Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Imagine a 5 speed tiptronic in a c34. That to me would make the series 2 complete. Anyone thought about/looked into the possibility?

M35 / 350 z spares must be coming online?

Maybe Im :huh: but seems like it is a really worthwhile mod. Wadda u think?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/246774-5-speed-tiptronic-in-c34-stag/
Share on other sites

G`day this has all ready been talked about on 30 march trans upgrade. Why few think it`s the go many don`t seem to care or are not interested.I have been talking to few shop`s about this & it wll work but at WHAT COST ???,cheer`s chuckie

Have you seen the physical size of the 5 speed? Apart from the fact that it is made to bolt up to a V6, the bloody thing is MASSIVE compared to the C34 box. Not having closely examined the possibilty myself, I cant say for certain, but I can imagine that the trans tunnel would need a fair bit of modifications, shifter position and connection would need to be looked at, you would need to look closely at the departure angles for the front and rear driveshafts, position (and size) of the transfer case, attessa ecu compatibility, the list goes on and on.

this is why there isn't much interest in it.

Have you seen the physical size of the 5 speed? Apart from the fact that it is made to bolt up to a V6, the bloody thing is MASSIVE compared to the C34 box. Not having closely examined the possibilty myself, I cant say for certain, but I can imagine that the trans tunnel would need a fair bit of modifications, shifter position and connection would need to be looked at, you would need to look closely at the departure angles for the front and rear driveshafts, position (and size) of the transfer case, attessa ecu compatibility, the list goes on and on.

this is why there isn't much interest in it.

Thanks for that. Explains a lot

gtr manual conversion = 6 speed :)

and it would be cheaper,, not shure if a gtr box would bolt on to the rb25... anyone?

No if i wanted manual i would own one but i want auto that`s why i have auto :D play with clutch every day :down::sick: 5 speed tip would be sweet ,if you want manual con speak to BRAD :merli::):3some: ,thank`s jippa,we can all come over do on week :woot: end :yes: i cookthe BBQ :ninja: if you like ,cheer`s dude .

would be keen as but i have warranty on the car that covers the auto box.. maybe when that runs out in 4 years and i still have the stag.. would love a 6 speed though . mmmmmmm 6 speed :)

dont get me wrong,i still like the auto for cruiseability

As someone that's owned both (owned a s2 stagea with 4sp tiptronic for 2 years and now own a M35 with 5sp), I think it would be wise to actually drive a M35 before assuming that the 5sp auto would be automatically better than the 4sp.

Before I bought my M35 I thought the 5speed auto would be one of the killer features. But as it turns out its actually starting to frustrate me a little. I'm pretty sure my gearbox is badly in need of a service, so dont take my experience too seriously, however I would be interested in what other M35 owners have to say.

Firstly, my previous stagea did have a shift kit (MV automatics in SA) installed so that does shift the balance in its favour already. That 4speed with the shift kit was the best auto I have ever driven. Gear shifts were near-instant and quite snappy. Just a small movement of my right foot and it would kick down very quickly - which was great for changing lanes to get out from behind slow drivers (not that I do this often).

However, my M35 is almost the opposite. Its ok once it actually starts moving, but if I jam my foot to the floor from when the car is stopped, it takes at least 2 seconds to even start moving - its as if it actually jumps into neutral when not moving and then has to find 1st gear again. Then 1st gear is actually very short so it runs out of puff very quickly, before hitting 2nd and I find 2nd is where it really starts to move. The later gears seem ok. The gear changes are completely different to the 4speed - I wonder if this is due to the car being drive-by-wire?? allowing it to blip the throttle much more effectively during gear changes?

Overall the M35 drives very nice but occasionally I find myself wishing for my old 4speed auto back. Due to the slower gear changes, the extra gear means even more time spent changing gears. This is something I hadn't thought of before. The kickdown is also very slow. If I plant my foot in order to overtake, its a good 2+ seconds before it actually changes gear, and even then it seems to be so loaded up at this point (since it hits full boost at the same time) that it really doesn't go all that quick, certainly not as quick as its capable of.

When cruising at constant speed, it feels like the gearbox disconnects or something - maybe someone could help me understand this? As soon as I touch the throttle again, ie. to just ease the speed up a little if it starts slowing down, its like the gearbox has to re-engage which you can feel through the whole car. I dont know if any of this relates to the drive-by-wire or just the transmission...but its little things like these that make me a bit disappointed with the 5speed auto.

Dont get me wrong, the car is still nice to drive - and the above is just little things I've picked up - when compared to my old 4speed auto stagea.

So yeah whilst it is a nice concept to have 1 more gear in your stagea, I think in practice it may be otherwise since the two gearboxes are VERY different (at least to drive).

I welcome any further feedback on this from other M35 owners. Hopefully my experience is due to a fault somewhere along the line since I would like to improve the M35 gearbox behaviour if possible.

i find the gearbox sluggish too, mostly on kick-backs at low speed. ie, cruising in traffic at aroun 15km/h ill put my foot to the floor as i pull into the lane next to me, but it takes SO f**kING LONG to kick-down that the car i almost cut off has had to brake so they dont hit me. then it find the gear it was after and powers off. in traffic now i use the tiptronic and keep it in 1st so i can perform said manouvers safely.

maybe due to the higher power and torque over the RB25 that it needs to be more gentle with shifting so nothing down the driveline is broken or prematurely wears out?? thats my theory anyway lol

while the car is moving, i rekon the gearbox is perfect - on my car anyway - except for a problem i put it in for last week.

i love my manual c34, i much rather it than an auto...

well i like my AUTO THAT`S WHY I BROUGHT ONE :) ,if i had wanted manual i would have found one ,great work Alex.if you don`t have any thing good to add to this then PLEASE POST in right thread thank you .cheer`s chuckie.

well i like my AUTO THAT`S WHY I BROUGHT ONE :) ,if i had wanted manual i would have found one ,great work Alex.if you don`t have any thing good to add to this then PLEASE POST in right thread thank you .cheer`s chuckie.

fk off idiot i was just posting my opinion, go stitch up a dash mat or something

While it`s nice to see you post some good comment would be helpful :thumbsup: ,speaking to few lad`s tiptronic may not like rb30set up :D ,but will keep ASKING question`s see what can be done .cheer`s chuckie.

As someone that's owned both (owned a s2 stagea with 4sp tiptronic for 2 years and now own a M35 with 5sp), I think it would be wise to actually drive a M35 before assuming that the 5sp auto would be automatically better than the 4sp.

Before I bought my M35 I thought the 5speed auto would be one of the killer features. But as it turns out its actually starting to frustrate me a little. I'm pretty sure my gearbox is badly in need of a service, so dont take my experience too seriously, however I would be interested in what other M35 owners have to say.

Firstly, my previous stagea did have a shift kit (MV automatics in SA) installed so that does shift the balance in its favour already. That 4speed with the shift kit was the best auto I have ever driven. Gear shifts were near-instant and quite snappy. Just a small movement of my right foot and it would kick down very quickly - which was great for changing lanes to get out from behind slow drivers (not that I do this often).

However, my M35 is almost the opposite. Its ok once it actually starts moving, but if I jam my foot to the floor from when the car is stopped, it takes at least 2 seconds to even start moving - its as if it actually jumps into neutral when not moving and then has to find 1st gear again. Then 1st gear is actually very short so it runs out of puff very quickly, before hitting 2nd and I find 2nd is where it really starts to move. The later gears seem ok. The gear changes are completely different to the 4speed - I wonder if this is due to the car being drive-by-wire?? allowing it to blip the throttle much more effectively during gear changes?

Overall the M35 drives very nice but occasionally I find myself wishing for my old 4speed auto back. Due to the slower gear changes, the extra gear means even more time spent changing gears. This is something I hadn't thought of before. The kickdown is also very slow. If I plant my foot in order to overtake, its a good 2+ seconds before it actually changes gear, and even then it seems to be so loaded up at this point (since it hits full boost at the same time) that it really doesn't go all that quick, certainly not as quick as its capable of.

When cruising at constant speed, it feels like the gearbox disconnects or something - maybe someone could help me understand this? As soon as I touch the throttle again, ie. to just ease the speed up a little if it starts slowing down, its like the gearbox has to re-engage which you can feel through the whole car. I dont know if any of this relates to the drive-by-wire or just the transmission...but its little things like these that make me a bit disappointed with the 5speed auto.

Dont get me wrong, the car is still nice to drive - and the above is just little things I've picked up - when compared to my old 4speed auto stagea.

So yeah whilst it is a nice concept to have 1 more gear in your stagea, I think in practice it may be otherwise since the two gearboxes are VERY different (at least to drive).

I welcome any further feedback on this from other M35 owners. Hopefully my experience is due to a fault somewhere along the line since I would like to improve the M35 gearbox behaviour if possible.

Yep.

If you mash the accelerator the computer will take a second (or 2) to Think. Select. Engage. It is due to the drive-by-wire.

The key is to squeeze the accelerator... and plan sightly in advance where you want to go and who you want to pass.

Try taking ~2 seconds from "no foot" to "foot to the floor". I think you will find it is more responsive that way (odd, I know).

If I use that technique, I get some pretty good gear changes.

Yes it seems that 1st gear was only there to build torque for 2nd gear, but I would disagree that it is "breathless".

Have you opened up your airbox? Got a decent filter? Installed a 3" exhaust?

MV Automatics do not do a shift kit for the M35 :P .... not yet anyway.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Ha, well, it's been.... a bit of a journey. Things have taken much longer than I'd hoped. I'll probably put up a thread at some stage. Hopefully soon. The car's not done any kms since my update in June though, put it that way.
    • Here's the chart for fuel pressure vs. current draw, assuming your base fuel pressure is 3 bar and you run like 0.5bar boost on WOT, you should only momentarily hit 9amps here and there. (Ignore my prev post, I cannot read a chart these days it seems)
    • Those comp test results are not hideous. Whether they are accurate or not (ie, when that comp tester says 140 psi, is the real pressure120, 140 or 160?) is unknown to us. The state of the battery used to crank it over is unknown, etc etc. Many people around here would say that the absolute values and the spread are perfectly fine to just add boost and keep going. I personally would be happier with a narrower spread than that, but even the diff between 125 and 145 is not terrible. That one cylinder at 125 though, has probably copped some damage relative to the others. You should inspect the valves seeing as you've got it open. Do you know how to measure installed ring gaps? That, and an inspection of the rings themselves, is how you will determine whether they need to be replaced. If you're not good to do these things, take the block and the pistons and rings to a shop that is, and ask them for the go/no-go on them. Do the bores need a hone at all? If so, you might well be justified in getting some different pistons in order to get away from the ring supply problem. Whether you're happy to spend a lot more money right now, on more gear, rather than less money, but an amount that looks stupid given that you will only get a handful of rings in exchange for that money, is for you to decide.
    • also possibly backed up to my filler and shat down it! 🤣
    • Ok so i would love some advice here please, i purchased an R33 a few months back and its had a few mods done to the engine, its an RB25det running a Master ECU, 1200cc injectors, bigger turbo, oil cooler, oil filter relocation kit, Spool H-beam rods, acl/ross pistons. When i removed the motor from the vehicle (as its getting a respray) i thought i would compression test it and these are the following results. Cylinder 1-145psi, Cylinder 2-143psi, Cylinder 3-125psi, Cylinder 4-145psi, Cylinder 5-140psi, Cylinder 6-135psi this test was done with the motor on the ground and powering up the starter motor. I dropped the sump and found broken oil squirters on cylinder 3,5 and 6. I was told my rings are probably worn so i stripped the motor completely to get a new set of rings for it. The trouble is no one has these rings anywhere and they have to be custom made by Ross over in the states and will cost about $600+$200 delivery. My question is how can i tell if my rings are at fault and if they are still ok and is this price ok for a set of rings?
×
×
  • Create New...