Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

It is going to happen every where when people advertise buy this modified car and all you have to do is pass rego in your state.

Try and rego some of those cars after next month.

I have to get my car over the pits this week after being registered in NSW for for 18 months and even then I am worried.

  • Replies 153
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I havent read the complete thread.Im in NSW.

My understanding ids that[with major buisness group involvement] the shonkies have been pushed out of low volume schemes and into the enthusiest schemes.

Im an enthusiest so i should be able to import and register my car.No the scheme is to keep small car sales yard in buisness.

My mate works for an engineer that is setting up Raws workshop.Its B/S.clients of theirs are buying 1989 models 100 at a time for storage. I dont know why but 1988 models are of no interest.

I have R31 and R32 chasis number by month http://www.geocities.com/davehoos/TWO.html

http://www.geocities.com/davehoos/cnor31.html

as it is time consuming to type this i also have R31 R32 R33 N14 C32 and soon parts books on CD with details,and some early manuals

.parts book 910 jap,european.T12 T72 european odd and sods.

P/s when i imported the passage it had to be older than 15yrs.

I was told that you have to have a car 2yrs before they give a bit when transfering from states.

a work mate got a WA regoed familia [no complience]and they said no here in NSW untill they read the act over the phone on cross state transferes.

http://www.dotars.gov.au/transreg/vsb/vsb_10.htm

Our Reference: L1999/0719

VEHICLES IMPORTED AS 15 YEARS OR OLDER

We wish to advise that:

Vehicles 15 years or older must be at least 15 years old at time of making an application. For example if the vehicle is manufactured in the month of November 1988, then an application cannot be made until November 2003.

Regulation 17 of the Motor Vehicle Standards Regulations provides that:

The Minister must approve an application to import a nonstandard road vehicle or a vehicle that does not

have an identification plate if the vehicle is 15 or more years old.

It is the applicant’s responsibility to ensure that vehicles meet the requirement to be 15 or more years old at the time of

application. It has become apparent that many applicants are expecting to import vehicles early in the new year under

the provisions of Regulation 17. To meet the requirements of the regulation vehicles must be at least 15 years old at the

time of application. Vehicles that do not meet that requirement are not eligible to be imported.

From 1 January 2004, applications to import vehicles that are 15 or more years old will need to include evidence to confirm the

age of the vehicle. Acceptable evidence would include (but not be limited to) confirmation from the vehicle manufacturer of

evidence of first date of registration. Applications that do not include this information will be rejected, unless it is obvious

from the vehicle model concerned that it would meet the requirements of Regulation 17 (for example, if the vehicle was a

Model T Ford).

I just bought a skyline today, r33 gts-t and I'm getting it complience for $3k, gets here in 30 days ;) And i talked to the complience workshop regarding the 15 yr rule, and all it cost is $750 to for them to complience - well this was based on a r32 quote.

You guys are getting quotes which are pretty high i think ...

I'm in sunny queensland, i realise imports are a little cheaper here comparded to like melbourne - I'm basing this like on tradingpost prices. The number of imports in brisbane, especially in the sunnybank area is ridiculous, on the south side itself theres about 10 japanese performance importers.

arh well ....

queensland i think 750 is a rip off

because all they do is register the thing (i know they might do something maybe start it up and drive it around the block)

nsw for your 1-2 grand generally you actually get something done to your 15 year old import (eg side intrusion bars, seat belts and the engineers ticket yad yad yad)

just my thoughts

pete

Spoke to the person who drafted the "compliance" rules for WA today. This shit just keeps getting better...Not only will each car require an engineers sign off to vouch for the compliance of lights etc to ADRs they will also require an emissions test at Orbital at around 400 bucks a test...

Jash

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
    • Yes they do. For some maybe. But for those used the most by abusers, ie Skylines, the numbers are known. The stock eyebrow height for R32/3 Skylines is about 365/375mm or thereabouts. The minimum such heights are recorded in adjacent columns in the database.
×
×
  • Create New...