Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Sorry, just guessed.

no probs dude, these are the 2nd set of eyelids ive had on the car, the first set were copies of the c-west style i think, and then i found the East Bear ones so i got them and sold the others.

is this necessary? each to their own, back on topic, the thread was going well for the first few pages with minimal chit chat and plenty of kits to choose from... shall we keep it that way?

For those interested, here are some more pics of Cara's kit, it reminds me of the C-West front bar.

post-40562-1253570847_thumb.jpg post-40562-1253570853_thumb.jpg

thanks dude, it is all about personal taste. i dont have many people tell me they think the car looks like crap or hideous, its had quite a good response thru shows and displays. my car represents me, and i dont really care what anyone thinks, i drive it, and ive built it for ME no one else :)

also with the pics of that bar, the nose isnt as long (at the top), that was one thing that caught my attention, as to me it looked a tad bit "veilside"ish. and the bar didnt have the bits on the sides either. we had to put in the side indicator mounts as the bar didnt have any :(

pics of the bar i got:

13092009542.jpg

13092009543.jpg

13092009544.jpg

IMG_4748.jpg

one of the nicest front bumpers iv seen other than the nismo z tune: http://www.importmonster.com.au/view?url=h...ype%20mv%20PIAA

This is an Abflug front bar, they have some out there kits, not really a fan personally, here are some more pics, i dont mind the side skirts

post-40562-1253761484_thumb.jpg post-40562-1253761493_thumb.jpg

post-40562-1253761499_thumb.jpg post-40562-1253761507_thumb.jpg

I don't know why people are complaining about that miss34's CM4 front bar......

it looks alot better than some of the other ones i've seen

The Uras front bar makes me wanna sing "I'm Mr Plough, that's my name, that name again is Mr Plough".

The Bomex one makes it look more like a supra with a kit.

and some of the others eg. Nismo, look like they are standard factory kits.

plus it's a bit different to the usual boxy skyline bars, without being spaz like a Veilside.

Thinking of getting one myself now =)

anywhere i can get standard r34 gtr side skirts from?

Nissan perhaps, be prepared to pay through the nose for them.

Or try calling a few of the shops mentioned in the thread, DMD, carmate, PSI parts perhaps

But if you have a Gtt as per under your username, then be aware that gtr skirts will not fit without significant customizing

carmate, DMD, psi parts will be selling fiberglass ones.. if you are after originals then nissan it is.. or find someone selling some off.. but for genuine plastic ones they won't be cheap

ps post a pic of your car with the rear qtrs as there are lots on here who want to see that conversion done.. and what the cost was?

nissan want $2,500. carmate dont have standard one's what r the links for dmd n psi parts? why wont they fit? i have gtr front guards and rear quarters im only missing the side skirts to complete the puzzle

If my memory serves me correctly, the skirts are different lengths from gtt to gtr

ps post a pic of your car with the rear qtrs as there are lots on here who want to see that conversion done.. and what the cost was?

i put a couple of pics up in my gallery i have fiber glass side skirts but the issue is it sits way to low compared to the rear bar with rear pods. the cost so far i wouldnt have a clue and dont want to know lol. when the cars complete i will post cost.

post-27832-1254371970.jpg

  • 2 weeks later...
hey guys i am new to these forums but i have a qestion about a bodykit and wheather it will be posssible to fit it to my 1998 gt four r34 skyline 4 doors i have attached the picture below in my opinion this is the best looking gtr ive seen

Fark, that's giving me a horn! Do you know what kit it is?

Fark, that's giving me a horn! Do you know what kit it is?

its a z-tune

some copies may exist but its not easy finding one for a gtt, i believe empire aero are in the process of making this kit for a gtt and gtr

*sigh* it's not a z-tune.

It's just a nismo kit. I believe everything was answered in the replies afterwards if you read the thread

ah woops, lol i should have actually opened the pic, im sure i have a pic of a silver gtr on a similar angle that happens to be a z-tune, hence my mistake, that said, it was all answered afterward

Sup there mate~ I need a bit of a help. If you really drive an r34 gtr, and have your stock front bumper just measure the height and width of the two vents below the turn lights. If you didn't get what I mean these two are beside the intercooler vents.

>[__]< |_Intercooler_|> [__] < These :(:D

Thanks dont forget

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...