Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

If I install an RB25DE with carbs in an early Skyline with an upgraded ignition system can I completley eliminate the ECU and wiring harness? Because it seems like the only things the ECU really needs to control is timing (which will now be handled by the ignition system) and air/fuel ratio (now controlled by the carbs).

Thanks! :ermm:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/246188-rb25de-with-carbs/
Share on other sites

yes its a possibility

here in australia there was an early model Nissan Patrol ('88-90 i think) that came out with the RB30 but in carby form

if you could get hold of an intake manifold it could be possible to install a big holley 350 double pumper or something on it

thats crazy, interesting to hear what that would sound like..

... shit...

lol

feed it triple trumpeted webbers or even SU's and it would be allright though

Wouldnt be hard to custom make a manifold, would be better to start fresh, and make a short runner manifold feeding diectly to carbies instead of modifying the dirty 30 manifold to suit a 25

Edited by SKiT_R31

The question would be, WHY?

Even if transplanting, the engine is still from a "new" vehicle, and hence, when being engineered, needs to meet the Emmision levels of the engine.

Hence, going Carby, you will not meet these emissions, so I'd really have to ask WHY you want to do it?

If you get a whole loom, plus ECU, it really is only around 5 or so wires you need to modify to make it all fit. Much easier the customising manifolds.

Completely remove ECU and wiring harness...

but replace with custom inlet manifold and multiple carbies, you'd also need to use a different fuel pump as the EFI pump will have too much pressure for the carbies?

Potentially, yes it could be done, but question remains why you'd want to when you could get better tunability, resulting in more power and probably less fuel consumption, not to mention safe guards of things like knock sensors.

If you want induction noise, throttle response and better breathe-ability, you could make a custom inlet with individual throttles but still retain fuel injection.

induction noise, throttle response and better breathe-ability having 6 throttle bodies and no plenum if you were to use 3 side draught webbers, dellotos or so on.

Make a custom throttle with ITB, with individual air filters.

Same throttle response, same induction noise, no plenum, better tuneability, more reliable and consistent through varying weather patterns.

I still need to ask why you want to remove the ECU, considering, placing it in any car in NSW would make it illegal with ECU etc removed.

last time i checked, running an aftermarket ecu was also illegal.....

I would much prefer ITB's + MAP, but i can see why you would want carbies... and the induction/exhaust noise would be different, and you cant say for sure that you would get more power out of EFI, maybe economy and drivability and flexibility (weather, atmosphere etc) but it can be cheaper and a whole lot easier with carbies. Esp if you were to have some rediculous cam setup, aswell as other modifications, where you would need a damn good tuner to get good power (and lets face it, its hard to get a tuner so passionate to sqeeze every last kw out of a car by spending hours dicking with injector timing etc.)

Edited by SKiT_R31
The question would be, WHY?

Even if transplanting, the engine is still from a "new" vehicle, and hence, when being engineered, needs to meet the Emmision levels of the engine.

Hence, going Carby, you will not meet these emissions, so I'd really have to ask WHY you want to do it?

If you get a whole loom, plus ECU, it really is only around 5 or so wires you need to modify to make it all fit. Much easier the customising manifolds.

I still need to ask why you want to remove the ECU, considering, placing it in any car in NSW would make it illegal with ECU etc removed.

It says he's from Japan so our laws won't mean anything to him LOL

Edited by MintR33

when i run modifird production in speedway the rules said we had to use a 350 holley altho it could be converted to run methanol.

a few of the guys running vl's at the time used the nissan patrol manifold with a methanol holley and made good power out of them .

problem was finding the manifolds it was a problem back then and prob even worse now

cheers mid life crisis

If I install an RB25DE with carbs in an early Skyline with an upgraded ignition system can I completley eliminate the ECU and wiring harness? Because it seems like the only things the ECU really needs to control is timing (which will now be handled by the ignition system) and air/fuel ratio (now controlled by the carbs).

Thanks! :D

What's going to tell the "modified ignition system" to fire the spark?

The ECU does more than simply "control ignition timing".

If you are after the carby induction sound, you can run injectors in a weber-style manifold fitted with trumpets (have a look on www.efihardware.com). That way, you get the fuel efficiency of EFI with the induction "roar" of Webers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I had 3 counts over the last couple of weeks once where i got stranded at a jdm paint yard booking in some work. 2nd time was moving the car into the drive way for the inspection and the 3rd was during the inspection for the co2 leak test. Fix: 1st, car off for a hour and half disconnected battery 10mins 4th try car started 2nd, 5th try started 3rd, countless time starting disconnected battery dude was under the hood listening to the starting sequence fuel pump ect.   
    • This. As for your options - I suggest remote mounting the Nissan sensor further away on a length of steel tube. That tube to have a loop in it to handle vibration, etc etc. You will need to either put a tee and a bleed fitting near the sensor, or crack the fitting at the sensor to bleed it full of oil when you first set it up, otherwise you won't get the line filled. But this is a small problem. Just needs enough access to get it done.
    • The time is always correct. Only the date is wrong. It currently thinks it is January 19. Tomorrow it will say it is January 20. The date and time are ( should be ! ) retrieved from the GPS navigation system.
    • Buy yourself a set of easy outs. See if they will get a good bite in and unthread it.   Very very lucky the whole sender didn't let go while on the track and cost you a motor!
    • Well GTSBoy, prepare yourself further. I did a track day with 1/2 a day prep on Friday, inpromptu. The good news is that I got home, and didn't drive the car into a wall. Everything seemed mostly okay. The car was even a little faster than it was last time. I also got to get some good datalog data too. I also noticed a tiny bit of knock which was (luckily?) recorded. All I know is the knock sensors got recalibrated.... and are notorious for false knock. So I don't know if they are too sensitive, not sensitive enough... or some other third option. But I reduced timing anyway. It wasn't every pull through the session either. Think along the lines of -1 degree of timing for say, three instances while at the top of 4th in a 20 minute all-hot-lap session. Unfortunately at the end of session 2... I noticed a little oil. I borrowed some jack stands and a jack and took a look under there, but as is often the case, messing around with it kinda half cleaned it up, it was not conclusive where it was coming from. I decided to give it another go and see how it was. The amount of oil was maybe one/two small drops. I did another 20 minute session and car went well, and I was just starting to get into it and not be terrified of driving on track. I pulled over and checked in the pits and saw this: This is where I called it, packed up and went home as I live ~20 min from the track with a VERY VERY CLOSE EYE on Oil Pressure on the way home. The volume wasn't much but you never know. I checked it today when I had my own space/tools/time to find out what was going on, wanted to clean it up, run the car and see if any of the fittings from around the oil filter were causing it. I have like.. 5 fittings there, so I suspected one was (hopefully?) the culprit. It became immediately apparent as soon as I looked around more closely. 795d266d-a034-4b8c-89c9-d83860f5d00a.mp4       This is the R34 GTT oil sender connected via an adapter to an oil cooler block I have installed which runs AN lines to my cooler (and back). There's also an oil temp sensor on top.  Just after that video, I attempted to unthread the sensor to see if it's loose/worn and it disintegrated in my hand. So yes. I am glad I noticed that oil because it would appear that complete and utter catastrophic engine failure was about 1 second of engine runtime away. I did try to drill the fitting out, and only succeeded in drilling the middle hole much larger and now there's a... smooth hole in there with what looks like a damn sleeve still incredibly tight in there. Not really sure how to proceed from here. My options: 1) Find someone who can remove the stuck fitting, and use a steel adapter so it won't fatigue? (Female BSPT for the R34 sender to 1/8NPT male - HARD to find). IF it isn't possible to remove - Buy a new block ($320) and have someone tap a new 1/8NPT in the top of it ($????) and hope the steel adapter works better. 2) Buy a new block and give up on the OEM pressure sender for the dash entirely, and use the supplied 1/8 NPT for the oil temp sender. Having the oil pressure read 0 in the dash with the warning lamp will give me a lot of anxiety driving around. I do have the actual GM sensor/sender working, but it needs OBD2 as a gauge. If I'm datalogging I don't actually have a readout of what the gauge is currently displaying. 3) Other? Find a new location for the OEM sender? Though I don't know of anywhere that will work. I also don't know if a steel adapter is actually functionally smart here. It's clearly leveraged itself through vibration of the motor and snapped in half. This doesn't seem like a setup a smart person would replicate given the weight of the OEM sender. Still pretty happy being lucky for once and seeing this at the absolute last moment before bye bye motor in a big way, even if an adapter is apparently 6 weeks+ delivery and I have no way to free the current stuck/potentially destroyed threads in the current oil block.
×
×
  • Create New...