Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'd love to see a gtx3076r making over 400rwkw on an RB. The curve should be pretty nuts.

Even better would be someone running two of them, high mounted on any kind of RB engine bigger than 2.6L otherwise I suspect the lag would be too much....even though it would feel insane when it did get some meaningful boost and it would have such a short RPM range where it just piles on the power increase. Would be a wild ride!

but a built RB with a GTX3076 would sh*t it in. I will check out the HTA76 further Lithium but I think the compressor housing is a little too big. Does it still run the Garrett rear?

Are you talking about on the VQ? I was aiming the response at Dajae who appears to have a Skyline, wouldn't think it should have a problem there. The FP turbos have OEM Garrett housings, though as you seem to be aware all use the .70a/r comp housings.

I'm not 100% sure why people are excited about the GTX3076Rs tbh. The comp wheel doesn't flow as much as a GT3582R compressor, and a back to back dyno with a GT3082R has proven them to offer no better spool. There hasn't been anything yet to make me feel like they are something special, they flow like they are a bigger than a GT3076R and spool that way too - more lag and more power are just a typical trade off.

In all honesty so far I prefer the idea of a Kando T67!

Spool 3.4

Awesome! Mine is going on a spool 2.8 kit. They're a nice bit of kit, too :)

Thanks Lith, will look into the FP range. I know the evo guys have good results with them.

N1, makes two of ua mate! :D i hope to push that boundary soon :) and if the results look promising on the 3.4, even better :)

Are you talking about on the VQ? I was aiming the response at Dajae who appears to have a Skyline, wouldn't think it should have a problem there. The FP turbos have OEM Garrett housings, though as you seem to be aware all use the .70a/r comp housings.

I'm not 100% sure why people are excited about the GTX3076Rs tbh. The comp wheel doesn't flow as much as a GT3582R compressor, and a back to back dyno with a GT3082R has proven them to offer no better spool. There hasn't been anything yet to make me feel like they are something special, they flow like they are a bigger than a GT3076R and spool that way too - more lag and more power are just a typical trade off.

In all honesty so far I prefer the idea of a Kando T67!

Yeh sorry, VQ.

I can only go by what Garrett's maps tell me, the GTX3076 flows more than the GT35 and the FP HTA. Hopefully they aren't talking crap.

post-63525-0-92606700-1329880051_thumb.gif

post-63525-0-84760000-1329880069_thumb.jpg

That GT3582R compressor map isn't right... see from Garrett:

714568-allcomp.jpg

Either way, more than enough to way outflow the GT30 imho which makes it pointless having that much compressor imho. Again, I am not at all convinced that a GTX3076R will make any more power than a FP HTA GT3076R.

^ as above, can only but try. The compressor is not the only part of the equation, even if the compressor CAN move x amount of air at y amount of boost its irrelevant if either the engine, the fuel system, the other boltons, the turbine housing/wheel, or any other part of the car isn't up to supporting that power figure.

Air leaks are the worst one, you often can't hear them and they aren't bad enough to effect day to day driving, but on boost if they start wasting compressor flow will kill power.

I wish more tuners would insist on doing a smoke test before tuning a car these days.

^ as above, can only but try. The compressor is not the only part of the equation, even if the compressor CAN move x amount of air at y amount of boost its irrelevant if either the engine, the fuel system, the other boltons, the turbine housing/wheel, or any other part of the car isn't up to supporting that power figure.

Agreed. I think i have everything needed to achieve it, or atleast get close. Head has had some decent work done, although im steering towards oversize valves to help out a bit. And some decent cams. Im still reading up on threads relating to e85 though..

I hear good things about pierburg (spelling?) fuel pumps.. :)

The end of next week, not much dyno time needed, only enough to make sure the new TB and stuff is working right.

Goes in on Tues night or Wends morning which is when Ill drop of the sump for Stevo.

It will be good not to be loosing all that air, it couldnt even get the pressure up past 2psi (If I remember right) on the smoke test machine bottle gauge thingie as the leak was so bad. pinch.gif

Dajae - I bought a pierburg but haven't fitted it yet...I created a thread on my findings and what I can tell you is that it flows more than the aeromotive stealth by a decent margin but I can't recall the figures exactly.

As a comparison, Bosch 044 flows 200ltrs/min @ 5bar whereas the pierburg flows 360ltrs/min @ 5bar.

They are not cheap so expect to pay about $450 with a filter.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have you done the Ignition Sync Wizard in the AEM software?
    • Find out what RPM it was idling at with the IACV unplugged. It's very weird that the rpm didn't change at all, and then it stalled. When it stalls is it nearly like a switch off, like you've turned the engine off? Or is it more stutters and sputters and coughs to death over a few seconds? Or does the RPM just slowly keep going down and down? Have you done a test of trying to start it with the AFM unplugged? Does it still die?     If you Follow Josh's advice on using Nistune to check the voltages (which is a perfect method!) if you see anything out of wack voltage wise, THEN get the multimeter out and read the voltage directly at the sensor. If the two vary, then you're now looking for a wiring issue vs a sensor issue. So be aware, what the ECU sees, may not be what the sensor is actually saying too...
    • You very likely need to get it on a dyno and tune it. My assumption is, you've got an RB25DET tune in it, which has a different manifold, different injectors, and different cams as a minimum. What O2 sensor are you running?   When you say it runs extremely rich from idle all the way to redline, is this just free revving it you see that?
    • I seem to the be only person that is using a Haltech 2500 on an NA motor, I've installed a Bosch DBW throttle body to the OEM intake manifold and am having problems maintaining AFR even with the wideband o2.  It will run extremely rich at idle and up to redline, but under load it will go extremely lean in the 20s and i'm essentially having to rev it over 4k and feather the clutch to get it up to speed.  I've read a few other threads of about the butterfly, it seems removing the vacuum to it is supposed to have it remain open, i've noticed no difference under 4k with the vacuum line to it plugged.  I'm hoping someone here has had luck using the NA manifold with Haltech, and if they happen to have a tune for it.  
    • I don't know any details, but I really wouldn't be surprised if they do it as a LHD only version, at least initially.
×
×
  • Create New...