Jump to content
SAU Community

Gt35r Vs Garrett T04z - Discussion (just Post In This Thread To Create A Database)


Recommended Posts

i was comparing simons 625hp not my own setup nick.

cerbera thats something i expected from you on a forum, just your style lol

borg warners are where its at :P

come on its a matter of personal preference i think, everyone has there own ideas of lag/power/fast.

11m59gn.jpg

beii5j.jpg

pretty much the same engine/turbo but one has 6-boost twin scroll and one has china manifold and a dodgy gate

shows what a well set up manifold/gate/boost controller combo can do...

Would it be possible to overlay a stock curve for those following at home?

post-11223-1261636788_thumb.jpg

Ah ic ic - makes more sense now :P

Would be interesting to see the GT35 on a good setup i think, one thing that's missing from the comparo's haha ;)

Here is a graph of my GT35 with .82 rear on a decent manifold setup

also i plotted it on brockas graph to compare, its the black line.

post-11223-1261636788_thumb.jpg

diff ratios dont seem to be the same and isnt yours a RB30 therefore totally useless comparison?!?

lol ye exactly - twice in as many days... stand back george :)

Thanks sky30 - but kinda... not really relevant unfortunately :(

Didnt realise that its a RB26, for some reason i thought brockas was a RB30det, That would explain why it seems so laggy to me. Oh well interesting comparison between rb30 and rb26.

Its a r32 gtr diff, 4.11 ratio, what are the ratios in the other graphs?

Car should be running in a week or so. And i'll head to the plex again see if it can go decently into the tens on street tyres. To4z has the top end to get decently into the mid 130mph's. With the small things its had done to it this time round 650rwhp should be enough for mid tens on street tyres.

I'd love to see a GT4088R compared with these things :D

lol give my bank balance time to recover after this change in setup first!!

I've now taken 2 people for a spin in my car. They both saw the graphs before going for a drive, and said the exact same thing. "It doesn't feel as laggy as it looks on the dyno plot".

Would love to have it snapping on boost hard, but I don't think my gearbox would like that...

Just looking at Pauls Graph compared to mine as a t04z to to4z comparison seems to be quite a bit of difference in response. They are both roughly based on speed vs hp and at say at 130kms pauls is making 220hp ish and mine is making almost 400hp at the same speed. Just an interesting comparison as mine didn't really feel laggy at all and should be better with the new setup of bigger valves and bits and pieces. As a comparison mine was running 27psi and i think pauls is 25psi so pretty close.

ftzcck.jpg29kvupj.jpg

Edited by R32-GTS

I think you can put it down to the boost control.

You can see in your graph the boost comes on hard where as Brockas is a bit lazier. A good boost controller makes all the difference.

Car should be running in a week or so. And i'll head to the plex again see if it can go decently into the tens on street tyres. To4z has the top end to get decently into the mid 130mph's. With the small things its had done to it this time round 650rwhp should be enough for mid tens on street tyres.

LOL

no chance you will have it running in a week or so!!!

Indeed arguable. Effiecent range on the GT35 is probably 28 - 30psi and 35 + on t04z.

Brockas like most probably not keen to push to those levels.

All your graph comparo proves is that brockas china manifold / setup is crap compared to 6boost and your setup.

GT35 on your setup would have rocked.

LOL coming from the guy that never raced his 26 !!! Simon N has times you got wannabe ......

Final word

IN PERTH GT35 smashs the t04z on RB26. Best single t04z time is like 10.8 on a fully built motor ??

There is more then one GT35 RB26's quicker then that IN PERTH.

RockoGTR's 10.4 on Nexan Radials is a GT35 and China manifold. We are going to put it on E85 and MT Drag radials and try again.

I think you can put it down to the boost control.

You can see in your graph the boost comes on hard where as Brockas is a bit lazier. A good boost controller makes all the difference.

I now have one of the best boost controllers on the market, the Blitz Dual SBC Spec R.

Unfortunately, it's my wastegate which is letting me down.

Simon, we overlayed yours versus mine and yours destroys my setup everywhere. It's on earlier due to the head porting, but yours snaps on boost so much harder. I think once I sort this wastegate issue it will change the midrange dramatically and also carry a few more HP to the top.

For now though, I'm going to see how long this $300 2nd hand box lasts... the fact that it lasted the dyno run means it's been good value so far...

Natto it will be interesting for me to see if your car can repeat the 627. That is a 4 year old dyno graph your clinging on to. Dyno's get worn, software updates and re-calibrated over that time.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
    • If they can dyno them, get them dyno'd, make sure they're not leaking, and if they look okay on the dyno and are performing relatively well, put them in the car.   If they're leaking oil etc, and you feel so inclined, open them up yourself and see what you can do to fix it. The main thing you're trying to do is replace the parts that perish, like seals. You're not attempting to change the valving. You might even be able to find somewhere that has the Tein parts/rebuild kit if you dig hard.
    • Can you also make sure the invoices on the box (And none exist in the boxes) are below our import duty limits... I jest, there's nothing I need to actually purchase and order in. (Unless you can find me a rear diff carrier, brand new, for stupidly cheap, that is for a Toyota Landcruiser, HZJ105R GXL, 2000 year model...)  
×
×
  • Create New...