Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys,

I just got the flow bench test results back for my front facing plenum. This is a custom plemum that bolts on to the standard runners.

Since there had been a bit of a debate over front facing plenums and my engine is being rebuilt, I took the opportunity to get it tested.

I know this is a static test, on a flow bench so it doesn't represent exactly what is happening in the head with valve movement etc - But it's a good start for a bit of empirical analysis.

1 275.4 cfm

2 283.1 cfm

3 307.2 cfm

4 272.4 cfm

5 277.2 cfm

6 298.3 cfm

(1 being front, 6 being rear - Throttle body = XF)

So I am getting a 34.8 cfm difference between 3 & 4 - Which is interesting as one might speculate that most of the flow goes to 5 & 6.

BTW I am no engineer - but 11.3% difference in air flow betwen runners seems a lot to me ??

Has anyone got any comparative bench flow tests for standard or GReddy/Trust plenums ?

Now I gotta decide what I am going to do about this -

a) Try and fix the current plenum (a bit hit & miss)

B) Replace with standard plenum

c) Replace with after market (Trust/GReddy)

d) Just keep in and richen it up a bit

Opinions and feedback welcomed folks. Keep in nice though OK ?

Cheers,

  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Any pics of the internals?

On an RB25 if you remove the top half of the plenum, are all the lower runners the same length?

On an RB20 the runners are only the same length when top & bottom halves of plenum are bolted together.

Ie say runner no.1's top sectoin equates to say 50% of its length and so does the bottom section. On runner no.6 though top section equates to 65% of runner length, and bottom equates for the remaining 35% of length (rough numbers only).

So if you only use the bottom section of the plenum then some runners are shortened by 50% others by 65%... making sense?

Roy - by sight, they all look the same length.

Anyone got a standard plenum (the top bit only, not runners and all) and I will get it tested for a side by side comparison. Can use my runners etc - The test wasn't that much, so I'd be happy to pay for it , if someone donates the standard plenum....... I might even buy it off you , if the results are good !

Cheers,

sidewaymambo & B-Man, that would be excellent to do a flow test in the same way on the standard plenum. As we know, a number of guys have problems with no 1 and no 6 cylinders (possibly due to fuel reasons as well) but to have the baseline flow data would be excellent.

grepin, if you read this you should invest in flow testing your Greddy plenum whilst it is still off the motor.

Originally posted by Freebaggin

sidewaymambo & B-Man, that would be excellent to do a flow test in the same way on the standard plenum.  As we know, a number of guys have problems with no 1 and no 6 cylinders (possibly due to fuel reasons as well) but to have the baseline flow data would be excellent.

grepin, if you read this you should invest in flow testing your Greddy plenum whilst it is still off the motor.

That's exactly what I am thinking..if someone can lend it for test..I wish ..

Sidewaymambo & I have just spoken and I'll pick up his standard plenum on the weekend -

So I'll get the same people to do the bench flow test on it and then post the results back !

Thanks Phillip !

Good stuff ! :rofl:

B-Man when you pick up the plenum dont be tempted to look under the bonnet of sidewaymambo's car...mmm very strong is the power of the darkside (in my best yoda voice):(

...and great work for the trouble your going to, a case of Crownies for the man!

No way man ! I'll look after it - I promise !

Does someone want to donate a GReddy Plenum ? And I'll get that flowed at the same time .. . . I promise I won't put it on my car and give you back my old one.... he he he joking !

But yeah, I am serious about flow testing a GReddy if someone else is willing to help.

Hi B-man it is good to have someone confirm our on car results. But be careful, how a manifold reacts (flows) under vacuum (ie; on the flow bench) is very different to how it flows under boost. Did you do it at 1 bar or 2 bar vacuum? We find head flowing for a turbo engine gives more boost friendly results at 2 bar vacuum.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Sounds like the rack seals blew.
    • ^ This is all good advice. I can imagine that there's some passive components in the HVAC controller that run that PWM output that could die, or suffer bad solder joints. It can be worth opening it up, taking a schmooze around looking for swollen electro caps, evidence of liquid escape anywhere, tracks that have been hot, lifted, cracked, etc. A DMM might not be suitable for seeing if the PWM output is pulsing. Might be too fast and too low voltage for a DMM to keep up. An analogue voltmeter might give a better hope. I use a handheld oscilloscope (<$100 from Aliexpress if you want something cheap). A DMM might see the voltage across the motor flicker. Otherwise, as above. If you can successfully see PWM action, then the control side should be good. If you can't see it with what you have, you might need to step up the instrumentation used, as above. Beyond that, and dbm7's advice on testing the motor directly, you're down to looking for broken wires, corroded connector pins, etc.
    • So Thanks for the comments etc. To follow up on this, we went down the path of fitting a divider down the middle of the external pipe that was added to the exhaust manifold and the divider went from very close to the external wastegate all the way up to the "V" part where the pipes from each side of the manifold joined. After this modification it was finally in a position to do the dyno-tune with some degree of success. Top end power was down about 10kw (250rwkw down to 240rwkw) I believe from previous but it seems to be more responsive lower down and at least it is now driveable and fun and back on the road to be enjoyed. Apparently the timing couldn't be run the same as it was running into knock and boost was down about 1psi. For all we know this could have been from the fuel being a bit older, or perhaps some slight complication from the new head gasket as we didn't have compression figures from before that mod to compare. I'm no mechanic and this is second hand info but I just wanted to follow-up to those that commented or read the original post with interest. After so many months of stuffing around this is a big win. The interesting part was most of the info around this was gained from information around Barra motors and not GTR as the manifold setup on the Barra with single turbo was more similar.  Thanks for those that helped with info. Regards Rob 
    • G'day ... first up, I very much doubt that's a resistor network (as used also for this job), but the part# looks right. The description of 'power module assembly' looks to be nissanese for 'PWM driven, ground switched, DC motor speed controller'.... the circuit in the schematic kinda infers that's the case... ...with the transistor symbol appearing in the unit described here as 'Fan Control Amp(lifier)'....being driven by pin20 on the HVAC unit,  and a feedback signal on pin19 from the motor negative terminal for some reason (might be motor fault detection, maybe they detect commutator switching to determine motor revs as well, I dunno)... but if they are  counting commutator spikes, a bad segment (or really worn brushes) will throw a spanner in the works... The motor itself will as said be brushed DC with segmented commutator, rated at 12VDC nominally ~ now-a-days I just unplug them, determine the positive wire, and hook them up to a variable power supply and find out how much current they draw, if they work etc etc ...you can also check for bad segments...ie; set the power supply up to feed 1volt @ 2amp max, then watch the wattage count as you slowly rotate the fan blower motor through a complete revolution ; any bad/dead segments will be clearly evident...some folks would just say determine the positive wire, and feed it battery voltage, and if fan spin, you've got a win...<grin>... well, at least that infers it should do something when plugged back in, and the HVAC unit commands it to run... and if it doesn't, you suspect the module, but you should check the PWM signal on pin20 is actually present, and if it is, blame the module ...  
    • Ah. OK. I take it back. I hadn't looked closely at the R33/4 arms and presumed that GKTech did as GKTech do everywhere else, which is to use sphericals there. The poly bushings are made to be 100% interchangeable, should use the standard bolt just fine. Every other bush in every other place in pretty much every other car, does.
×
×
  • Create New...