Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey Baron how much longer are the Ikeya LCA's relative to stock?

The Nismo ones are only 5mm each side .from memory

the ikeya ones are adjustable at the inner mounts. a fair bit there too. and they have the roll centre correction adjustment too. and they come with castor rods which are the beefiest thing you've ever seen. like double or tripple the thickness of standard and instead of the stupid 2 stud fixing they have a rose joint where they mount to the LCA and mount in the middle of the LCA with a huge bolt running through. very nice.

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

The problem with the castor/camber trade off is as you wind more +ve castor in you lose you -ve camber. So no free lunch.

besactly! that was what I was saying (albeit poorly!).

what I meant was you get to that point where you need the camber so just have to live without the castor.

hmm, maybe I will have to buy the nismo gear and flog all the bits I don't want.

besactly! that was what I was saying (albeit poorly!).

what I meant was you get to that point where you need the camber so just have to live without the castor.

hmm, maybe I will have to buy the nismo gear and flog all the bits I don't want.

This is turning out to be a useful bit of chit chat.

The set up I have is NOLTEC Upper arm and CUCSO caster rods. Stock everything else. Tru-Track down here in Melbourne has set it up with 3.5 neg camber and 6 degrees of caster, and have had no issues with the components and it's nice on the 265/35/18 RE55's that I use. (Phillip Island is really tough on front right tyres).

It's the most caster I can fit without hitting the front of the guard liner, so can't imagine you could get any more without some modifications to the bumper etc.

Be interested in the camber/castor geometry any of you guys that run in club sprints use.

Cheers

Andrew

i have the same as you andrew. cusco castor rods and noltec uppers. and about the same geometry as well, just a tough less neg camber and a touch more castor.

but I'll be going to the ikeya lowers when the car is up and running again. and may change the uppers. not sure yet, i'll see how I go.

besactly! that was what I was saying (albeit poorly!).

what I meant was you get to that point where you need the camber so just have to live without the castor.

exactly. cars typically only use about 17degrees of lock on a track, so the amount of camber gain from castor is pretty limited. Its almost always worth trading off castor for static camber if that's the choice you're faced with.

pics and approx price on the ikeya lower arms richard? pretty sure price will rule them out for me.

We are going to run the noltec uppers on the new car, but as well as the fact they will flog out the bushes over time due to caster is that it is very difficult to address the front roll centre without major mods (the rear is easy by comparison).

so....we will probably follow Brad's lead and go custom lower arms with better roll centre adjustment after the first few runs. the design of the lower arm with the 2 ball joints means not much height out of the inner side.

pics and approx price on the ikeya lower arms richard? pretty sure price will rule them out for me.

We are going to run the noltec uppers on the new car, but as well as the fact they will flog out the bushes over time due to caster is that it is very difficult to address the front roll centre without major mods (the rear is easy by comparison).

so....we will probably follow Brad's lead and go custom lower arms with better roll centre adjustment after the first few runs. the design of the lower arm with the 2 ball joints means not much height out of the inner side.

My old GTR had Noltec uppers and like you say it flogged the bushes out every 8 meetings or so. I even tried rotating the bushes but it didnt help.

Hence you have found my reasoning for doing the new front end Duncan.

You can do away with the Original lower arm

Original upright and upper arm

Ive fabricated chromolly lower wishbone arms with a single outer balljoint and two inner rose joints mounted underneath the chassis rails.

The upper arms are almost identical to the lowers and use the original bearning pivot ontop of the hub and mount to a custom section with rose joints on the inside.

Both arms are adjustable and I can run up to 15 inch wide rim on the front without any fouling problems (with modified arches)

Bump steer is almost non existant with the arms done this way and it actually does away with the castor rod all together.

Roll center changes become easy as well. you do a similar thing to what you guys have in the rear with properly positioned holes you can change to. Im yet to experiment with the angles of the arms but that will have to wait till its on the track I guess.

Edited by Risking

ahh good, so you found space for 2 inner lower mounts? Thats a better setup and the only way I can see to get rid of the caster rods.

the benefit of the noltec upper arms is while the bushes might flog out pretty quickly, they are at least a common and cheap size to replace. We have to run bushes on the caster rods too and they flog out just as badly. Turns out that's why I broke 2 caster rods (going over 150klm/h both times, one at eastern creek and one at targa). Anything that replaces these with properly designed spherical setup is a good idea for a track only car.

having said all of this, its all overkill for your average road/track car. in that case stick with the noltec or even better UAS upper arms they are great for the job. the geometry redesigns that brad has been doing are really only for very serious track only cars.

Our front end set-up was

Noltec uppers

Tein casters

HKS shocks and springs

Whiteline adjustable bar

Luke said we got the front end almost spot on with our settings/geometry but he also said the rear end was squirmy under brakes and a bit soft and rolly mid corner. Under power it was good though and we realised we still had the rear coilovers set-up for drag racing...lol...no wonder it got the power down well. Ahh well... life's a lesson.

We have some Quantum coilover's from the UK for the car now so they should have the rear end under better control.

Im lovin' this corner stuff...so much to get your teeth into.

Edited by DiRTgarage
ahh good, so you found space for 2 inner lower mounts? Thats a better setup and the only way I can see to get rid of the caster rods.

the benefit of the noltec upper arms is while the bushes might flog out pretty quickly, they are at least a common and cheap size to replace. We have to run bushes on the caster rods too and they flog out just as badly. Turns out that's why I broke 2 caster rods (going over 150klm/h both times, one at eastern creek and one at targa). Anything that replaces these with properly designed spherical setup is a good idea for a track only car.

having said all of this, its all overkill for your average road/track car. in that case stick with the noltec or even better UAS upper arms they are great for the job. the geometry redesigns that brad has been doing are really only for very serious track only cars.

Yeah I have managed to mount two rose joints for the inner mountings. You'll have to have a look at mine (kinda keeping actual geometry close atm but can talk you through it), considerable time has gone into it, making sure the mountings are keeping geometry roughly how it was on paper. The biggest thing we had to over come was making the cage structural enough to support the strut top which is using the factory top mount and make it able to reinforce the chassis rail for the lower arm as well as the custom section for the upper wishbone. It really is re-inventing the entire cars geometry but its for the better.

I make have found a set of Penske front uprights with spindles and drive pins so could be re-doing the whole thing again yet.

I have actually settled on a set of "cheaper" coilovers for the new car too. Again on paper they should be decently matched with the right springs. The ohlins in the the old car are now staying in the car. Jay bought all the suspension that was in it so all the development that went into it will now be staying with the car, which im glad to see happen. With some luck the new geometry will be a massive step forward and allow me to use slightly more affordable dampners to get the same results.

I was speaking with Gary on Friday about sway bar and spring options so we now have a few things in the pipe line come time to go testing. Come time to get serious about your suspension Duncan I think alot of what we have learnt from doing mine will can be transfered directly to your car. I have Jig's for all the components and mounting points now.

With front lower control arms would it be best going Ikeya Formula or Nismo. Any one know the difference between nismo and stock? Car is mainly street driven, but looking at doing track work early next year.

Already got the Cusco negative upper arms and Caster arms. Running -3.3degrees camber and +5.5 caster.

With front lower control arms would it be best going Ikeya Formula or Nismo. Any one know the difference between nismo and stock? Car is mainly street driven, but looking at doing track work early next year.

Already got the Cusco negative upper arms and Caster arms. Running -3.3degrees camber and +5.5 caster.

There is no doubt that the Ikeya arms are superior to everything else on the market. But they are still not a solution to roll center issues and they are very costly.

If your only just starting up circuit work seriously spend your money else where unless you have a need to replace the lower arms

For the cost of the lower arms you could get better brake pads/fluid all round and pay for a track day to practice. Money much better spent and you'll be faster for it.

Even if you have good brakes there are more important things to buy firstly.

  • 4 weeks later...
With front lower control arms would it be best going Ikeya Formula or Nismo. Any one know the difference between nismo and stock? Car is mainly street driven, but looking at doing track work early next year.

Already got the Cusco negative upper arms and Caster arms. Running -3.3degrees camber and +5.5 caster.

The Nismo LCA is essentially a stock LCA however the outer hole in the arm is located an extra few mm's to the outside. Almost all of the Nismo suspension arms, rods brackets etc are based on stock parts or are very similar to them.

If anyone wants the roll centre adjusters I have the drawings for them both front & rear. Easy to make, a pain in the backside to install - particularly at the rear.

  • 2 weeks later...

I have given up on hoping to buy something half decent to put in the front of my R32R. So I made my own. When I say I made it, well I sketched it before giving to the draftie, who gave it to the fitter who gave it to the boilermaker/welder, who gave it back to the fitter who gave it to me to fit. Anyway it appears to work & confer heroic amounts of -ve camber on the front. :P

I used the Whiteline bush kit. The ends are matched to the same length & id as the stock components, the trail is 22(ish)mms from memory & the length I settled on was 170mm. Bolted up nicely.

post-5134-1233551393_thumb.jpg

post-5134-1233551432_thumb.jpg

We are running D-Project ones in our R32 Drifter. They are based on the Midori Seibi design with bearings w/ lockable turnbuckle making them on-car adjustable. R33 ones are in the development phase. Bearings are stock shelf items and will take longer than bushed variants to wear out. They weigh 3kg each and are of steel construction with alloy ferrules and lock rings.

I have a few sets in stock, ready for delivery at $425 Delivered Aust Wide.

Pics & Info:

D-Project Adjustable FRONT UPPER CONTROL ARM - ADJUSTABLE FRONT Camber ARM

Suits: Skyline R32 300ZX Z32

  • Adjustable Camber for the Front - Align your front tyres for maximum grip or minimum tyre wear!

  • Forged Steel Construction - 3kg Weight EACH ARM

  • Easy to Install - Simply Remove and Refit!

  • On Car Adjustable - Easy to align and adjust - even when trackside

  • GENUINE NSK JAPANESE BEARINGS USED - Low Friction and Less binding as the wheel travels!

  • Unique Design allows for PERFECT fitment on R32 and Z32

  • Specifically designed for the rigors of all track racing as well as street performance

  • Special introductory Price for the first 3 sets sold!

  • Easy to DIY Install! As simple as remove and refit to install and adjust on car!

$425 Delivered For the pair!

Arms For Left and Right!

IMG_8153.jpg

Special Offset for Compatibility for Z32 Models!

IMG_8163.jpg

Genuine JAPANESE Construction with JAPANESE NSK Bearings.

IMG_8137.jpg

More info on D-Project parts etc for skylines.

http://www.nissansilvia.com/forums/index.p...amp;pid=4867153

Send me a PM to order >_<

I have given up on hoping to buy something half decent to put in the front of my R32R. So I made my own. When I say I made it, well I sketched it before giving to the draftie, who gave it to the fitter who gave it to the boilermaker/welder, who gave it back to the fitter who gave it to me to fit. Anyway it appears to work & confer heroic amounts of -ve camber on the front. :P

I used the Whiteline bush kit. The ends are matched to the same length & id as the stock components, the trail is 22(ish)mms from memory & the length I settled on was 170mm. Bolted up nicely.

How/what do you think of the Nismo mounts and their finctionality?

How/what do you think of the Nismo mounts and their finctionality?

Well I am not sure they are worth the coin Nissan charge for them but they work & help fix some of the issues the R32's have with front end geometry. So whilst I still begrudge the amount I had to pay & also the amount of time it took to remove the ABS unit & the master cylinder to fit the things in I am pretty pleased with the result.

Well I am not sure they are worth the coin Nissan charge for them but they work & help fix some of the issues the R32's have with front end geometry. So whilst I still begrudge the amount I had to pay & also the amount of time it took to remove the ABS unit & the master cylinder to fit the things in I am pretty pleased with the result.

Were you able to source just the mounting brackets on their own or have to buy the kit?

If you got them on there own then where?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, apparently they do fit, however this wont be a problem if not because the car will be stationary while i do the suspension work. I was just going to use the 16's to roll the old girl around if I needed to. I just need to get the E90 back on the road first. Yes! I'm a believer! 🙌 So, I contacted them because the site kinda sucks and I was really confused about what I'd need. They put together a package for me and because I was spraying all the seat surfaces and not doing spot fixes I decided not to send them a headrest to colour match, I just used their colour on file (and it was spot on).  I got some heavy duty cleaner, 1L of colour, a small bottle of dye hardener and a small bottle of the dye top coat. I also got a spray gun as I needed a larger nozzle than the gun I had and it was only $40 extra. From memory the total was ~$450 ish. Its not cheap but the result is awesome. They did add repair bits and pieces to the quote originally and the cost came down significantly when I said I didn't need any repair products. I did it over a weekend. The only issues I had were my own; I forgot to mix the hardener into the dye two coats but I had enough dye for 2 more coats with the hardener. I also just used up all the dye because why not and i rushed the last coat which gave me some runs. Thankfully the runs are under the headrests. The gun pattern wasn't great, very round and would have been better if it was a line. It made it a little tricky to get consistent coverage and I think having done the extra coats probably helped conceal any coverage issues. I contacted them again a few months later so I could get our X5 done (who the f**k thought white leather was a good idea for a family car?!) and they said they had some training to do in Sydney and I could get a reduced rate on the leather fix in the X5 if I let them demo their product on our car. So I agreed. When I took Bec in the E39 to pick it up, I showed them the job I'd done in my car and they were all (students included) really impressed. Note that they said the runs I created could be fixed easily at the time with a brush or an air compressor gun. So, now with the two cars done I can absolutely recommend Colourlock.  I'll take pics of both interiors and create a new thread.
    • Power is fed to the ECU when the ignition switch is switched to IGN, at terminal 58. That same wire also connects to the ECCS relay to provide both the coil power and the contact side. When the ECU sees power at 58 it switches 16 to earth, which pulls the ECCS relay on, which feeds main power into the ECU and also to a bunch of other things. None of this is directly involved in the fuel pump - it just has to happen first. The ECU will pull terminal 18 to earth when it wants the fuel pump to run. This allows the fuel pump relay to pull in, which switches power on into the rest of the fuel pump control equipment. The fuel pump control regulator is controlled from terminal 104 on the ECU and is switched high or low depending on whether the ECU thinks the pump needs to run high or low. (I don't know which way around that is, and it really doesn't matter right now). The fuel pump control reg is really just a resistor that controls how the power through the pump goes to earth. Either straight to earth, or via the resistor. This part doesn't matter much to us today. The power to the fuel pump relay comes from one of the switched wires from the IGN switch and fusebox that is not shown off to the left of this page. That power runs the fuel pump relay coil and a number of other engine peripherals. Those peripherals don't really matter. All that matters is that there should be power available at the relay when the key is in the right position. At least - I think it's switched. If it's not switched, then power will be there all the time. Either way, if you don't have power there when you need it (ie, key on) then it won't work. The input-output switching side of the relay gains its power from a line similar (but not the same as) the one that feeds the ECU. SO I presume that is switched. Again, if there is not power there when you need it, then you have to look upstream. And... the upshot of all that? There is no "ground" at the fuel pump relay. Where you say: and say that pin 1 Black/Pink is ground, that is not true. The ECU trigger is AF73, is black/pink, and is the "ground". When the ECU says it is. The Blue/White wire is the "constant" 12V to power the relay's coil. And when I say "constant", I mean it may well only be on when the key is on. As I said above. So, when the ECU says not to be running the pump (which is any time after about 3s of switching on, with no crank signal or engine speed yet), then you should see 12V at both 1 and 2. Because the 12V will be all the way up to the ECU terminal 18, waiting to be switched to ground. When the ECU switches the fuel pump on, then AF73 should go to ~0V, having been switched to ground and the voltage drop now occurring over the relay coil. 3 & 5 are easy. 5 is the other "constant" 12V, that may or may not be constant but will very much want to be there when the key is on. Same as above. 3 goes to the pump. There should never be 12V visible at 3 unless the relay is pulled in. As to where the immobiliser might have been spliced into all this.... It will either have to be on wire AF70 or AF71, whichever is most accessible near the alarm. Given that all those wires run from the engine bay fusebox or the ECU, via the driver's area to the rear of the car, it could really be either. AF70 will be the same colour from the appropriate fuse all the way to the pump. If it has been cut and is dangling, you should be able to see that  in that area somewhere. Same with AF71.   You really should be able to force the pump to run. Just jump 12V onto AF72 and it should go. That will prove that the pump itself is willing to go along with you when you sort out the upstream. You really should be able to force the fuel pump relay on. Just short AF73 to earth when the key is on. If the pump runs, then the relay is fine, and all the power up to both inputs on the relay is fine. If it doesn't run (and given that you checked the relay itself actually works) then one or both of AF70 and AF71 are not bringing power to the game.
    • @PranK can you elaborate further on the Colorlock Dye? The website has a lot of options. I'm sure you've done all the research. I have old genuine leather seats that I have bought various refurbing creams and such, but never a dye. Any info on how long it lasts? Does it wash out? Is it a hassle? What product do I actually need? Am I just buying this kit and following the steps the page advises or something else? https://www.colourlockaustralia.com.au/colourlock-leather-repair-kit-dye.html
    • These going to fit over the big brakes? I'd be reeeeeeeeaaaall hesitant to believe so.
    • The leather work properly stunned me. Again, I am thankful that the leather was in such good condition. I'm not sure what the indent is at the top of the passenger seat. Like somebody was sitting in it with a golf ball between their shoulders. The wheels are more grey than silver now and missing a lot of gloss.  Here's one with nice silver wheels.
×
×
  • Create New...