Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Link http://www.nagtroc.org/forums/index.php?sh...=25361&st=0

A couple of things. Is the transmission made by the crowd who made them for the Veyron? Disconnecting the traction control voids the transmission warranty? A bit rough and perhaps unsustainable if there is a manufacturing fault or the transmission is not fit for its intended purpose?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/239115-us-transmission-failures/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 88
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Well, the box definately has some form of torque limiting feature built into it's smarts, because all the vehicles that have had Cobb tuners etc installed, show an extra 50 to 100kw on the dyno, but run 11.2's and 11.3's just like a stock one. The gearbox is both the best and worst feature of the vehicle imo.

Love the way it works, but I can't help thinking it may hamper really big hp applications. Of course, the shift protocols wouild also require remapping if and when they get around the torque limiting, and then there's the question whether those clutches and/or internals can handle more grunt?

Interesting times coming I reckon......

My impression is that there is some serious transmission abuse going on, which with any car will eventually lead to a failure. It seems that there are a number of other make owners in the US who are seriously pissed that the R35 has received so much attention and they are doing their best to discredit the car that is taking attention away from their cars.

The various targa R35's in AU must be giving the transmission a serious workout, no failures yet are there? Good test for a transmission I'd guess.

No, plenty of geartrain noise in first gear, but it's always been in the car. We decided against using LC during the event though, as we wanted stabilty control on and you cannot have both, and the car gets away very nicely anyway.

Over a 25 klm stage the transmission oil temp didn't creep over 115 degrees that I saw, and it was just awesome all the time. No failures as yet (hopefully never!) in the geartrain, even though the car left the ground at times without any throttle lift in 2nd, 3rd, 5th and 6th.....

I'd like to know what gear that is thats stripped in that link, I'm not familiar with the 'box to know just by looking. Any ideas?

Edited by Marlin

the thing is, doing these launch-controlled starts is so much harder on the transmission than any race track driving will expose it to (super high oil temps not withstanding).

just think about the physics here- it's a 1740kg car, with wiiiiide&grippy tyres (140 treadwear rating from the factory), a super-fast response AWD system that almost instantly goes to 50:50 torque split, and an engine that makes at least 580Nm of torque at launch revs. doesn't take a real braniac to see where this is heading...

i think the problem is thus: thinking back to high-school engineering science, metals have whats called 'plastic' and 'elastic' strain limits. the 'elastic' limit is how har it can deform and return to the original shape (think of flexing a metal ruler gently), whereas the 'plastic' limit is how far the object can be deformed before it fails catastrophically; though it won't return to the original shape after the 'elastic' limit threshold is exceeded (again, think bending a ruler until a permanent crease forms)

what i think is happening with these R35's that have had gearbox failures, is that the owners that spend all day smoking everyones arse off at the traffic-light GP are taking certain teeth on the 1st gear gogs up to and past the elastic limit with every launch. eventually most, if not all, the teeth on 1st become deformed past the elastic limit, and the next time the car is launched with the cogs in the fatally weakend spot, it just lets go.

that's my theory anyway- if it wasn't the case, it'd just die the very first time you tried it.

and looking at the shots of the busted box, they really aren't small gear faces, either...

from reading the guy lost 1-3-5, so you'd assume it's 1. But maybee even the R35 has a week 3rd.

1st

the tranny obviously has a built in function where it doesn't try and select certain clutch groups if there is a drive irregularity detected

Suddenly the claims of porsche having trouble getting out of third with the gtr has merit. If u paid this much money for a car then u should be able to drive it like u stole it when u want to.They obviously made it with the weak gearbox. Nissan need to Fix the problem and look after u r clientel b 4 they send the GTR name into the toilet.

Supercar my ass!!!!!!I have become a fan of skylines in the last year or so but reading this is garbage.

As a supercar it should be able to take a licking and keep on ticking. I would be loading up with ammo and going to my dealership if they gave me this answer.

Hopefully they have the problem fixed b 4 u aussies get a hold of one. They should have disabled the ability of the LC from factory if it would void the warranty. its like getting the atomic bomb but being told that u have voided the warranty after u pressed the redbutton. BS to the max.

there american fat C#*ts remeber, 1750km car + 200kg driver + 80kg fuel+ 20kg of Maccas in the passenger seat + launch control trying to race to the hospital after realising a stroke is comming on...... super car or not ALL cars have a fault somewhere.

mabey the tranny needs to be alitle stronger but we will see what happens....

also the quote above that says in a nut shell that supercars should take a hiding and keep on going is completely shit..... yes supercars are expensive but none of them are reliable. They produce that much power that many things can and do go wrong. How many supercars do you see driving around in a month???? almost none, how many people see late model ferraries and porsches on the side of the road or on the back of a towy???? allot more than you see them driving i can assure you that....

a super car is meant to be thrashed but abuse will kill it.... and yes the launch control is the most damaging feature on this car and i rememebr reading 10 launch controlls can f**k it up completely, no one in a conventional gearbox and clutch can launch like these things do time and time agian, hell normal gearboxes can snap in minutes of heavy driving and there is nowhere near asmuch force as there is in the gtr.... still at the gtr's price range nissan should take this very serious and rectify any faults there may be.....

i remebr watching a documentary on the guy that is ferrari's official car tester in italy...... he went through a rari gear box in less than 60 seconds before the car wouldnt move forward at all, he had to take it back to the pits in reverse, the only difference with the rari and a gtr is people who buy the italian red machine are buying it in general for show of status, not for thrashing......

people buy the gtr for thrashing and performance, not really for status and looks

found the link i was talking about http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ux1KLSo-Mcc...feature=related

that's nothing to do with the gearbox

i think you'll find one of the a/c lines or gas canister let go

That'd suck. All I know is that this seems like it may be a manufacturing fault. What's the point of building a car with L/C if the tranny can't cope with it? Either don't include the launch control or strengthen the tranny.

It could simply be that the first batch of cars have a problem that has yet to be rectified.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As discussed in the previous post, the bushes in the 110 needed replacing. I took this opportunity to replace the castor bushes, the front lower control arm, lower the car and get the alignment dialled in with new tyres. I took it down to Alignment Motorsports on the GC to get this work done and also get more out of the Shockworks as I felt like I wasn't getting the full use out of them.  To cut a very long story short, it ended up being the case the passenger side castor arm wouldn't accept the brand new bush as the sleeve had worn badly enough to the point you could push the new bush in by hand and completely through. Trying a pair of TRD bushes didn't fix the issue either (I had originally gone with Hardrace bushes). We needed to urgently source another castor arm, and thankfully this was sourced and the guys at the shop worked on my car until 7pm on a Saturday to get everything done. The car rides a lot nicer now with the suspension dialled in properly. Lowered the car a little as well to suit the lower profile front tyres, and just bring the car down generally. Eternally thankful for the guys down at the shop to get the car sorted, we both pulled big favours from our contacts to get it done on the Saturday.  Also plugged in the new Stedi foglights into the S15, and even from a quick test in the garage I'm keen to see how they look out on the road. I had some concerns about the length of the LED body and whether it'd fit in the foglight housing but it's fine.  I've got a small window coming up next month where I'll likely get a little paint work done on the 110 to remove the rear wing, add a boot wing and roof wing, get the side skirt fixed up and colour match the little panel on the tail lights so that I can install some badges that I've kept in storage. I'm also tempted to put in a new pair of headlights on the 110.  Until then, here's some more pictures from Easter this year. 
    • I would put a fuel pressure gauge between the filter and the fuel rail, see if it's maintaining good fuel pressure at idle going up to the point when it stalls. Do you see any strange behavior in commanded fuel leading up to the point when it stalls? You might have to start going through the service manual and doing a long list of sensor tests if it's not the fuel system for whatever reason.
    • Hi,  Just joined the forum so I could share my "fix" of this problem. Might be of use to someone. Had the same hunting at idle issue on my V36 with VQ35HR engine after swapping the engine because the original one got overheated.  While changing the engine I made the mistake of cleaning the throttle bodies and tried all the tricks i could find to do a throttle relearn with no luck. Gave in and took it to a shop and they couldn't sort it. Then took it to my local Nissan dealership and they couldn't get it to idle properly. They said I'd need to replace the throttle bodies and the ecu probably costing more than the car is worth. So I had the idea of replacing the carbon I cleaned out with a thin layer of super glue and it's back to normal idle now. Bit rough but saved the car from the wreckers 🤣
    • After my last update, I went ahead with cleaning and restoring the entire fuel system. This included removing the tank and cleaning it with the Beyond Balistics solution, power washing it multiple times, drying it thoroughly, rinsing with IPA, drying again with heat gun and compressed air. Also, cleaning out the lines, fuel rail, and replacing the fuel pump with an OEM-style one. During the cleaning process, I replaced several hoses - including the breather hose on the fuel tank, which turned out to be the cause of the earlier fuel leak. This is what the old fuel filter looked like: Fuel tank before cleaning: Dirty Fuel Tank.mp4   Fuel tank after cleaning (some staining remains): Clean Fuel Tank.mp4 Both the OEM 270cc and new DeatschWerks 550cc injectors were cleaned professionally by a shop. Before reassembling everything, I tested the fuel flow by running the pump output into a container at the fuel filter location - flow looked good. I then fitted the new fuel filter and reassembled the rest of the system. Fuel Flow Test.mp4 Test 1 - 550cc injectors Ran the new fuel pump with its supplied diagonal strainer (different from OEM’s flat strainer) and my 550cc injectors using the same resized-injector map I had successfully used before. At first, it idled roughly and stalled when I applied throttle. Checked the spark plugs and found that they were fouled with carbon (likely from the earlier overly rich running when the injectors were clogged). After cleaning the plugs, the car started fine. However, it would only idle for 30–60 seconds before stalling, and while driving it would feel like a “fuel cut” after a few seconds - though it wouldn’t fully stall. Test 2 – Strainer swap Suspecting the diagonal strainer might not be reaching the tank bottom, I swapped it for the original flat strainer and filled the tank with ~45L of fuel. The issue persisted exactly the same. Test 3 – OEM injectors To eliminate tuning variables, I reinstalled the OEM 270cc injectors and reverted to the original map. Cleaned the spark plugs again just in-case. The stalling and “fuel cut” still remained.   At this stage, I suspect an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, caused during the cleaning process. This has led me to look into getting Frenchy’s fuel hanger and replacing the unit entirely. TL;DR: Cleaned and restored the fuel system (tank, lines, rail, pump). Tested 550cc injectors with the same resized-injector map as before, but the car stalls at idle and experiences what feels like “fuel cut” after a few seconds of driving. Swapped back to OEM injectors with original map to rule out tuning, but the issue persists. Now suspecting an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, possibly cause by the cleaning process.  
×
×
  • Create New...