Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

http://www1.biz.biglobe.ne.jp/~GT-R/autech32.html

have a look at this if your interested in the Autech RB26DE

it has some damn nice extractors, 6 individual throttles(!)

has an r32 body shell, though its a bit heavy for my like'n, 1480 kg

that figure sounds more like an r32 GTr

Im a huge na skyline fan, i would freakin love this car !!

  • Replies 321
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Oh and by the way, the basic specs are (to the best of my ability)

4580~1695~1360 mm

ƒƒzƒC[ƒ‹ƒx[ƒX„@@@@@2615 mm

ƒweight„@@@@@@@@1480kg

ƒengine„@@@@@@RB26DE

ƒpower stroke„@@@@@@@@220PS /6800rpm

ƒtork„@@@@@@@25.0kgm/5200rpm

ƒwheels„@@@@@@@@@205/55R16 88V

For us engols speakers:

It goes with 32 R and as for NISSAN which is overtaken, 4 door editions GT whose request from the part owner extra troop is many - it announces 4 doors Gts-4 of 32 where even R you can say based AUTECH VERSION. With the photograph it is understood a little and perhaps, the ‚¸ leprosy, but the ornament has become SKYLINE26. On the rear the spoiler for 4 doors is attached with option.

Å‚o—Í:220PS/6800rpm

Å‘åƒgƒ‹ƒN:25.0kgm/5200rpm.

The rich torque which extremely occurs low from revolution, made nimble takeoff acceleration possible. The power which reacts to linear in throttle work. Passing power peak, the smooth blowing rising which continues. It is low, you can taste the good quality of the natural air intake engine which reacts sensitively to the movement of the accelerator from the rotary limits to the high rotary limits. Basic mechanism the ‚× - to designate RB26DETT which has the result as a racing engine as ƒX, the intake, as for exhaust, the camshaft and the piston etc. the Otech special made. Special tuning for this engine is included in the control computer. As for exhaust manifold stainless steel make isometric flexible pipe. Exhaust interference is avoided, charm twin cam sound is given Qin coming out. Actualization of the high braking efficiency where it corresponds to the power efficiency which is superior. In order reduction of unsprung weight and to increase heat dissipation characteristic, the caliper of the ƒAƒmƒŒƒ~ alloy make - with it has done. Front opposition 4 piston, rear opposition 2 piston. As for the brake rotor, the turbo fin model large-sized ventilated disk which has the sliding surface pin hole. As for rotor diameter, front: 296mm and rear: 292mm. Controlling this powerful braking effort effectively is ABS (the anti lock brake system). With control of synthesis with the drive system, ABS original antiskid efficiency and the braking efficiency which in the road surface which the snow ˜G and the like it is easy to slide are superior are shown. As for suspension layout 4 wheel multiple link suspension. It has made the specification whose rigidity is high making provision for the increase of 4WD conversion and suspension input. In addition Bridgestone EXPEDIA S-01 (205/55 R16 88v) you prepared in the private tire. As for tuning of suspension system, low as for the medium speed limits the cornering efficiency where in the high-speed limits are high from the first it has been compatible the riding comfort which is superior beautifully. The sense of security and the mild riding comfort which feeling inhales to the last exactly in the road surface and is attached. If crew-member everyone tastes, there is a real value of this underside in very the sense of relief which is not.

(From catalog part excerpt)

Guest neoGT-25

THAT LOOKS MAD!

and thanks for the advice guys... so to get it right, the 2.25" would be more responsive than the 2.5"? could you guys please explain? :)

and also should i get stainless?

thanks all... byes ;)

PS: Im getting a datto 1600 as a runaround car :burnout: (haha ill put a SR20DET in it ;)) not really :)

well the exaust should be stainless because alot of water vapour goes through the exaust, and if it isnt rust proof then eventually you will have leaks in the pipe work, this will make the car loud as hell.

While gettin the 2.25 will increase response over the 2.5 because it has less back pressure, or in other words it should have a bit more torque down low in the rev range. This addition of torque will make the car more fun and responsive to drive. It will also has less drone in the cabin.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi...so a "development" here aswell The swap is "done" and car went "test drive" BUT it seems the clutch(maybe gearbox?) is a little bit sad? I bought this clutch kit https://justjap.com/products/xtreme-heavy-duty-organic-clutch-flywheel-kit-nissan-skyline-r31-r32-r33-push-type "Problem" is that the first gear is hard to put into and it seems that the clutch is not disengaged. It was not the problem with the old clutch...(or like sometime the first gear would not get as easy specialy when the fluid was cold) So? Can it be like...bad "install" or is the clutch wrong ((it should not have been) i done research to get the right one) Or is this "normal" with new clutch and needs to be break in? 
    • @Duncan I can try  and thanks i did not thought about VIN and part numbers for 33/34. @GTSBoy yeah it looks like iam gonna do that  
    • Forgot to include this but this is the mid section of my steering rack that looks like it has a thread/can be turned with that notch mentioned in the post:
    • Hey everyone, Wanted to pick some brains about this issue I'm having with rebuilding my 33 rack (PN is 49001-19U05). All of the tutorials/videos I've seen online are either R34 or S Chassis racks which seem to be pretty straightforward to disassemble but this process doesnt carry over to my rack. Few of the key differences that I've noted The pinion shaft on the other racks bolt on with 3 torx bolts: Whereas my rack bolts on with 2 allen head bolts: These changes are pretty inconsequential but the main difference is how you pull the actual rack out of the housing. The other skyline/s chassis racks can be taken out by tapping the rack out of the body with a socket and it just slides right out. I'm unable to do that with my rack because there's a hard stop at the end that doesn't let the seal/shaft be tapped out. Can also see a difference in the other end of the rack where mine has a notch that looks like you're able to use a big wrench to unthread 2 halves of the rack whereas the other racks are just kinda set in with a punch. My rack: Other racks: TLDR; Wanted to know if anyone has rebuilt this specific model of steering rack for the R33 and if there were any steps to getting it done easier or if I should just give this to a professional to get done. Sorry if this post is a bit messy, first one I've done.
    • I would just put EBC back on the "I would not use their stuff" pile and move on.
×
×
  • Create New...