Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Well guys what a top day. This is was the first CRD run Dyno Day that I have attended and I was most impressed with how smoothly the event was run.

Thanks must go to Jim and Theo from CRD for kindly offering their facilities for us to use.

Now to the results - look below:

Carlo - R33 GTS-T - 160.2 KW (Up from 139 KW on first run)

Dave - MY99 WRX - 123.7 KW at all four

Benm - R33 GTS-T - 180 KW

Dom - R32 GTS-T - 147.8 KW

JimBo2000 - R33 GTS-T - 198.6 KW

EAV-00L - R33 GTS-T - 170.8 KW

RAIDER - S15 200SX - 177.1 KW

WrxKilla - EVO 4 - 146.4 KW (Not running correctly)

WrxKilla's Mate - Pulsar Gti-R RWD - 164.9 KW

RedGTST - R33 GTS-T - 162.1 KW

Judd - Integra Type R Turbo - 103 KW

David - R32 GTS-T - 167.4 KW

Unknown - WRX Sti - 132.KW

Jarrad - R34 GTT - 163.9 KW

Matt - S14 200SX - 142.5 KW

Joseph - R33 GTS-T - 150.6 KW

CURMAC? - HSV - 200.3 KW

Unknown - Ford XR8 - 206.1 KW

Steve - S15 200SX - 167.3 KW

Unknown - R34 GTT - 140.3 KW

IYI - R33 GTS-T - 253.1 KW

SNG - R32 GTR - 236.6 KW At all four

Top Performers:

Buster - R33 GTS-T (Stock) :( - 324.5 KW

CNG - R33 GTR - 303.7 KW At all four

Merli - R33 GTR - (TBA)

Thankyou to all of you who attended!

Nick

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/26813-crd-dyno-day-review-thread/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 99
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Adjusted Results in car model order:

R32 GTS-T - David - 167.4 KW

R32 GTS-T - Dom - 147.8 KW

-

R32 GTR - SNG - 236.6 KW

-

R33 GTS-T - Buster - 324.5 KW

R33 GTS-T - IYI - 253.1 KW

R33 GTS-T - JimBo2000 - 198.6 KW

R33 GTS-T - Benm - 180 KW

R33 GTS-T - EAV-00L - 170.8 KW

R33 GTS-T - RedGTST - 162.1 KW

R33 GTS-T - Carlo - 160.2 KW

R33 GTS-T - Joseph - 150.6 KW

-

R33 GTR - CNG - 303.7 KW

-

R34 GTT - Jarrad - 163.9 KW

R34 GTT - Unknown - 140.3 KW

-

WRX Sti - Unknown - 132.KW

MY99 WRX - Dave - 123.7 KW

-

S15 200SX - RAIDER - 177.1 KW

S15 200SX - Steve - 167.3 KW

S14 200SX - Matt - 142.5 KW

-

EVO 4 - WrxKilla - 146.4 KW

-

Pulsar Gti-R RWD - WrxKilla's Mate - 164.9 KW

-

Integra Type R Turbo - Judd - 103 KW

-

HSV - CURMAC? - 200.3 KW

-

Ford XR8 - Unknown - 206.1 KW

Originally posted by B-Man

Hey Carlo ! Nice one - tell me how you got extra 21rwkw

Carlo was low on fuel, thought he was putting some ELF into the tank but it was actually the Pepsi cans we were selling for $1ea, top shiat !

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welp, good to know. Will have to wait awhile until steady hands with drills and taps are available. In other news, these just arrived! I will weigh them for posterity.
    • 100% the factory sender is tapered, that is how it seals (well, that and teflon paste or tape)
    • Thanks folks - I've saved a few links and I'll have to think of potential cable/adapters/buying fittings. First step will be seeing if I can turn the curren abortion of a port into something usable, then get all BSPT'y on it. I did attempt to look at the OEM sender male end to see if it IS tapered because as mentioned you should be able to tell by looking at it... well, I don't know if I can. If I had to guess it looks like *maybe* 0.25 of a mm skinnier at the bottom of the thread compared to where the thread starts. So if it is tapered it's pretty slight - Or all the examples of BSPT vs BSPP are exaggerated for effect in their taper size.
    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
×
×
  • Create New...