - I reiterate. It's not the narrowest port that necessarily determines how much it can all flow. It is the sum. A long enough length of seemingly fat enough pipe can still cause more loss than a semmingly dominant small bore restriction.
    • To pick up what Dose is putting down. Not a lot of point running a huge hose if the motor is still restricted to the smaller size... It's only capable of flowing so much at that point...   *Waits for GTSBoy to come in and bring in the technicalities of length of pipe, and additional restriction from wall friction etc etc*
    • Hooley Dooley these things have some history! If i sell them they will need a certificate of providence to prove they have been in the hands of verified RB20 royalty! They have been stored in a plastic tub, away from sunlight and moisture. They are in mint condition. And they will stay that way, as i have sprung the money for a set of shockworks coilovers. I'm just working on getting them in at the moment, after rebushing the rear of the car, and while the subframe was out i welded in the GKtech reinforcement bracing as well.  They will get a workout at Ararat King of The Hill in November. I ran 48s on the short course there a few months ago, and i am hoping with new bushes and shocks in the rear i can launch a bit harder. There was a fair bit of axle tramp when i tried too hard off the line. a few of the corners had dips mid way which also made the car feel a bit unsettled, hopefully this will help there too.   
    • Food for thought, the stock oil filter thread is a 3/4-16 UNF, which has an ID of about 10 to 12mm (according to ChatGPT lol). Now compare than to an 10AN, which has an ID of about 14mm (Raceworks is 14.2mm, Speed flow is 14.27mm).  
    • Yep, totally get that. However hooking in for Generator back up is only a few hundred bucks for the wiring. You could put a couple of those in (for different circuits explicitly) and run a couple of baby generators. Bonus, you can balance them across different circuits, and now have backups in your backup. I'm looking at buying places that won't even have water etc, and I don't mind the idea of getting off the electric grid either, even with everything you've said. This country already has enough power outages that even the mains grid isn't that reliable anymore. I do agree though on spending a bit more to get better gear, and to add some extra redundancy in to the system too.
×
×
  • Create New...