Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi admins

I had an idea a little while ago about a forum for workshop feedback (see this thread: http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Go...html&st=20)

Anyway my idea is that there would be a forum, perhaps split into state sections, where people could post feedback on workshops without any form of endorsement from SAU itself. Each workshop would be entitled to a single thread and there would be no stickies / preference given to any particular workshop, allowing honest feedback and discussion.

There would be rules to cover slanderous comments and people would have to stick to the facts strictly as well. That's not to say that workshops couldn't get a negative rap, but it would have to be a factious negative rap without slander and sticking to what actually happened etc.

Regards

Ian

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/248912-workshop-feedback-forum/
Share on other sites

Hi admins

I had an idea a little while ago about a forum for workshop feedback (see this thread: http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Go...html&st=20)

Anyway my idea is that there would be a forum, perhaps split into state sections, where people could post feedback on workshops without any form of endorsement from SAU itself. Each workshop would be entitled to a single thread and there would be no stickies / preference given to any particular workshop, allowing honest feedback and discussion.

There would be rules to cover slanderous comments and people would have to stick to the facts strictly as well. That's not to say that workshops couldn't get a negative rap, but it would have to be a factious negative rap without slander and sticking to what actually happened etc.

Regards

Ian

I think thats a great idea

Sorry - there is no negative or otherwise allowed on SAU

This is so that SAU exists, and continues to exist for many years without issue.

We've had a number of legal challenges over the years and really dont need a single one of them.

There is always two sides to every story, and sadly, you'll never know the truth, there is no way to prove events and so on.

If people have such an issue with a workshop, take them to court and then post up the details once a court decides you are right.

Sorry - there is no negative or otherwise allowed on SAU

This is so that SAU exists, and continues to exist for many years without issue.

We've had a number of legal challenges over the years and really dont need a single one of them.

There is always two sides to every story, and sadly, you'll never know the truth, there is no way to prove events and so on.

If people have such an issue with a workshop, take them to court and then post up the details once a court decides you are right.

This seems grossly unfair on the consumers, who are the vast majority of the population of this forum. As it currently stands, workshops are getting away with daylight robbery and dodgy work every day and they are not being held to account because everyone's too scared.

Lawsuits are expensive, drawn out things which often drag peoples names, including the workshops, through the mud and few every make it to trial, most being settled out of court. I doubt that most workshops, which run on a pretty tight budget, would be able to marshal sufficient resources to make a proper attack on a public forum, and even then, if in the course of the trial it comes out that the original complaint was correct, as it most likely will, then it will be thrown from court.

It would be far more affordable for a workshop to simply fix their fu**ups as they should have done anyway.

However I respect your decision, as gutless as it is.

This seems grossly unfair on the consumers, who are the vast majority of the population of this forum. As it currently stands, workshops are getting away with daylight robbery and dodgy work every day and they are not being held to account because everyone's too scared.

Lawsuits are expensive, drawn out things which often drag peoples names, including the workshops, through the mud and few every make it to trial, most being settled out of court. I doubt that most workshops, which run on a pretty tight budget, would be able to marshal sufficient resources to make a proper attack on a public forum, and even then, if in the course of the trial it comes out that the original complaint was correct, as it most likely will, then it will be thrown from court.

It would be far more affordable for a workshop to simply fix their fu**ups as they should have done anyway.

However I respect your decision, as gutless as it is.

Feel free to create your own forum and implement the aforementioned section.

+1

couldn't have said it better.

You probably could have if you tried.

This seems grossly unfair on the consumers, who are the vast majority of the population of this forum. As it currently stands, workshops are getting away with daylight robbery and dodgy work every day and they are not being held to account because everyone's too scared.

Lawsuits are expensive, drawn out things which often drag peoples names, including the workshops, through the mud and few every make it to trial, most being settled out of court. I doubt that most workshops, which run on a pretty tight budget, would be able to marshal sufficient resources to make a proper attack on a public forum, and even then, if in the course of the trial it comes out that the original complaint was correct, as it most likely will, then it will be thrown from court.

It would be far more affordable for a workshop to simply fix their fu**ups as they should have done anyway.

However I respect your decision, as gutless as it is.

Gutless? Oh please.

This forum exists, and continues to exist due to smart and careful administration.

Do you want to pay our legal fees for any legal challenges that come up? (as they have in the past, and I'm not joking)

I'll take the liberty to answer it for you - Your going to say - No.

So until such a time as you are willing, and its in writing, such a section will not exist.

I also know a few other Forum Owners of various sites, and this is a reasonable issue. One decent court case will spell the end of a forum, simple as that.

To call it a gutless decision to keep the forums here, for everyone, is stupid and ignorant.

Feel free to go and start your own forum, pay for the server, software and everything else. Then you might understand a thing or two about where we come from

Feel free to go and start your own forum, pay for the server, software and everything else. Then you might understand a thing or two about where we come from

well, okay, I've been thinking about creating a website for workshop reviews for a while now anyway. Believe it or not, but I already understand a thing or two about web hosting etc, im in my final year at QUT doing a Bachelor of IT.

Dont take this the wrong way, I don't wish to start a pissing contest with you, you have your policy of protecting workshops from negative feedback and thats fine, I believe I can create a system which should work without risk. I can understand your position, as much as I don't agree with it, and im happy to host the website myself and meet the costs of hosting etc.

Ill have a URL for you within a week. :(

Regards

Ian

I do understand mate. I just think that your maybe being a bit over-protective.

A few interesting reads for you:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...t&p=4320011

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...t&p=4319931

Anyway I dont want to get into an argument, your an admin on this forum and its not exactly a fair playing field. I have stated my case, you told me no, make your own forum and I will.

Regards

Ian

I do understand mate. I just think that your maybe being a bit over-protective.

A few interesting reads for you:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...t&p=4320011

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...t&p=4319931

Anyway I dont want to get into an argument, your an admin on this forum and its not exactly a fair playing field. I have stated my case, you told me no, make your own forum and I will.

Regards

Ian

That is fantastic to hear about your IT degree :nyaanyaa: Well done.

All the best with your forums mate :rofl:

Cheers

I have registered the domain and setup a basic forum, waiting for the DNS to propagate and have had some help writing up a disclaimer etc, also need to do some other small things then it should be underway.

I haven't laid out a huge outlay for hosting etc yet, we will see if the idea takes off before I invest more money into it.

Cheers

I have registered the domain and setup a basic forum, waiting for the DNS to propagate and have had some help writing up a disclaimer etc, also need to do some other small things then it should be underway.

I haven't laid out a huge outlay for hosting etc yet, we will see if the idea takes off before I invest more money into it.

Sounds good man. How much did you pay for the disclaimer?

  • 2 months later...
we will see if the idea takes off before I invest more money into it.

I'm guessing it didn't take off?

For the record, I don't protect businesses, on the contrary, I love seeing businesses get whats coming to them when they deserve it, but a lot of the time a disgruntled customer can cause a lot of damage to a businesses reputation when, as Ash said, there is always two sides to the story. I had a lengthy phone call with a QLD importer just yesterday about comments made on the forums that were unjust, he explained the situation and I removed the thread. It was only fair as I was able to see the argument from both sides.

On a side note, if we can get workshops / businesses to sign a disclaimer freeing SAU from any legal responsibility regardless of what is posted, then yeah, I'm more than happy to have the feedback for that business posted, but how many businesses / workshops do you think will be willing to sign something like that?

Ian, I like your passion man, seriously. I think you underestimate how much time we put into making this place run the way it does. No decisions are made without lots of thought and sometimes legal advice (such as in this case).

C

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...