Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 81
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Troy, I think the plan is to have a couple different stages of modification. The will be bolt-on internal gated turbos to fit stock manifold as the base stage, all the way up to custom manifold, extrenal gated turbo with full management.

Hi guys, in case you missed it in other threads, they are unning 50 psi fuel pressure at idle with a rising rate fuel pressure regulator. So to achieve this sort of result, the injectors are exceeding their rated output by around 40%.

My previous experiences with "overdriving" injectors more than 10% has not been very good. The solenoids and springs simply don't like it. Take the risk if you wish.

Secondly the car is not driven everyday at 431.6 rhhp. I believe GTS-t Vspec quoted 360 rwhp which is under the widely accepted 450 bhp maximum for daily use on a standard internals RB25.

Hope that clarifies

I have been driving it with the 431rwhp over the past couple days, and I must say it's a heap of fun, but in order to save my stock internals I feel that the 360rwhp is a much safer level for the engine until I get forged pistons etc.

If I do have any trouble with running the stock injectors at high pressure then I'll let you all know, but so far they've performed admirably:D

nice numbers paul

I got a 0.70 a/r front with t66 comp wheel and 0.82 a/r rear rated at 600hp turbo going on my car at the end of this week, i got the same manifold as you but 550cc injectors and a power fc with 044 bosch pump. Should i expect the same numbers as u? As i was told it would need atleast 20psi to get 300rwkw..

Interesting. I've run out on injectors on my car now @ 203rwkw (what is that in HP?)

Admittadly im not running a rising rate reg, but i surely wont be getting another 100rwkw out of just raising the pressure.

Also im running a Factory ECU with a chip that really hasnt had it's map changed at all.

Just speed limiter removed at this stage.

Now, i dont think my car is making anywhere near 400rwhp (im not sure of the conversion)

And my car to date has come home with 12.98 @ 108mph.

Paul... did you run the mid 13 @ 411rwhp?

If so... that's awefully low MPH for that kind of power... (if 400rwhp is more than 200rwkw)

As if you get wheelspin or not, your MPH is usually more or less the same. Just your ET that changes.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, sort of blurring two different things together, aren't we? I just meant O2 feedback closed loop. I used to have a 0-1V LCD meter on my dash, wired directly to the O2 sensor signal. So you could easily see what it was doing. Normal running it would flick back and forth nicely. Slow down to an idle and it would keep flicking, as the ECU tried to servo to maintain stoich, but it would slow down as each swing happened until it would stay at one end of the scale. As I said above, the sensor heater is not enough to keep it hot enough when there is also little heat in the exhaust flow. Give it a blip and it would start swinging again, then peter out again. Meanwhile, idle speed control would run just fine, because unrelated.
    • It's not even O2 feedback, it's just simply when the ECU sees the closed TPS signal for whatever reason the idle will start steadily dropping until the engine dies. With the TPS adjusted to not trigger closed TPS it will idle at some ridiculously high RPM and something like 6 degrees of timing. In the absence of getting eyes on it personally and a lot of quality time doing diagnostics I couldn't tell you what the real problem was but it was interesting nonetheless
    • Oof. One of my mates has an R34 GT-R that he initially was a "I want to go twins for response and convenience" on his stock 2.6 with Kelford 272 cams, but his friends are pests and were always in his ear about their place being in the bin.   Eventually one of the 2860-5s decided to add it's own input and force his hand, so he conceded and went for a Pulsar 6262G ("G35 900") with T4 0.85 hotside.    Here's an overlay of the results, same cams, same stock bottom end, same boost, same fuel, just from a pretty tidy 2860-5 install to a Pulsar turbo on a 6boost maniifold on BP98.   Worth mentioning here, it may seem like a dead horse thing but the dyno plot doesn't tell the story of how much better it is to drive - transient response has completely changed the car, he used to have flat foot shifting to stop it having to wind up again on gear changes even at >7000rpm... now it builds boost faster than that even short shifting.   It's 100% transformed the car before you even consider how much better it holds on: Pulsar and Garrett aren't the same, but from our experience if you're just looking for a better drive and the ability to make the same or more power I think the divided G30 770 would probably be the smallest I'd go to.
    • Great work Duncan, any events local you will give it a test once all done? 
×
×
  • Create New...