Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey fellas,

This begs the question, are old and worn intercoolers better? I noticed that some top-notch street machines, e.g. R33 GTR's out there have thousands of dollars spent on their engine exterior etc, but they're intercoolers are just simply rat-shit looking...by that I mean, they look all black, worn out and ready to cark it - but yet they're still kept on the car. This makes me curious if whether worn intercoolers are actually better for airflow etc - I mean, come on, good intercooler kits cost under $2K, surely if someone's gone out and spent $30K on their car, surely they can afford a new frontmounted intercooler? So there must be more too it?

Any answers??

"oh no , my intercooler "looks " worn out i better buy a new one " how stupid does that sound .

arn't you only allowed one intake mod in certain places in australia

who wants a massive shiny intercooler stickin out that screams "look at me "

the gtr ones acctually work quite well

if it aint broke dont fix it

what exactly happens when an intercooler "carks it" does it collapse or blow up or something?

hey bit offtopic but talkin bout old ic im jst wondering if i should have my intercooler cleaned on the inside; degreaser flushed through? reason i ask is cause in my uni labs we use autoclaves to sterilise and we must take into account temp vs time when fats are involved.

hey bit offtopic but talkin bout old ic im jst wondering if i should have my intercooler cleaned on the inside; degreaser flushed through? reason i ask is cause in my uni labs we use autoclaves to sterilise and we must take into account temp vs time when fats are involved.

50/50 kero/metho. fill, shake (block the inlets of course) empty. repeat until it runs out clear. flush with water and let dry. done

50/50 kero/metho. fill, shake (block the inlets of course) empty. repeat until it runs out clear. flush with water and let dry. done

madz, thanks for the recipe :-P

where can u buy kerosine from; bunnings perhaps?

I never thought you would have to replace an intercooler unless the fins were all munted.... :laugh:

lol yes Bunnings or any hardware shop is a good place to start. And does anyone actually bother to clean their intercoolers?

;)

Yeah i wouldn't think it would be worth cleaning out. Oil is a good heat conductor anyway so would think an oily cooler would be such a bad thing(tho not that good). If its a good effeceint cooler there would be many reasons to change it. most coolers look very second hand quite quickly anyway eg filling with bugs stone dents branches pedestrians, whatever. I thought paint or powdercoatings would be more an insulator than anything hence why they usually come unpainted. because the idea is that you are trying get the heat out not keep it in. maybe only a minor insulator i haven't tested it myself.

I would recomend cleaning intercoolers every now and then. I took mine out after a track day and found it was coated with oil on the inside due to the factory oil breather system.

post-51334-1244292522_thumb.jpg

Yeah i wouldn't think it would be worth cleaning out. Oil is a good heat conductor anyway so would think an oily cooler would be such a bad thing(tho not that good). If its a good effeceint cooler there would be many reasons to change it. most coolers look very second hand quite quickly anyway eg filling with bugs stone dents branches pedestrians, whatever. I thought paint or powdercoatings would be more an insulator than anything hence why they usually come unpainted. because the idea is that you are trying get the heat out not keep it in. maybe only a minor insulator i haven't tested it myself.

oil insulates. why do you think fat people are warmer?

Inter coolers are painted black from factory for thermal efficiency ...

matte Black is able to dissipate heat far better than any unpainted alloy surface

Sounds funny I know but research it

^^ From memory the R34 GTR V-Spec II Nur's Front mount intercoolers came in an unpainted alloy surface...

was jst looking at mine last night and its not black, sorta a coarse brushed alluminium

In my experience unless you are getting the intercooler very cheap, you would be better off with a new one.

I have had intercoolers where you just dont seem to be getting the air cold enough.

IDK maybe I just like the feel of putting new stuff into my imports.

Inter coolers are painted black from factory for thermal efficiency ...

matte Black is able to dissipate heat far better than any unpainted alloy surface

Sounds funny I know but research it

My new one is painted with a super thin coat of cheap (that is more solvent than actual paint) high gloss black, do you reckon the thermal efficiency would be negatively affected?

Hey fellas,

This begs the question, are old and worn intercoolers better? I noticed that some top-notch street machines, e.g. R33 GTR's out there have thousands of dollars spent on their engine exterior etc, but they're intercoolers are just simply rat-shit looking...by that I mean, they look all black, worn out and ready to cark it - but yet they're still kept on the car. This makes me curious if whether worn intercoolers are actually better for airflow etc - I mean, come on, good intercooler kits cost under $2K, surely if someone's gone out and spent $30K on their car, surely they can afford a new frontmounted intercooler? So there must be more too it?

Any answers??

no, a worn in intercooler is no better than a new one. and a top shelf intercooler costs a fair whack more than $2K, but having said that $2K will certainly get a damn good one.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...