Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts



480kw on vp 109 and dash 5s @ 23psi, BACKED UP with repeated 140+mph runs. It can be done, just not by many :D

Mark32 being on powerplus rated at 108 would be pretty damn close to vp race fuel, i dont see why every one is getting their panties in a knot. Edited by linkems

I don't understand what the issue is. e85, increasing boost later in the rpm range, and 'at the limit' tuning probably explain the nice graph

20psi @ 4700rpm sounds very good, but reasonable

700Nm @ 5000 rpm sounds very good, but reasonable

nobody else even talks about, let alone posts graphs, about increasing boost with rpm. that's probably the main reason for the high peak power.

480kw on vp 109 and dash 5s @ 23psi, BACKED UP with repeated 140+mph runs. It can be done, just not by many :D

Mark32 being on powerplus rated at 108 would be pretty damn close to vp race fuel, i dont see why every one is getting their panties in a knot.

Finally someone with some backed up proof.

How much does your car weigh? I suspect you have more than 480kw

the specs from that video:

HKS 2,8l stroker kit + twin GT2860-5 + nismo intake plenum + greddy 264 cams + 1000cc RC injectors + Apexi D-Jetro + Almasi tuning

the scale on the torque curve looks wrong, but the power curve looks accurate

http://www.gtrpwr.co...thread.php?t=62

Skylinebestdynoresult.jpg

Edited by black bnr32

Yeah most people don't, but sometimes it's gotta be done because everyone else around then expects it to be "the norm"... And then we end up with more and more threads like "why am i down on power", when in actual fact they are perfectly fine... They are just expecting something that's not reasonable and trying to explain this to such users can be about as productive as belting ones head against a wall (similar to telling the GTX/500rwkw person that it was not possible, but we were all haters :/)

And for the record, there are no mini-me's running around that i know of :ph34r:

If you think thats BS, i know one person who got "498rwkw" out of -5's on PUMP and when i asked him to back it up with MPH he said its an inaccurate way to calculate power! the fark lol.

There is a guy in NZ that claims mid 500kw on pump on GT2860Rs who is a fairly respected track racer etc, which sounds like crap - even on a high reading dyno. The trap speed argument has come up but he has no interest in drag racing, conveniently.

There is a guy in NZ that claims mid 500kw on pump on GT2860Rs who is a fairly respected track racer etc, which sounds like crap - even on a high reading dyno. The trap speed argument has come up but he has no interest in drag racing, conveniently.

We have no interest in believing him then

There is a guy in NZ that claims mid 500kw on pump on GT2860Rs who is a fairly respected track racer etc, which sounds like crap - even on a high reading dyno. The trap speed argument has come up but he has no interest in drag racing, conveniently.

Dumb comment old boy

Maybe this engine is just more efficient than all the others using the same turbos hence the higher power....

And saying that the 1/4 is the real dyno works to a degree if you have traction. But what if your running street tyres and no traction at all like Marks 32 could be wheel spinning across the line in 5th gear and still run under 120mph....

But we also have nice clean air down here in Tassie....

Edited by WHITER33GTS-T

He also has a 2.8 maybe even a 3.0 bottom end.

Different ball game to the normal 2.6

Yet another keyboard god that knows everything from behind the computer screen just ask him....

Try geting some real world experience old boy instead of just reading the interwebs then thinking your an expert on everything

Maybe this engine is just more efficient than all the others using the same turbos hence the higher power....

And saying that the 1/4 is the real dyno works to a degree if you have traction. But what if your running street tyres and no traction at all like Marks 32 could be wheel spinning across the line in 5th gear and still run under 120mph....

But we also have nice clean air down here in Tassie....

The clean air must help a shit-load Rob, and you know better that anyone a lot of cars have been on that dyno and he's not the sort of bloke to produce stupid unrealistic dyno results.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
    • Probably not. A workshop grade scantool is my go to for proper Consult interrogation. Any workshop grade tool should do it. Just go to a workshop.
    • In my head it does make sense to be a fuel problem since that is what I touched when cleaning the system. When I was testing with the fuel pressure gauge, the pressure was constantly 2.5 bar with the FPR vacuum removed. When stalling, the pressure was going up to 3.0 bar (which is how it should be on ignition).
    • ECUtalk pages don't mention they support the ABS computer (consult port has more than one CAN), so you might just need a different scan tool. But, I would expect ABS is a different light to the brake warning/handbrake light, do you see an ABS light come on for a few seconds when you turn the key from ACC to IGN? But since you said: I'd have a look at the ABS sensors in the rear hubs to make sure they are not damaged, disconnected etc.
    • OK, if it idles at 1000+ with the AAC, its not an idle airflow problem. The cold start valve just gives extra air when the engine is cold, but you have enough air without it to idle at 1000. I think you are back to a fuel problem, sorry. Can you see the fuel pressure staying constant or does it drop as the revs drop to a stall?  
×
×
  • Create New...