Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Well i've seen alot of people cleaning Rb26 throttle bodies and ending up with high idle problems.

I am prepping the engine to go into the car and was thinking of cleaning the throttle bodies as it would be much easier to do now as the engine is out.

Is there any "safe" method to go about cleaning them without removing the sealant or whatever Nissan put there?

I looked at it today and all i can see is a fine grey line right around where the butterfly sits when it is closed...Is this the seal?

Or should i just leave it as is????

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/267267-rb26-throttle-bodies/
Share on other sites

ive cleaned 2 different sets on 2 different rb26s and never had an issue, sounds like all your doing is cleaning all the built up stuff around the throttle plate which is sealing it 100% and then when u install it with a slight leak around it just needs a slight adjustment of the idle valve to suit, though on both of mine i have never had to touch the idle valve and its perfectly normal.

i would like to see proper proof of this "coating" which is not visable in the slightest when looking at them.

Unless you want the "high idle" problem, leave them alone. You can't see them so they don't need to look "pretty".

agreed, dont clean them, they have a clear coating internally, there is a chance that the cleaning solvent u use may lift this thin lining and "yes" you will have a high idle which you wont be able to get down...

they should be cleaned in a hot spray bath not in solvent... just a tip.

Can they be dipped in hot water with mild soap and cleaned with a soft brush? Will this get off the carbon gunk?

My only concern with this method is them becoming warped.

What do u think?

Are you experiencing a problem you think is related to dirty throttle bodies right now, or are you just getting the urge to clean something? If the later, may a suggest a good coat of wax and some tire shine :down: Seriously though, if there is not currently a problem, I'd leave it be.

also stripped mine and cleaned them while building the engine.. no problems at all

and what clear coating?? theres nothing there.. i used solvents :)

when i say solvent i mean not the acid bath at your local machine shop :P

we use a strong carb cleaning solvent if we dont have access to the hot steam bath (same thing they clean cynlinder heads with)

I suppose its best to point out simply to those who want to clean the TB's that you use something that your sure wont dissovle / attack rubber or plastic.... if unsure stick to carby clean (can version) and a tooth brush.

Edited by URAS
when i say solvent i mean not the acid bath at your local machine shop :P

we use a strong carb cleaning solvent if we dont have access to the hot steam bath (same thing they clean cynlinder heads with)

So could you use a steam cleaner safely on these? or would I be better using some carby cleaner on them? I'm looking at removing the carbon build up around the throttle bodies while I have them off the car at the moment.

  • 5 months later...

ANyone tried this stuff

http://justjap.com/store/product.php?produ...=265&page=4

to summarize

""Tomei throttle coat

Lubrication & Sealing of the Throttle Butterfly

Tomei Throttle Coat will aid with the performance in smooth opening and closing of the butterfly which will increase throttle response. The lubrication properties will also aid by preventing the throttle from sticking and to eliminate rough idling and/or engine stalling. Improved sealing properties and efficient engine operations. ""

have been wondering about this to as reassembling motor soon!

Edited by noone

I've just had to replace all inlet gaskets including throttle body and plenum after nik at allstar garage discovered I had a vacuum leak when they were installing a nistune. He warned me not to alter anything on the linkages or anything that looks like it can be adjusted as they can be a nightmare to re-set. Maybe this is were people are having problems if they adjust something without realizing it.

I thoroughly cleaned mine with carby cleaner when they were off and i've had no problems. In fact the idle is the best its ever been.

  • 1 month later...

looking a Dcieve's post his throttle bodys have a black finish inside

is this the coating everyone is on about???

is it safe to clean the throttle plates and the area they seal against mine appear to have alot of carbon buildup??

thinking just carby cleaner rags toothbrush etc??

Edited by noone

okay would the info in this thread work

is it the same idea as the Tomie stuff I posted above????

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Ni...+throttle++body

my throttle bodys look more like this ie silver bare inner walls only with more carbon build up

than the black inner walls in dcieves pic above

Am starting to worry bout this now

Me car developed an idle hunting problem after a drive through the hunter one day. I remember the accelorator stop fell off and I put the loud pedal all the way down. Could this strectch the accelorator cable or disrupt any other linkages to cause a problem?

ive cleaned 2 different sets on 2 different rb26s and never had an issue, sounds like all your doing is cleaning all the built up stuff around the throttle plate which is sealing it 100% and then when u install it with a slight leak around it just needs a slight adjustment of the idle valve to suit, though on both of mine i have never had to touch the idle valve and its perfectly normal.

i would like to see proper proof of this "coating" which is not visable in the slightest when looking at them.

agreed, we do every engine we build, just make sure not to use anything too agressive.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I agree with everything else, except (and I'm rethinking this as it wasn't setup how my brain first though) if the sensor is at the end of a hose which is how it has been recommended to isolate it from vibrations, then if that line had a small hole in, I could foresee potentially (not a fluid dynamic specialist) the ability for it to see a lower pressure at the sensor. But thinking through, said sensor was in the actual block, HOWEVER it was also the sensor itself that broke, so oil pressure may not have been fully reaching the sensor still. So I'm still in my same theory.   However, I 100% would be saying COOL THE OIL DOWN if it's at 125c. That would be an epic concern of mine.   Im now thinking as you did Brad that the knock detection is likely due to the bearings giving a bit more noise as pressure dropped away. Kinkstah, drop your oil, and get a sample of it (as you're draining it) and send it off for analysis.
    • I myself AM TOTALLY UNPREPARED TO BELIEVE that the load is higher on the track than on the dyno. If it is not happening on the dyno, I cannot see it happening on the track. The difference you are seeing is because it is hot on the track, and I am pretty sure your tuner is not belting the crap out of it on teh dyno when it starts to get hot. The only way that being hot on the track can lead to real ping, that I can think of, is if you are getting more oil (from mist in the inlet tract, or going up past the oil control rings) reducing the effective octane rating of the fuel and causing ping that way. Yeah, nah. Look at this graph which I will helpfully show you zoomed back in. As an engineer, I look at the difference in viscocity at (in your case, 125°C) and say "they're all the same number". Even though those lines are not completely collapsed down onto each other, the oil grades you are talking about (40, 50 and 60) are teh top three lines (150, 220 and 320) and as far as I am concerned, there is not enough difference between them at that temperature to be meaningful. The viscosity of 60 at 125°C is teh same as 40 at 100°C. You should not operate it under high load at high temperature. That is purely because the only way they can achieve their emissions numbers is with thin-arse oil in it, so they have to tell you to put thin oil in it for the street. They know that no-one can drive the car & engine hard enough on the street to reach the operating regime that demands the actual correct oil that the engine needs on the track. And so they tell you to put that oil in for the track. Find a way to get more air into it, or, more likely, out of it. Or add a water spray for when it's hot. Or something.   As to the leak --- a small leak that cannot cause near catastrophic volume loss in a few seconds cannot cause a low pressure condition in the engine. If the leak is large enough to drop oil pressure, then you will only get one or two shots at it before the sump is drained.
    • So..... it's going to be a heater hose or other coolant hose at the rear of the head/plenum. Or it's going to be one of the welch plugs on the back of the motor, which is a motor out thing to fix.
    • The oil pressure sensor for logging, does it happen to be the one that was slowly breaking out of the oil block? If it is,I would be ignoring your logs. You had a leak at the sensor which would mean it can't read accurately. It's a small hole at the sensor, and you had a small hole just before it, meaning you could have lost significant pressure reading.   As for brakes, if it's just fluid getting old, you won't necessarily end up with air sitting in the line. Bleed a shit tonne of fluid through so you effectively replace it and go again. Oh and, pay close attention to the pressure gauge while on track!
    • I don't know it is due to that. It could just be due to load on track being more than a dyno. But it would be nice to rule it out. We're talking a fraction of a second of pulling ~1 degree of timing. So it's not a lot, but I'd rather it be 0... Thicker oil isn't really a "bandaid" if it's oil that is going to run at 125C, is it? It will be thicker at 100 and thus at 125, where the 40 weight may not be as thick as one may like for that use. I already have a big pump that has been ported. They (They in this instance being the guy that built my heads) port them so they flow more at lower RPM but have a bypass spring that I believe is ~70psi. I have seen 70psi of oil pressure up top in the past, before I knew I had this leak. I have a 25 row oil cooler that takes up all the space in the driver side guard. It is interesting that GM themselves recommend 0-30 oil for their Vette applications. Unless you take it to the track where the official word is to put 20-50w oil in there, then take that back out after your track day is done and return to 0-30.
×
×
  • Create New...