Jump to content
SAU Community

Gt35r Vs Garrett T04z - Discussion (just Post In This Thread To Create A Database)


Recommended Posts

Brockas mine will be being re-tuned in the next week or two aswell so should have another 26/to4z to compare too.

using a turbosmart 48mm and avcr.. so will be interesting to see the boost curve aswell, what wastegate are you running?

Good to see a back to back comparison there. Even though the setup could be improved, presumably the improvements would effect both dyno plots. the results are pretty much what I expected - 500-600rpm more lag, 70-100 more hp in the top end.

We are pulling the t04z off my car in the next few weeks and we're going to put on one of the new GT3788R's. Should be very interesting to see what it can do. I will try to get back to back graphs.

The graph of 1bxx056 looks pretty much identicle to mine. Would be good to see that overlayed against a really properly setup 35r on good manifolds etc.

one of the new GT3788R's. Should be very interesting to see what it can do. I will try to get back to back graphs.

That would be tops !!

Are the GT37 available in t3 rear housing ?

GT35 FTW !

Just got mine done, Injectors now all in and tuned up.

Was tuned by Andy at hyperdrive but run up at allstar due to some wheel spin fun.

Now 561 rwhp up from 450rwhp !!

20-21 psi boost.

Still a stock jap import RB26(including stock cams n cams gears) with just bolt on gt35 turbo and injectors.

RedbackDyno560.jpg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=62ze0NXMWBU

This car has gone well over 600rwhp on an RB25 with GT35 and E85, Ultra reliable engine into its 4th season racing, we run it at 600rwhp as its a very basic RB25.

RB34 coming this season with a Housing change on the GT35.

Here's a copy of the graph.

With a built motor i'd be enjoying this all day every day :rofl:

Mmm is that more then Cerbera's Built 26 with T04z ?????

Redback24psi.jpg

Edited by Butters
Here's a copy of the graph.

With a built motor i'd be enjoying this all day every day :)

Mmm is that more then Cerbera's Built 26 with T04z ?????

Redback24psi.jpg

SMD simmo!!!

but yes that shit is impressive, why did you abort run?!? PING PING PING PING :P

We are pulling the t04z off my car in the next few weeks and we're going to put on one of the new GT3788R's. Should be very interesting to see what it can do. I will try to get back to back graphs.

Thats a very interesting change to make - what motivated that, and what are you hoping from it vs the T04Z? Are they both T3 flanged? I've often wondered about the GT3788Rs but not been too sure on what to expect... a comparison I've always been very curious about is the GT4088R and the T04Z.

Thats a very interesting change to make - what motivated that, and what are you hoping from it vs the T04Z? Are they both T3 flanged? I've often wondered about the GT3788Rs but not been too sure on what to expect... a comparison I've always been very curious about is the GT4088R and the T04Z.

my t04z is a split pulse t4 flange - same as the GT3788. The 4088R is a bigger turbo than the T04Z (compressor and turbine) so it will flow more HP, with a tiny bit more lag.

Main reason for doing the swap is simply that the Z is too doughy out of medium tight corners around the track. IE: turns 3/4 @ QR I take at about 80km/hr. 2nd gear == massive tailslide on exit, whilst 3rd gear == LAG all the way out of the corner. Hopefully the new turbo is not only slightly more responsive, but a lot more linear in power delivery. I make 1 bar at 4100rpm with the Z and 24psi at 4500. Thats not too laggy, but as soon as you go below 4000 rpm there is absolutely nothing there. I wouldnt care too much if the 3788 only makes 1 bar at 4000rpm as long as 3800/3900 still had SOMETHING available unlike the Z which comes on like a lightswitch once you get over 4.

The only unfortuante thing is that I wont be able to directly compare how the 2 turbo's would have worked on the track as I'm making some other significant changes to the car at the same time. So wont be able to say if the 3788 is soley responsible for better lap times, but hopefully combined with everything else we are doing it makes a big difference.

Still probably a couple of weeks away from doing the swap - will see how we go.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • You don’t need to use full throttle all the time to break these blocks, 500kw at the wheels in more then enough to break them even with an occasional squirt. Hell I’ve seen them break under 400kw
    • A work around is to install the R35 card style AFM/MAF on the cold side of the intercooler piping and the BOV on the hot side piping. Works well, also you can combat the revs dropping by adding a bit more ignition timing on the idle ignition timing table to slow the rate of RPM drop.
    • Understood. If you dont have a ridiculous limit,  Tune, T's and P's are in check, and arent bashing it all the time and doing the due deligence for maintenance(inc oil analysis) then its pretty safe. 100% agree, let your right food control it to some extent.
    • So these external kits with the machined block for remote solenoid mount will only work on a NEO head and RB30 or RB26 bottom end   For an R33 head on a 26 bottom end the remote vct kit is to resolve RB26 manifold adaptor plates etc  IF you try to use the remote VCT on an RB30 or RB26 bottom end with an R33 head then  you can starve the cam journal??? I have one of these kits from bits I had years ago before plans changed  I don't understand how that tracks with this video   https://youtu.be/RuPiI22Mplk?feature=shared   This looks like I can run the v termite vct kit to feed the VCT on an R33 head on an RB26 bottom end?!?!?   Lol.... don't v have these problems on RB20s
    • Yeah i know that MAF is no no for this type of BoV. The engine has no BoV and "hose/pipes" ..it was all deleted (or probably it was not even on the engine when it was bought  ) It does that "sutututu" noise which i kinda do not want(atmospheric is better IMO...but standalone ECU)  What are the cons of running without blow off on stock RB25DET NEO. It running 5-7 PSI max (it has boost controller)   EDIT: and can Nistune be "tuned" to know there is no BoV to i dont know "know" and be better for a car? I read so many info about no BoV. One guy saying it is bad and hurting the turbo/engine/car and other that it does not...  
×
×
  • Create New...