Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've never liked either brand. Soundstream go for looks before functionality which is stupid in the world of audio, and response is cheap...

if that is a WRMS rating, then good, otherwise I wouldn't be seen near those two brands...

but that's me, it will still make noise

beg to differ mate soundstream have been leading the audio industry for years,

any way

www.bitaudio.com.au

get some bargains on here mate

600 is a bit rich for the sub and don't buy a shitty amp for a good sub,

i would go for 12 having owned the 15 and the 12(the 10 inch is a very good sub aswell) and the t5s are much better than the t4s

and spend some money on a custom box

hope that helps

Edited by G-Money

Im gonna have to stand up and defend the Prescision Resonse range of audio products. ther are great quality and actually perform like they say they do in there advertising (like on the packaging with power outputs).

people dont fancy the stuff becuase it has a low price tag when if you actually know anythihng about car audio you will know how many awards the entire range of amps have won.

end of day, its a grand that uses quality components and perform well.

good luck with watever you choose

I also have to agree with chris. I would use a response monoblock before even thinking about using say a pioneer / kenwood / JL amp.

They have recieved numerous awards for their amps and GENUINE power rating which state in RMS and not " maximum output "

These amps are sturdy and can take abuse. Ive owned 3 Response amps and have never had a bad day with them. Great input / output RCA functionality and can be tuned to your preferred music.

MRXTCZ

Hmmm... spose my level of audio is a little different to the standard stuff... I'm not sure Response make anything that can power my gear, and I doubt I could fit a soundstream amp in my car :D

Hmmm... spose my level of audio is a little different to the standard stuff... I'm not sure Response make anything that can power my gear, and I doubt I could fit a soundstream amp in my car :D

When Soundstream were made in USA, their amps was really good! Now, I must say, they are sh*t

hahahaha someone is being a brand wh0re... Response products are far more superior than that Kenwood/Sony/Pioneer junk you see all over the market.

I've been installing car audio in a few of my mate's cars, and all I ever buy are Response Kevlar splits, Response 4x100 digital amps and guess what? they sound better than those flashy brand names.

I own a response amp... 4x100 actually... it's a good solid amp for people starting out, but it's no longer enough power for me... my mate his it in his supra now...

Maybe I should just be saying that i don't buy cheap audio gear... I understand that for something twice the price, you're probably only getting something one and a half times better, so it's not worth the money, but it's something I enjoy :D Price is literally the last thing I look at when buying audio gear...

and I haven't even mentioned a single brand I run in the car yet :D

Ohh old doofskies ..

haha.

Im not saying the response amp stands anything against DD Mono's DDZ2-LV's or DD Mono DDZ2-HV's..

But.. like you said .. for the novice in car audio its a good stepping stone.. thank god i never touched a sony amp in my life.. or those Boss audio 1000WATTS OF POWAH! amps .. -.-

Anyways.. Response is a great brand .. and have the awards to back it up .. its great for the guys who just want a thumping system, on a budget.

Ive got all my gear hooked up to my jaycar amps.. but once i decide to run my splits active and get Rockford Fosgate P3 DVC's then i will definately need something bigger .. but will always keep the Response D-Class mono in mind :P

MRXTCZ

that's the old serious, look at their new range of their Digital Amps!

no idea about the S/N ratio, but I can tell you they're a decent buy....

I've installed 2 lots of them and I can tell you, they're nice and clear and don't lack the frequency range of a more expensive amp.

Yeah I'm form CAA.. lol now called MEA, but I have a different username there.

There was a review on kenwood, alpine, clarion, response and a few others about a year or 2 ago.

Pretty sure it was in Zoom magazine, see if i've got it floating around, I'll scan and put it up.

Check the ohm rating if you are using response amp with a soundstream subwoofer as i recall their subwoofers ran at 3 ohm's, dont go blowing up your newly aquired gear.

The Response came out on top for both the the amplifiers and sub's, followed by Clarion then the other

brand there after.

You dont need to spend a fortune to get quality.

Sometimes people spend a fortune on on the bigger names and it sounds like crap.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I will rebutt this and the preceding point from Dose....but without doing any calcs to demonstrate anything and without knowing that I am right or wrong. But... The flow capacity of a fluid transfer system is not limited by the smallest orifice or section of conduit in that system, unless it is drastically smaller than the rest of the system. OK, I use the word drastically perhaps with too much emphasis, but let's drill down on what I really mean. The flow capacity of the system is the result of the sum of the restrictions of the entire system. So, to make an extreme example, if you have a network with 3" pipe everywhere (and let's say a total length of only a few metres) and that 12mm ID restriction of the oil filter connection being the obvious restriction, then for any given amount of pressure available, the vast majority of all the pressure drop in the system is going to occur in the 12mm restriction. But.... increase the length of the 3" pipeline to, say 1000m, and suddenly the pipe pressure loss will likely add up to either be in the same order of magnitude, possibly even exceeding that of the 12mm restriction. Now the 12mm restriction starts to matter less. Translate this to the actual engine, actual oil cooler hose sizing, etc etc, and perhaps: The pressure loss caused by flowing through the narrow section (being the 12mm oil filter port, and perhaps any internal engine oil flow pathways associated with it) is a certain number. The pressure loss through, say, -12 hoses out to the cooler and back is negligible, but The pressure loss through -10 hoses out to the cooler, at the exact same length as the above, starts to become a decent fraction of the loss through the 12mm stuff at the filter port. Maybe even it starts to exceed it. I could actually do these calcs if I knew 1) how much oil was actually flowing in the line, 2) gave enough of a f**k to do things that I hate doing for work, voluntarily for a hypothetical discussion. Anyway - I reiterate. It's not the narrowest port that necessarily determines how much it can all flow. It is the sum. A long enough length of seemingly fat enough pipe can still cause more loss than a semmingly dominant small bore restriction.
    • To pick up what Dose is putting down. Not a lot of point running a huge hose if the motor is still restricted to the smaller size... It's only capable of flowing so much at that point...   *Waits for GTSBoy to come in and bring in the technicalities of length of pipe, and additional restriction from wall friction etc etc*
    • Hooley Dooley these things have some history! If i sell them they will need a certificate of providence to prove they have been in the hands of verified RB20 royalty! They have been stored in a plastic tub, away from sunlight and moisture. They are in mint condition. And they will stay that way, as i have sprung the money for a set of shockworks coilovers. I'm just working on getting them in at the moment, after rebushing the rear of the car, and while the subframe was out i welded in the GKtech reinforcement bracing as well.  They will get a workout at Ararat King of The Hill in November. I ran 48s on the short course there a few months ago, and i am hoping with new bushes and shocks in the rear i can launch a bit harder. There was a fair bit of axle tramp when i tried too hard off the line. a few of the corners had dips mid way which also made the car feel a bit unsettled, hopefully this will help there too.   
    • Food for thought, the stock oil filter thread is a 3/4-16 UNF, which has an ID of about 10 to 12mm (according to ChatGPT lol). Now compare than to an 10AN, which has an ID of about 14mm (Raceworks is 14.2mm, Speed flow is 14.27mm).  
    • Yep, totally get that. However hooking in for Generator back up is only a few hundred bucks for the wiring. You could put a couple of those in (for different circuits explicitly) and run a couple of baby generators. Bonus, you can balance them across different circuits, and now have backups in your backup. I'm looking at buying places that won't even have water etc, and I don't mind the idea of getting off the electric grid either, even with everything you've said. This country already has enough power outages that even the mains grid isn't that reliable anymore. I do agree though on spending a bit more to get better gear, and to add some extra redundancy in to the system too.
×
×
  • Create New...