Jump to content
SAU Community

-7/9s Or -5s Garretts

Adz2332

By Adz2332,
in Engines & Forced Induction

 Share

Recommended Posts

shy_s6 Veteran

shy_s6

Posted
Posted

heya bud didnt mean to sound rude if i did, from the info ive gathered i just thought at 20psi it would have been more like 350-360rwkw

this was a previous persons, power 'just made 320AWKW on 18lbs, full boost at 3800 (of the top of my head) -5's, custom dumps, inlet, pump, injectors, G4 LINK, std cams, std engine'

and my current set up with built engine but r34 bb turbos is making 280rwkw @ 15psi, im thinkn maybe just have my turbos rebuilt and hi flowed this should acheive the 320-340rwkw

  • Replies 949
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

R31Nismoid
R31Nismoid

Gospel huh? Considering im making a lazy 250rwkw @ 12psi with GT-SS, and I know of at least another 10 cars making over 300rwkw (between 300-330rwkw) on 20-22psi… On various dynos to boot (more on th

discoPumpkin
discoPumpkin

Ants is right, lag and no responsiveness should be a crime or atleast punishable under the anti gay laws. It's beyond me why the hell people r so intent on makin there car run like a pig, and if peop

Ants
Ants

The quality of retard bingo in here is heavily retarded.......................to the point that I'm inclined to think this thread has well and truly served its purpose and should be closed. GTR_JOEY

Posted Images

im late Proficient

im late

Posted
Posted
heya bud didnt mean to sound rude if i did, from the info ive gathered i just thought at 20psi it would have been more like 350-360rwkw

this was a previous persons, power 'just made 320AWKW on 18lbs, full boost at 3800 (of the top of my head) -5's, custom dumps, inlet, pump, injectors, G4 LINK, std cams, std engine'

and my current set up with built engine but r34 bb turbos is making 280rwkw @ 15psi, im thinkn maybe just have my turbos rebuilt and hi flowed this should acheive the 320-340rwkw

Nah you didn't come across rude at all. :huh: I was just asking if you had personal experience, thats all.

What might clear ther air is that the dyno I was on is a very old model that is well known in Perth to measure less then I am actually doing. I few of the SAUWA members have reported in the past of running their car at the dyno I was on and a few weeks later running at other dynos around Perth and reporting a bigger figure.

My advanced timing is very conservative compared to other people. Plus also I am running low compression (1.6mm Gasket) So the -5's need to push alot more air to get a decent figure.

I agree that 330RWKW is abit on the low side compared to what others are getting but lets take into account that my motor used to have a T04Z with 6 Boost manifold and 50mm Ext Tial Wastegate and it was pushing 575RWHP with no advanced timing to speak off.

My motor is not the best example of the potential of -5's at 20PSI.

All will change at 24PSI though......... :P

im late Proficient

im late

Posted
Posted
-5's.

Thanks for letting me know.

I assume that you compression is standard?

Mine is much lower (with my 1.6mm gasket)

My motor was built for big PSI so its not the best example for 20PSI -5's :huh:

However once boost is raised then we'll see.

djr81 Grand Master

djr81

Posted
Posted
Thanks for letting me know.

I assume that you compression is standard?

Mine is much lower (with my 1.6mm gasket)

My motor was built for big PSI so its not the best example for 20PSI -5's :huh:

However once boost is raised then we'll see.

My motor just has bolt ons. I guess I am just trying to make the point (Again, I know I'll go away soon) that a -5 will push out numbers in the range of 400-450rwhp on less psi than a -7 or even a -9.

Which is always a bonus if you want to look after the thing. Less compression = less heat.

But to clarify for two same same motors with different turbos and a same rwhp number the BMEP figure for the motors will be very close.

PHA71L Community Regular

PHA71L

Posted
Posted

with cams your power is low because of your 8200 rev limit i would say!

i have stock cams and mine is 8600! still making power at 8500 8600!!!

on just 15 16 psi 400.6 rwhp in 47deg heat would easy go more on a cool day!

i will be re wiring my fuel pump and spit fire coil packs then tuned to 20 22 psi so stayed tuned!

i have 5s to by the way

Mr. Keets Grand Master

Mr. Keets

Posted
Posted
330rwkw for 20psi is an awful lot of boost for that reading from a -5.

My RB26 is within a few rwkw using 15psi.

I was thinking the same thing. Mine makes 320KW at the wheels at 17psi and it's an original build

...Why would you have expected more? Have you had personal experience with GT2860R-5's?...

...We are expecting over 500 All Wheel HP once done.

I will keep you all posted. :P

In my personal experience I just thought their would be more to gain. Yes I do, see above. I would be expecting something around 480whp on a 2.6. Good luck Adam and please post up the future results :huh:

rev210 Grand Master

rev210

Posted
Posted
My motor just has bolt ons. I guess I am just trying to make the point (Again, I know I'll go away soon) that a -5 will push out numbers in the range of 400-450rwhp on less psi than a -7 or even a -9.

Which is always a bonus if you want to look after the thing. Less compression = less heat.

But to clarify for two same same motors with different turbos and a same rwhp number the BMEP figure for the motors will be very close.

I think the maps show that around that range the -5's and -9's are about the same? But, as it gets higher in airflow the -5's excel

Marko R1 Grand Master

Marko R1

Posted
Posted

stock bottom end & now requires a bottom end rebuild (factory gtr bottom end is not engineered to handle this power, it has happened to me twice now)

in terms of rwkw i think you lose 10% in awkw mode, so maybe call it 350rwkw?

paul (dirtgarage, aka gtr wikipedia lol) can confirm this if he happens to read my post

Blitz Grand Master

Blitz

Posted
Posted
yes i thought it was good mph as well nick & a little surprised myself, to be 100% accurate i cracked 129.75mph (130mph would have been nice)

Good work - Offtopic: Who will be building your new bottom end? Pm if you like

im late Proficient

im late

Posted
Posted
I was thinking the same thing. Mine makes 320KW at the wheels at 17psi and it's an original build

In my personal experience I just thought their would be more to gain. Yes I do, see above. I would be expecting something around 480whp on a 2.6. Good luck Adam and please post up the future results :P

Will do :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Haggerty
      RB25DE NEO with Haltech ECU

      By Haggerty · Posted

      Yep, the closest base tune available was for the GTT, I went with that and made all the logical changes I could find to convert it to Naturally Aspirated. It will rev fine in Neutral to redline but it will be cutting nearly 50% fuel the whole way.  If I let it tune the fuel map to start with that much less fuel it wont run right and has a hard time applying corrections.  These 50% cuts are with a fuel map already about half of what the GTT tune had.  I was having a whole lot of bogging when applying any throttle but seem to have fixed that for no load situations with very aggressive transient throttle settings. I made the corrections to my injectors with data I found for them online, FBCJC100 flowing 306cc.  I'll have to look to see if I can find the Cam section. I have the Bosch 4.9 from Haltech. My manifold pressure when watching it live is always in -5.9 psi/inHg
    • brillo
      Leak from Tokico BM50 Brake Master Cylinder

      By brillo · Posted

      Hi My Tokico BM50 Brake master cylinder has a leak from the hole between the two outlets (M10x1) for brake pipes, I have attached a photo. Can anyone tell me what that hole is and what has failed to allow brake fluid to escape from it, I have looked on line and asked questions on UK forums but can not find the answer, if anyone can enlighten me I would be most grateful.
    • MBS206
      Cas issue

      By MBS206 · Posted

      It will be a software setting. I don't believe many on here ever used AEM. And they're now a discontinued product,that's really hard to find any easy answers on. If it were Link or Haltech, someone would be able to just send you a ECU file though.
    • nash47
      Cas issue

      By nash47 · Posted

      Yes sir am asking is there possible way from aem tuner from wiring pins 
    • MBS206
      Cas issue

      By MBS206 · Posted

      Have you checked cam to crank timing and confirmed balancer marks are correct?
×
×
  • Create New...