Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

its all false

infact it even says on the m7 website that is all rubbish and pay no attention to it

http://www.westlinkm7.com.au/news-detail.p...s-Hoax-Email-17

News & Events arrow-green-single.gif Current News Mon, Feb 16th, 2009

Westlink Dismisses Hoax Email

Westlink M7 has dismissed a hoax email currently circulating that claims that the motorway has implemented a secret speed fine based on the time a vehicle enters and exits the motorway.

Rachel Johnson, General Manager of Westlink M7, said that the email was a hoax and that no secret speed enforcement system operates on the Westlink M7.

Westlink supports safe driving and urges all motorists to comply with posted speed limits.

"However, the secret speed fine system detailed in the hoax email does not exist," Ms Johnson said.

"Speed limits are enforced on the Westlink M7 through the normal policing measures that operate on all NSW roads."

"Westlink meets regularly with the NSW Highway Patrol."

Westlink has installed signs that remind motorists that speed cameras are used in NSW.

These are the standard speed camera signs seen on roads across the state and do not mean that any new or secret speed system operates on the Westlink M7.

Edited by Gergless

Oh well, all's well that end's well.

But I'm still the only person I know of (so far) that's been pinged for speeding by police light aircraft when the cops painted white lines across the Great Western Hwy (in the Blue Mtns) back in the early 80s. It was a system based on average speed between 2 consecutive lines.

Anyone remember that???

My car was just a Volvo 245GL lol

Oh well, all's well that end's well.

But I'm still the only person I know of (so far) that's been pinged for speeding by police light aircraft when the cops painted white lines across the Great Western Hwy (in the Blue Mtns) back in the early 80s. It was a system based on average speed between 2 consecutive lines.

Anyone remember that???

My car was just a Volvo 245GL lol

I remember that Terry. Although I wasn't old enough to drive back then :)

They used to have signs up around the Great Western Highway, out towards Bathurst that said "Police Aerial Rader in Use" or something similar. One of them had spray painted under it "cops in Space"... Thought that was pretty funny :)

Well if anyone even remembers the Muppets these days... ;)

doesnt matter if its true or not, only matters when the signs go up and trust me there will be a massive news broadcast and an official launching of the new system. I guess there will be allot more people pulling over for "mobile phone calls" than ever before if they think they were speeding...

doesn't this disrupt the flow of traffic?

Also doesn't this increase the risk of fatal accidents if people are now being forced to pull over or drive very slow if they think they might have been speeding or had forgot for half the journey that they were doing 10km/h over the limmit before they remeberd the stupid new point to point sytem???

people will pull over and people will die in avoidable accidents, i bet you our great leaders havent thought of this??? Or will they make it illegal to to pull over for a phone call now aswell???

Yeah, these rumours about "average speed" cameras are older than dirt. They're not true.

The only such system around in NSW are the Safe-T-Cams, which only pick up trucks on the highway. If anyone's driven down to Melbourne you'll notice that the truckies stick religiously to the speed limit on the Hume until the end of the dual carriageway, and then drive like crazy f**kwits all the way to the border once they're out of the Safe-T-Cams' monitored area.

  • 2 months later...
Yeah, these rumours about "average speed" cameras are older than dirt. They're not true.

The only such system around in NSW are the Safe-T-Cams, which only pick up trucks on the highway. If anyone's driven down to Melbourne you'll notice that the truckies stick religiously to the speed limit on the Hume until the end of the dual carriageway, and then drive like crazy f**kwits all the way to the border once they're out of the Safe-T-Cams' monitored area.

So after the RTA & Police + Roads Minister start to "GUN" for trucks over 20 stretches of road; varying in length from 2Km to 80Km,

Q1...this is revenue raising in the name of safety, right? and...

Q2...the state gov't won't be able to resist booking cars as well right?

Not bothering reading it however Yes and No..

For truckies you have point to point systems however it does not apply for normal drivers. NSW legislation describes how any speed camera must be used in accordance with signage. From memory point to point has more problems than benifits.

Answer from what I know is NO.

On another point I will 100% confirm that stationary SOUND cameras are now in use, In wollongong. As I understand it is still in a test phase... I think

Edited by DECIM8
doesnt matter if its true or not, only matters when the signs go up and trust me there will be a massive news broadcast and an official launching of the new system. I guess there will be allot more people pulling over for "mobile phone calls" than ever before if they think they were speeding...

doesn't this disrupt the flow of traffic?

Also doesn't this increase the risk of fatal accidents if people are now being forced to pull over or drive very slow if they think they might have been speeding or had forgot for half the journey that they were doing 10km/h over the limmit before they remeberd the stupid new point to point sytem???

people will pull over and people will die in avoidable accidents, i bet you our great leaders havent thought of this??? Or will they make it illegal to to pull over for a phone call now aswell???

do you read what you write or does it all just come out and then you press post?

So after the RTA & Police + Roads Minister start to "GUN" for trucks over 20 stretches of road; varying in length from 2Km to 80Km,

Q1...this is revenue raising in the name of safety, right? and...

Q2...the state gov't won't be able to resist booking cars as well right?

re Q1 Tez, how can anything designed to slow a speeding semi down be called revenue raising?

Revenue raising to me is a cop hidden in bushes at the end of a slight downhill, booking a driver doing 65 in a 60 zone. Booking a speeding truck driver who has sped over a number of k's when they know there speed is being monitored is more than justified and completely called for.

It's pretty simple - don't speed you don't get fined.

Before everyone jumps up and down with "oh you've never sped before" lines, yes i have but I'm sure as hell not going to bitch about being caught if I've knowingly broken the law.

How appropriate the speed limits are is a completely different issue. At the moment they are what they are, if you speed and get caught - well, deal with it.

re Q1 Tez, how can anything designed to slow a speeding semi down be called revenue raising?

Revenue raising to me is a cop hidden in bushes at the end of a slight downhill, booking a driver doing 65 in a 60 zone. Booking a speeding truck driver who has sped over a number of k's when they know there speed is being monitored is more than justified and completely called for.

It's pretty simple - don't speed you don't get fined.

Before everyone jumps up and down with "oh you've never sped before" lines, yes i have but I'm sure as hell not going to bitch about being caught if I've knowingly broken the law.

How appropriate the speed limits are is a completely different issue. At the moment they are what they are, if you speed and get caught - well, deal with it.

Q3.

What if a driver has unknowingly broken the law...

A case in point...

Let's say Point to point = 20Km

Throughout that 20Km, a driver between 2.30pm-4pm goes from 50 > 40 > 60 > 40 > 60 > 40 > 80...

If I was that truck driver and got caught 100 metres ahead of where I should have been, I'd be pretty p/ssed off.

I wouldn't be p/ssed off at my inclination to speed...

I'd be p/ssed off at 2X other things

i) my silly inattention to detail (whilst being bit hypoglycemic at around 3pm) and

ii) the system

My solution would not be to reduce RTA Truck stops as they're in the process of doing.

My solution would be to carry out present tests and then some...

eg. extra marijuanha & stimulants (still available on the net from Mexico) testing, twin logs

Point to point is a system that deviant truckies get around already. Truck Stops have already popped up between 2X Points.

If a Point to point is to be effective and fair, it needs to

a) be moveable/malleable/flexible and...

b) random and...

c) latitude for drivers that try to stay on the limit. It's also annoying if drivers stay too far under it.

My 2c

PS. I've been caught Point to point before... IN A CAR.

I paid my fine. I never quibbled. I was caught fair & square.

It was from Lawson to Woodford and the Police were waiting for me (in my Volvo 245GL).

The fixed wing Police aircraft picked me up going from 'white line to white line' at 85Km/Hr in an 80 zone. INATTENTION! THAT'S WHY I WAS P/SSED OFF.

Now, when I think about it, it WAS revenue raising at me. I just hope they got some deviant SPEEDER that day too!

Mate i agree with what you're saying in principal. However in your above example of going through various speeds between two points, if the speed limit in that zone is 60, why would you be travelling 80?

The aim is not to have drivers hit the exact avg speed limit between two points to come in right on 60km/h for example, it is to ensure people don't exceed the set speed limit. I can understand in any speed zone you drop below and sometimes go slightly above, however i stand by point that if you exceed the known speed limit then you should expect to be fined.

I'm not arguing the fairness of the system, just the fact that we all know it's against the law to speed. I do think getting someone for 5k's over the posted limit is revenue raising, no doubt about it. However i also firmly believe that there is no such thing as unknowingly breaking the speed limit. If you're not paying attention, well paying attention is your responsibility.

And as far as point to point goes, if you do not exceed the speed limit you WILL NOT get fined. It's that simple. If a truckie is trying to avg the exact allowable speed by going over the limit because they may have slowed down at some point, i again go back to the fact that they are knowingly breaking the speed limit.

  • 1 year later...

If it is true, the WestLink group (who own the M7) are not owning up to it.

http://www.westlinkm7.com.au/news-detail.p...es-Hoax-Email-4

I think its still a hoax, I have seen this email a while ago and if it has happened I would have been pulled up an fined a while ago.

its all about money. nothing to do with saving lives. speed and red light cameras must have signs warning you. no signs, then dont worry. safEty cameras are not speed cameras.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • And if you want more power, more reliably, and cheaper, go get the Aussie RB... The 4L Barra and put that in instead.
    • No cats will keep discolouring the rear bar. Sends white paint a weird yellow stain. Cut and polish normally gets it out, but you'll be doing that every fortnight I found.
    • Both heads will be equally reliable or unreliable depending on what you do to them.  Stock the RB26 head will flow more. You have access to the stock intake ITB manifold on the RB26 cheaply which flows really well(1000hp+).   Arguably more aftermarket support for RB26, though in Aus we love our RB30 SOHC heads too.    The only downsides to the RB26 head is if you have a VL commodore and want to keep the SOHC look.  Where you may have an issue is drilling out the rb30 block for the bigger head studs but if you are building a big power motor you'd probably put bigger studs on the SOHC head too.  This is just about finding a good machine shop, sometimes easier said than done.  RB30 head worked can make big power just like a Rb26 head, so really it actually more comes down to what your preference is for your car.  People now even making billet versions of both.
    • 2630s work perfectly well. There is something to be said for just using the 30 head, as it saves all the pain of the conversion, still makes tons of power, still sounds cool, etc etc. 2630 will obviously make more power again, but the differences are not stupidly big. It really depends on whether you're racing for sheep stations or not. If it's dead serious, then it's a 26 head. If it's just for fun, it could go either way. But the 26 head and the effort to get it set up, etc etc, is part of the fun.
    • I've been building a 26/30 for a few years now. I've had the head built with all the good stuff. I had a 32 gtr but blew it up and yes its all going into a vl but im looking for some advice from some RB nuts on pros and cons on putting a 26 head on a 30 bottom end is it worth it Works are as follows Head -Extensive porting 1mm oversized supertech valves Supertech double springs Supertech valve guides Supertech titanium retainers Tomei solid lifters Tomei 270 x 10.25 cams Head drain Bottom end series 2 rb30 block Cp ceramic coated pistons Eagle rods Romac balancer Oil restrictions  O ringed blah blah spent a fortune And will get a girdle because the 30s arent used to handling that much rpm Nitto billet oil pump Hypertune plenum 6boost mani Refurbed astra pump thats the cover for it in the boot I did have a precision 6262 but sold it because drag car life. Currently building the ass end full 4 link floater rear end with a 2 speed  But the dilemma i have is my mate rekens I should just stick with the 30 head for reliability. Has any one had any issues with mounting the 26 head ie compression blowing gaskets etc. Just looking for some advice from people who have gone down this route. Here's some photos. Blew the oil pump in the gtr and decided to rip the motor out at the time and do a full build only to find it had been a repairable write off so went down this path.     
×
×
  • Create New...