Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

interesting... wats the idle like.. i assume you'd probaly have troubles getting it down to 1000-1100 range with injectors of that size? than again.. the cams in that thing would be rather large and probaly prefer an idle around the 1200rpm mark?

Back to this question trent.. how does it idle with such large injectors?

Edited by Jaffar
  • Replies 374
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Back to this question trent.. how does it idle with such large injectors?

like a bridgeport rotary (brup, brup, brup, brup) ..... real nice rotational lump... best sounding RB idle i have ever heard.. about 1200rpm.

Edited by URAS
Someone's a gay, squealing gimp then! LOL!

HAHAHA that was the owner (200sx), a good mate.... not me. video removed for fear he may bash me :P

http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=CWom840WOhM

Edited by URAS

nice! it really would be one hell of a ride from 5,000rpm to 6,000rpm it sure piles on a whole lot of power thereafter. good result mate. :cool:

PS, I drove past your house on saturday as I was down that way, I was going to call and drop in but missed you you non phone answering bad man!

RB20's aren't capable of that power.

Well, no-one's arguing any more!

A conservative tune of 277rwkw on 1.25 bar says otherwise knackers.....

Made more than Athid's white S15 on the same boost level........

BTW don't eat all that hat of yours at once :cool:

Edited by Wheezy

Christ! People just don't get sarcasm even when it's jumping up and down in front of them.

But now you've kicked it off, the car this thread is about 'should' run some serious numbers but neither the tuner nor the owner are on here claiming 9's!

Have a smile and a Coke and cheer the hell up!

:cool:

Christ! People just don't get sarcasm even when it's jumping up and down in front of them.

But now you've kicked it off, the car this thread is about 'should' run some serious numbers but neither the tuner nor the owner are on here claiming 9's!

Have a smile and a Coke and cheer the hell up!

:P

:cool:

All in good fun!!!

nice! it really would be one hell of a ride from 5,000rpm to 6,000rpm it sure piles on a whole lot of power thereafter. good result mate. :cool:

PS, I drove past your house on saturday as I was down that way, I was going to call and drop in but missed you you non phone answering bad man!

ahh bugger ive moved closer to the shop.....

Quite the opposite, champ. I see you have misread/misinterpreted what I meant. No matter.

My point was that it's silly to make assumptions and guesstimates without knowing or at least having a pretty bloody good idea at what the other variables are.

I don't exactly understand where you have gone with this. My comment was:

1000cc injectors should be capable of exactly 1200 engine hp. Considering he would only be making 1100-1150 engine hp...it's high but not impossible.

I said 'should be capable of'. I don't see how I have made an assumption or guesstimate? Someone was saying you can't make 1000whp using 1000cc injectors. I did a calculation and found that it could still be possible so pointed that out. No assumptions or guesstimates there mate.

If you really really want me to, I will calculate the exact amount. I will also list the common types of fuels including their burn rates and tell you exactly how many CC's each one needs to flow to make that much hp.

Or you can just accept the fact that all I was saying was 1000cc injectors could still do the job.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...