Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

heloo.


i have been tying to install Nismo R34 GTR cluster in my GT,

most all working accept the speedometer end the central door lock.

engine Waring light : error speed sensor. is it possible to get pic of how it the cables are connected.


regards CB

  • 2 years later...
  • 8 months later...
  • 2 years later...
  • 6 months later...
  • 2 months later...

I have just completed this conversion and have updated the Excel document. I found an error on it and also added a few missing pin outs.GTR_Guage_Cluster_Conversion3.xls I can confirm everything works on my car, it is a GTT manual. The centre plug at the back of the cluster is different between GTT and GTR. The GTT is a brown 24 pin plug and does not plug into the white GTR 24 pin socket, I modified mine to fit using a hacksaw blade and needle file. I also swapped the lense over to the GTR cluster for the Slip and TCS off lights. 

  • Like 2
  • 1 month later...
  • 5 months later...
On 19/07/2013 at 8:06 AM, camperbob said:

heloo.


i have been tying to install Nismo R34 GTR cluster in my GT,

most all working accept the speedometer end the central door lock.

engine Waring light : error speed sensor. is it possible to get pic of how it the cables are connected.


regards CB

Hey i know its a looogshot but did you ever figure it out becuse i havet the same problem 

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 5 months later...
14 minutes ago, NZ-GTT said:

Nice work! How did you remove the pins from the connector blocks? I could not get mine out so I had to cut and solder wires.

a pin from the opposite side the wires hang out. through the inside hole.  i did this January 3, 2016 from my previous post date. the pictures are from then

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 months later...
  • 4 months later...

Oops good pick up! I just rechecked my pinouts and it should be 10 to 9 and 63 to 11. I've corrected the error and uploaded the file in this post as version 4.

GTR_Guage_Cluster_Conversion4.xls

On 7/27/2021 at 2:08 PM, NZ-GTT said:

Oops good pick up! I just rechecked my pinouts and it should be 10 to 9 and 63 to 11. I've corrected the error and uploaded the file in this post as version 4.

GTR_Guage_Cluster_Conversion4.xls 37.5 kB · 1 download

Thanks for the correction!

Another thing, non gtr pin 17 and pin 46 both move to non gtr pin 57.

Can you check if it is correct?

pin 17 is rear defog signal and pin 46 is charge w.l

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...