Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Yep, pretty hard to actually race dyno graphs.......

My tuner told me once the only figure he cares about is the one on the podium.

Because race car!

This is my point. So really dyno tuning is for tuning not rattling off numbers. Real track numbers are the only ones that matter. So why do people waste their time asking for builds based on power numbers. Every car that I have ever modified I have never really cared about anything else except how it performs when I drive it or race it. Don't know. Must be getting old.

This is my point. So really dyno tuning is for tuning not rattling off numbers. Real track numbers are the only ones that matter. So why do people waste their time asking for builds based on power numbers. Every car that I have ever modified I have never really cared about anything else except how it performs when I drive it or race it. Don't know. Must be getting old.

You can still base your mods/builds on power figures, but when you are using the dyno as the comparative tool rather than the track, the reality can sometimes be skewed. If you race against someone and they are 0.1 second faster around the circuit and you make X amount of hp, you then know you've either gotta make X + 50, get better suspension or tune the suspension or just get better at driving.

You're not old, you're just wiser. We are slowly educating our customers as much as possible but it's a slow task. If they ever leave here with a low power figure on the print out, we always tell them to drive it and call back if they are disappointed.....or run it down the 1/4 and compare it to their previous result.

It's just common sense really

After much reading I think the only way to settle this is a "Rate my fun Car Thread"

Show how much fun your having in your skyline and then it gets rated from 1 - 10 by your peers.

Maybe we could factor in how many kilometers the car does a year to show the true useableness of said car.

I'm pretty sure the 400kw thread can be locked now.

402kw 10.81et 131.36mph. As per 2wd dyno dynamics dyno.

So is it safe to say that to run these numbers this is the power you need?

Maybe we need to start multiple threads 9 sec cars, 10 sec cars, 11sec cars so people can post their times, mods and driving style. Just a thought

So why do people waste their time asking for builds based on power numbers. Every car that I have ever modified I have never really cared about anything else except how it performs when I drive it or race it. Don't know. Must be getting old.

We tend to get used to what general effect x.kw on a familiar dyno has on the way a car goes. Case in point, I have been helping out with the tuning on a mates S14 track car - he has got weight down to around 1090kg and he figured that 250-270kw @ hubs on the local hub dyno would make more than sufficient to have an awesome amount of fun with it. From there we were able to work out that sweet - a "350hp" rated turbo, a stock SR20DET and E85 should work together fairly well together to provide somewhere in that territory. Again, it wasn't to create claims to show off on forums - it was just more the knowledge that the power figure on that dyno should be able to allow for a fairly reliable but quick car.

Who cares if it would be maybe "only" 230-240kw on a Dyno Dynamics dyno or 300kw on a dyno set up to inflate figures? We know that it would be a figure that it can be competitive and reliable on the track in the type of racing he wants to do as well as be fun to drive. This all comes down to the "Dyno is a tuning too" thing, you can compare between results on that same dyno and fine tune different aspects to suit your requirements.

We tend to get used to what general effect x.kw on a familiar dyno has on the way a car goes. Case in point, I have been helping out with the tuning on a mates S14 track car - he has got weight down to around 1090kg and he figured that 250-270kw @ hubs on the local hub dyno would make more than sufficient to have an awesome amount of fun with it. From there we were able to work out that sweet - a "350hp" rated turbo, a stock SR20DET and E85 should work together fairly well together to provide somewhere in that territory. Again, it wasn't to create claims to show off on forums - it was just more the knowledge that the power figure on that dyno should be able to allow for a fairly reliable but quick car.

Who cares if it would be maybe "only" 230-240kw on a Dyno Dynamics dyno or 300kw on a dyno set up to inflate figures? We know that it would be a figure that it can be competitive and reliable on the track in the type of racing he wants to do as well as be fun to drive. This all comes down to the "Dyno is a tuning too" thing, you can compare between results on that same dyno and fine tune different aspects to suit your requirements.

Spot on. its a tuning tool and the only relavence to its figures is when it needs to be used to modify the engine management computer to optimise engine efficiency..nothing to do with comparing to another dyno down the road.

Also in a street car engine power does not necessarily relate to how quick your car is. An example is when I was active on the ls1 forums there were cars running 0.5 seconds quicker down the quarter with 50 rwkw less, why, because of hi stalls and diff gears and rear suspension setups and all streetable not radical stuff AND a good healthy tune. In other words there cars were efficient for their purpose and drivers knew how to drive. Higher dyno HP really means nothing to me.

If I had to get an engine built (which I am) I say to my mechanic I want to run low 10s in my daily. He should tell me what he is going to do and how much and when. When I get it back and after run in or whatever he tells me to do.....I want it running low 10s and I don't care if its got 300 400 or 500awkw.

I know its a rant but hopefully it helps steer the younger crew into the older ways of thinking....pipe dream maybe

Standard weight 32 or 33 GTR / GTST that runs 129-130 mph has 400rwkw

That's based on everything from 1400-1450kg (3100-3200lb)

@ 1550kg (3400lb) it needs to be about 125mph

And lets not forget.. Driver could be anywhere from 70kg through to 120kg.. Tanks of fuel or empty changes things by another possible 50kg..

(not disagreeing with you by the way - just pointing out even this has a bearing on it)

My car with 120.8rwkw on Unique autosports dyno ran 14.58 @ 95mph (97.6MPH Best). 1450kg 300zx. Injector Duty Cycle at 85% approx 270cc.

Edited by Super Drager

And lets not forget.. Driver could be anywhere from 70kg through to 120kg.. Tanks of fuel or empty changes things by another possible 50kg..

(not disagreeing with you by the way - just pointing out even this has a bearing on it)

Most definitely. Half a tank of fuel changes your mph by 1. Another 25kg around the belly can cancel that out too haha.

So us fat bastards need to race on 1/4 tank to be just as fast

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...