Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Mine supposedly has 270bhp at the wheels. Jacky's S15 290bhp at the wheels. My horses sound lazy compared to his. lol But his times make my head hurt. I've been to EC so I know how fast 1:45 is! And that's on Federal RSRs! unbelieveable

Might be worthwhile doing a wheel/tyre swap for a session? He's punting his this around very quickly! Callum's is pretty close to yours on "spec" isn't it Harry?

he's 4 stud, so we can't swap rubber. I have been offered me a try before you buy deal though :ermm:

His is also stripped out, some basic aero - wing and undertray/splitter. It went a sec faster from them alone. Lower diff ratio (like I had in the old car) and a mech diff. I have none of those things.

I ran one day in a Scirroco at Nurburgring with some Bridgestone street tyre, then the next day on those Federal 595 RS-R, they are a very good tyre. I dont think they give away much at all to an RE55, which appear to be showing their age compared to the newer A050.

But, the RS-R was an amazing thing...its is a true semi... so that experience combined with the times at EC and Wakefield of the E85 sniffing S15...then they are on par with RE55s in my eyes. At least close enough that it would be interesting to back to back them as the differences are not obvious

I ran one day in a Scirroco at Nurburgring with some Bridgestone street tyre, then the next day on those Federal 595 RS-R, they are a very good tyre. I dont think they give away much at all to an RE55, which appear to be showing their age compared to the newer A050.

But, the RS-R was an amazing thing...its is a true semi... so that experience combined with the times at EC and Wakefield of the E85 sniffing S15...then they are on par with RE55s in my eyes. At least close enough that it would be interesting to back to back them as the differences are not obvious

The new Federal semi FZ-201 in medium compound is about 1.5 sec faster than RS-R's :ermm:

I ran one day in a Scirroco at Nurburgring with some Bridgestone street tyre, then the next day on those Federal 595 RS-R, they are a very good tyre. I dont think they give away much at all to an RE55, which appear to be showing their age compared to the newer A050.

But, the RS-R was an amazing thing...its is a true semi... so that experience combined with the times at EC and Wakefield of the E85 sniffing S15...then they are on par with RE55s in my eyes. At least close enough that it would be interesting to back to back them as the differences are not obvious

With a hardness rating of 140 it falls short of some of the true semi's Roy.

It is the best all round (street/track) tyre I have ever used but it is at least 1 & 1/2 seconds slower than the direzza,s I replaced them with.

So the new Federal semi is widely available now?

I was enquiring about them a few months back and they were nowhere to be found.

no. 255 x 17 is still the biggest they are importing atm.

They only have a couple or so of sizes available.

With a hardness rating of 140 it falls short of some of the true semi's Roy.

It is the best all round (street/track) tyre I have ever used but it is at least 1 & 1/2 seconds slower than the direzza,s I replaced them with.

140, 50 or 230....dont care. They are a good tyre and only a guide. There is more to grip then a number or how soft they are. They work well. And if you have used them back to back with RE55s and they are 1.5seconds slower then i fair enough. But i would be surprised if that was the case

140, 50 or 230....dont care. They are a good tyre and only a guide. There is more to grip then a number or how soft they are. They work well. And if you have used them back to back with RE55s and they are 1.5seconds slower then i fair enough. But i would be surprised if that was the case

Not arguing as to wether they are good or not Roy. A great tyre. My quoted times were actual time differences I ran from one track day to the next.

The rsr's were amazing compared to the street rubber i used prior but the dunlops semi's took grip to a whole nutha level.

140, 50 or 230....dont care. They are a good tyre and only a guide. There is more to grip then a number or how soft they are. They work well. And if you have used them back to back with RE55s and they are 1.5seconds slower then i fair enough. But i would be surprised if that was the case

I almost have, i used to have 595 rs's on the skyline for street tyres and re55's for track. There was a couple of seconds in it around wakefield on the same day. Don't know that there is a significant difference between the old rs and the new rsr.

I almost have, i used to have 595 rs's on the skyline for street tyres and re55's for track. There was a couple of seconds in it around wakefield on the same day. Don't know that there is a significant difference between the old rs and the new rsr.

Buger all that I could tell Dave, Maybe a 10th or so at best.

Have a hard think... the only difference was tyres? If so then I seems i am selling the RE55s short :) That is dramatic and i wouldnt have thought it would be that dramatic. But a back to back is more accurate then my seat of pants! They were the 595RSR, not the 595, or the 595 EVO etc etc (just checking)

http://www.federaltyres.com.au/ss595

Edited by Roy
Have a hard think... the only difference was tyres? If so then I seems i am selling the RE55s short :) That is dramatic and i wouldnt have thought it would be that dramatic. But a back to back is more accurate then my seat of pants! They were the 595RSR, not the 595, or the 595 EVO etc etc (just checking)

http://www.federaltyres.com.au/ss595

Definitely the RSR Roy, I have been a big fan of them as a street/track combo tyre for a long time but as a track only tyre they fall short of the dedicated semi's.

Probably the reason why federal are in the process of introducing the new semi as used by callum earlier in this thread.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • That's kind of what I was getting at saying you'd be here soon regarding length etc being able to add additional restriction.  My assumption (possible donkeys of you and mption) is that the length of hose to an oil cooler, and back, isn't going to be that huge of a loss. Typically you're talking about 1.5m of total length. And so far everyone in our world hasn't had issues with oil not being able to get to a cooler and back, it's more been, how the heck do we get the oil out of the head and back down to the bottom? I'd nearly hazard a guess the biggest issue people have with oil cooling and oil supply, is being able to get the heat out at the cooler itself (not enough air flow, too small of a cooler etc) Also, when people mount them wrong and make really awesome air traps so they've dramatically diminished the cooling capacity.
    • I will rebutt this and the preceding point from Dose....but without doing any calcs to demonstrate anything and without knowing that I am right or wrong. But... The flow capacity of a fluid transfer system is not limited by the smallest orifice or section of conduit in that system, unless it is drastically smaller than the rest of the system. OK, I use the word drastically perhaps with too much emphasis, but let's drill down on what I really mean. The flow capacity of the system is the result of the sum of the restrictions of the entire system. So, to make an extreme example, if you have a network with 3" pipe everywhere (and let's say a total length of only a few metres) and that 12mm ID restriction of the oil filter connection being the obvious restriction, then for any given amount of pressure available, the vast majority of all the pressure drop in the system is going to occur in the 12mm restriction. But.... increase the length of the 3" pipeline to, say 1000m, and suddenly the pipe pressure loss will likely add up to either be in the same order of magnitude, possibly even exceeding that of the 12mm restriction. Now the 12mm restriction starts to matter less. Translate this to the actual engine, actual oil cooler hose sizing, etc etc, and perhaps: The pressure loss caused by flowing through the narrow section (being the 12mm oil filter port, and perhaps any internal engine oil flow pathways associated with it) is a certain number. The pressure loss through, say, -12 hoses out to the cooler and back is negligible, but The pressure loss through -10 hoses out to the cooler, at the exact same length as the above, starts to become a decent fraction of the loss through the 12mm stuff at the filter port. Maybe even it starts to exceed it. I could actually do these calcs if I knew 1) how much oil was actually flowing in the line, 2) gave enough of a f**k to do things that I hate doing for work, voluntarily for a hypothetical discussion. Anyway - I reiterate. It's not the narrowest port that necessarily determines how much it can all flow. It is the sum. A long enough length of seemingly fat enough pipe can still cause more loss than a semmingly dominant small bore restriction.
    • To pick up what Dose is putting down. Not a lot of point running a huge hose if the motor is still restricted to the smaller size... It's only capable of flowing so much at that point...   *Waits for GTSBoy to come in and bring in the technicalities of length of pipe, and additional restriction from wall friction etc etc*
    • Hooley Dooley these things have some history! If i sell them they will need a certificate of providence to prove they have been in the hands of verified RB20 royalty! They have been stored in a plastic tub, away from sunlight and moisture. They are in mint condition. And they will stay that way, as i have sprung the money for a set of shockworks coilovers. I'm just working on getting them in at the moment, after rebushing the rear of the car, and while the subframe was out i welded in the GKtech reinforcement bracing as well.  They will get a workout at Ararat King of The Hill in November. I ran 48s on the short course there a few months ago, and i am hoping with new bushes and shocks in the rear i can launch a bit harder. There was a fair bit of axle tramp when i tried too hard off the line. a few of the corners had dips mid way which also made the car feel a bit unsettled, hopefully this will help there too.   
    • Food for thought, the stock oil filter thread is a 3/4-16 UNF, which has an ID of about 10 to 12mm (according to ChatGPT lol). Now compare than to an 10AN, which has an ID of about 14mm (Raceworks is 14.2mm, Speed flow is 14.27mm).  
×
×
  • Create New...