Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I rang them - It's like hype said :

Stage 1 - $2200

Stage 2 - $2400

Stage 1 for street use - more drivable

Stage 2 for strip use - less drivable (assuming this means more boost comes on later)

Both represent significant gains over standard - Not sure what 'significant' means.

Both sides of the turbo are highflowed using exisiting housings. Ceramic turbine chucked our and replaces with a better one - All bearings replaced.

Not sure, but I saw in another thread that a Hi Flow job coast $1300 - maybe that was just the compressor side ??

I spose when you are talking about a turbo - it's worth paying a bit more to get a professional job. Plus - it's still cheaper than a new/bigger turbo - Plus the look remains stock.

I think the other turbo for 1300 was a thrust bearing and GCG do ball bearing. It would be interesting to see peoples thoughts on which bearing to go for. If it is worth the cost. This could be for two reasons i.e. wear on the bearing, if this is a concern do thrust bearings wear out quicker and how long would they be expected to last ie 15psi. And in theory ball bearing should spool quicker all things equal however has anyone had any lag due to going thrust bearing conversion.

It all comes down to money and in this instance up to a $1000 more for the GCG ball bearing version.

For what its worth...

on most engines thrust bearings are fine if you dont mind the possibly slower boost response.

However i hear that RBs arent renowned for their high oil pressures, and when combined with a thrust bearing turbo running @/over 1 bar have been known to wear thrust bearings, internals pretty quickly.

The higher boost levels and lower than ideal oil pressure force the oil film to disperse allowing metal to metal fouling of the thrust bearing.

Anyway thats the advise ive been given and it seems sound enough from a logic point of view.

Anyone read the article? What did you think? I rang Kyp from ATP and he wouldnt tell me any specs however guaranteed 220rwkw with my setup. They had a car produce 238rwkw. Well priced under 2k including match porting exhaust. Still only bush style bearing.

Anyone had or heard of any experiences with these guys.

Greg.

I picked up a second Hand HKS t04e for $400, and just need an external wastegate, even if it needs a reco that anly costs about 700. The manifold modification is not too hard if you have the right tools, I am macking a steel block that will get welded to the std manifold, and the gate and turbo will bolt to this. You could probably gat something similar made for about $400.

I rang the dude at Port Kembla. He reckons he can do a reco & small hi flow for $800 (keeping the ceramic turbine) But for $1200 he can do a much better job and replace the ceramic turbine.

Might be worth investigating a little more.....

Originally posted by meggala

 

that was my thought the only thing with the hiflow is it bolts straight up. with no mods needed

cheers

meggala

Geez, Garret GTs even HKS turbo's (when got from Nengun) are about that price "NEW". I guess its cheap if a big part of the cost is labour to remove and fit the turbo. Otherwise I'd go buy a new one.

The GT25's are 'bolt on', will make more power and be more reliable.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...