Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 435
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

mate of mine has scares all over his head to prove they are no fun.

back in the day they used to chain the cars and use those hook and turn-buckle style fasteners. He fell asleep at the wheel and drove up the arse of something, the racecar lurched of the trailer and onto the tow car.........ouch. Cant be to care-full, so overated straps and safety chains and re-checking the load is all fine by me. I guess at the end of the day if we are not doing what i have seen people do and use pieces of rope, then we stand a better chance of eliminating risk.

trailer crash is my worse nightmare

Pete I'm glad your happy!!!. I don't like selling to friends but thats been a great trailer in the years we owned it and can't see why with some care she won't do the same for you.

I must say Mel and I both love your R31. :D:P:ermm: Those wheels look so sexy on her. Is it a real SVD?. I had one as a company car (136 or 138) and a red one as well.

We stop all the time to check all is good. I also touch the wheel bearing caps to make sure they are not hot. It's a great way of catching a bearing problem.

Neil.

haha stagea gets 300klm/60l at best :D

pete do you have any trailer crash stories to share???11ty?

the reason i own a 4wd is because of the crashworks.... i mean raceworks trailer.... farken death trap!

130 + jacknife next to a B DOUBLE =scary

then got to the race track and scuck the car in a wall

good trip that one

DSC03680-thumb.jpg

Edited by fatz
K frame is mounted to the body - its a fully sprung component.

tieing down from fully sprung components means if the car's suspension compresses slightly when you hit a bump, the tie down goes slack and then the car's suspension rebounds and shock loads the restraint. A loosening restraint also allows the load to move. Tieing down from unsprung components which stay perfectly still in relation to the trailer keeps constant tension on the load you are trying to restrain. That has to be the best way to go.

the 200% figure was just plucked out of the air. But the idea is to allow a safety margin rather than just speccing them to 8 tenths of the weight they're trying to secure. for example, my old U2L IPRA race car weighed 851kg - your 8/10s rule of thumb whould mean all I need is a single strap rated to 680kg! I use two 800kg straps to tension the front and prevent the load moving rearwards, wheras with your system all i need is two 200kg straps. may as well use Telstra rope!

I don't know what kind of G force a loaded trailer/4WD combo can pull under an emergency braking situation - maybe .5 to .6G?? Passenger vehicles can do .8 to .9G if I recall the wheels/motor tests correctly, so .6G is 50% less braking force than that which is probably realistic enough. There goes 3/4 of your SWL (safe working load) just in braking alone - not much margin for safety left, is there? I'll continue to err on the side of caution. It may be uneccesary/overkill, but it just has to be safer than strap only rated to 8 tenths of the load its trying to hold.

And yes, if there is a crash and parts of the trailer or car that the restraints are connected to bend, I'm fine with that - its much better than the alternative of the restraint breaking and the load flying off to cause more damage. Even if it still didn't hold, it has to absorb more energy before something breaks.

The K frame is bolted to the body and so by tying that down you should be getting rid of a lot of body roll which is not good for towing long distance, or any distance really.

You read the rules wrong, for your car you will need 1x 680kg strap at the rear and 1x 425kg NOT 2x 200kg from the front, since this won't be enough to be safe assuming only one strap is taking the load. This is without factoring in side movement by the way, but nobody can factor in an accident when they are tying something down otherwise everyone would be tying their 1200kg race cars down with 22mm 100 grade chain and dogs from tow trucks to massive oblongs welded into huge thick plates on a trailer so nothing comes apart in this accident everyone is planning on having.

Of course this setup would weigh a good 2 tonne in trailer and bracing for the tie downs, maybe even more, not to mention getting tie down points rated to match welded to your car and I know that isn't happening.

And for Telstra rope or any rope for that matter, if you are not sure how much weight it can take safely the formula is this:

Diameter of the rope x 8 = SWL in kg :thumbsup:

yea mate real deal just with a proper engine ( rb30det)

ive owned number 32, 194 and 164

20 years on they still have tops steering feel ( getter than a gtr) and seats better than a gtr

mmmmmm r31 number 1!

more like 31 up ya bum... buttsex.gif

VTII Berlina V6 auto, towing GTR on cheapsh!t rental trailer, average about 18L to 100 on cruise control with AC on but only doing 100kph. I find the economy gets MUCH worse for that extra 10 kmh so i just sit below the limit the whole trip

The K frame is bolted to the body and so by tying that down you should be getting rid of a lot of body roll which is not good for towing long distance, or any distance really.

yep fully sprung, not unsprung as you said. so are you suggesting your 80% and 50% rule also allows for the extra strain of controlling body roll on top of just holding the weight of the load??? The only way to actually prevent suspension movement would be to pre-tension the straps so much that the suspension is on the bump stops!

quite contrary to your advice of never tieing down from the axles (which you even put in bold!), best practice for securing a vehicle on a trailer is around the tyre/wheel (an unsprung component that does not move in relation to the trailer!) like this cc8.gif and these http://www.uscargocontrol.com/wheelnetscartiedowns-c-47.html as used by car transportes and towies.

but however you tie it down, I think it would be a good idea to at least have straps rated to the weight of the car their holding, particularly if you are tieing to the fully sprung parts of the car that can and do move during transit which puts extra load on your tie downs.

anyway, my advice is go overboard in your tie down ratings rather than trying to use the minimum required. it certainly can't hurt.

TH31J_LRG.jpg

Ideally that's how i'd like to tie down my 600kg vehicle but mounting the d-rings to 2mm floor won't work as it's likely to rip it straight off the frame underneath or atleast try to.

Need to work out a way of mounting the d-rings to the floor, suggestions?

Edited by benm

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Ok guys thank you very much. GCG highflow it is then 🙂 
    • forgot to mention that when it does this it does not kill the engine, but I have not kept the pedal down long enough to let it, as I see no reason to beat up on it as its got to be something simple, small and dumb causing this.  And as soon as I let off pedal, the engine returns to its normal super smooth operation and rpms re-stabilize quickly, once below 4k. 
    • neither stumble or cut really seem to be an appropriate term....hard to explain its like a rev limiter but at 4k, but it violently shakes engine and entire vehicle as the rpms will not rise over 4k, even with slow acceleration. as soon as it hits 4k, it sounds like entire spark is lost entirely. plugs were 1.1 which I used as such, but later put in new plugs gapped down to .8 changed back after issue arose when I replaced the coils, still does it with either plug gap...damn and it was all running so good.
    • Oh how times have changed! I actually lean it out relative to my water/methanol injector duty cycle. The methanol adds a lot of fueling and you can then lean it out even more due to reduced knock. 
    • Yeah my thoughts are the same, a well thought out WMI setup, would be slightly ahead of just straight E85 and you're also chemically intercooling the charged air, dropping it even further. This is why you need to add so much more fuel as soon as you spray. I remember someone taking me through their set up before (Dennis, has a R33, lives around Cabramatta - no idea if he's still around on this forum). He would target AFR 10:1 on 98, then as WMI ramped on, AFR would lean back up to 11:1. Amazingly, he did this all through his PowerFC, a relay to cut power to his EBC solenoid if there was not enough line pressure on his WMI kit. And of course, if there wasn't any boost made above gate pressure, you wouldn't be accessing the load cells with heaps of timing for WMI. One downside to that rudimentary setup, once the WMI came on, the EBC would unleash the dragon, and of course all the timing. Tyres would fry lol.
×
×
  • Create New...