Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I guess I have more right foot control than most people :bunny:

Though I might also admit that 110km or so was coming back from Brisbane then I did another 320km round trip to somewhere in logan so there is a shitload of highway driving in that :rolleyes: Almost all my usage in it will be highway driving (to logan and back). Once I hit the start of the mountain roads though I swear I can almost see my fuel gauge moving.

  • Replies 112
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

First tank of fuel in my Stagea and I've just hit 530km on the tank (which incidently only required 69L and was right on empty) and I'm about half way between empty and the quarter mark so I think I'll easily manage 600km on the first tank.

the last quarter does go by much quicker...

Somewhere on this forum is the litres used at each mark on the guage, as per the manual.

Basically from full, the first quarter you use will be about 17L, then the next measures about 18L, then say another 18L but the last quarter is only about 10 or something. The numbers are slightly different to what I've got here but basically you should go furthest on the 2nd and 3rd quarters according to the guage.

I'm not sure why the guage is designed the way it is, with the last quarter measuring just over half of what the other 3 measure, but thats how it is. So if you think the last quarter always seems to go quickly, its because it does.

its not the gauge, its the shape of the tank, it tapers towards the bottom and has less volume in the lower 1/4 of the tank. its to stop te fuel sloshing around a big open area when youre low so the fuel pump always picksup fuel.

I just spent 5 days driving a new VW Jetta turbo diesel and whilst it was a nice car to drive and economy was unbelievable (5.5l/100km on the high way and 940km on a 60L tank). I can not say I enjoyed driving it, even with the DSG gear box (it changes the wrong way in manual, DOH) it did not feel like a great car the drive. Even going up Tamborine mountain it was just another car.

I got back into my car last night at the airport and so nice to have all that power under the right foot. It does not feel so slow off the mark now and is so easy to get to the posted spped limit. The steering was also lighter and I noticed that in the M35 (leather) you sit up on the seat a little more.

But I LOVE IT, Fuel consumption and all.

Cheers

Andy

Try driving a 1991 Mazda 121 for 2 weeks while a custom radiator is being made up for your M35.

There is no bananaman large enough to express how much I appreciated my car when I got back in it.

30ignis_m_m.jpg

i drive that every day, when i get into my Stagea on the weekend. its a different world.

though the ignis is not a rocket, it gets the job done and gets it done smoothly.

...I can not say I enjoyed driving it, even with the DSG gear box (it changes the wrong way in manual, DOH) it did not feel like a great car the drive. Even going up Tamborine mountain it was just another car.

...

I reckon the dsg was half the problem. I hate those things and every car I've driven with that style box has sucked a*#. Manual in a diesel is so much better. In fact my diesel x-trail has so much torque it's quite enjoyable to give it a boot. Not Stagea style but still kicks butt for an SUV.

I picked up someone at the airport the other day and the flight was delayed over an hour. Went out to the carpark and watched TV until I heard the plane land, then had a ball driving home and showing off the "sleeper" wagon.

Ahhh, that's stagea living.

Back on topic, last fillup 14.3 litres/100

Back on topic, last fillup 14.3 litres/100

That looks better although I recon you should be able to get a little better on ACT roads and that 5 minute peak hour, oh I'm sorry, that peak hour goes for more like 15 minutes these days, hehehe.

My fill tonight was 14.25litres/100 or 7km/L

Cheers

Andy

Try driving a 1991 Mazda 121 for 2 weeks while a custom radiator is being made up for your M35.

There is no bananaman large enough to express how much I appreciated my car when I got back in it.

Ha! I drive a VZ wagon every day, and the C34 feels like it's 10 years younger than the Commodore - not the other way around...

With the ECUTalk computer fitted, both instantaneous & trip-average consumption is displayed and it's amazing how much it varies during a commute.

I drove from one end of Adelaide to the other (Outer Harbour to Noarlunga) late Saturday night, and averaged just over 11L/100km. But if I drive a 15km trip is daytime traffic, it will average more like 15L/100. I don't even want to talk about how high it reads when going up a slight incline...

I haven't really checked for certain, but I've got a hunch that the car uses slightly less fuel when you accelerate from a standstill using some boost - it's running a higher VE and spending less time under throttle than if you 'baby' it up to speed.

(and it feels muuuch better!)

:D

True, but IDGAF about economy in the dunnydore - it's a state fleet car and I'm just happy if it continues to function...

:)

It looks like I'll be getting a Captiva TD sometime later this year, hopefully it's a nicer drive, but it is a GM Daewoo so I'm not holding my breath!

I had a Daewoo as my first car. Nfi what went wrong but I took it rallying, had to get it towed from the same spot 3 weeks in a row. 3rd week = write off.

My Falcon gets pretty decent economy on LPG. Around 500km to a tank depending on where I go but since all my highway travel will be done in the stagea now I expect that to drop to 450 or so, costs $30-35 to fill up.

  • 3 weeks later...

Kk, done a proper test now.

Filled car completely, reset odo, when the light came on I refilled and recorded both the odo & how much fuel I put in.

I put in exactly 61L (light turns on when I still have 19L left, odd) - odo read 547km.

Result: 11.15/100km.

I guess this is better than most people get, I rarely put my foot down tho.

Kk, done a proper test now.

Filled car completely, reset odo, when the light came on I refilled and recorded both the odo & how much fuel I put in.

I put in exactly 61L (light turns on when I still have 19L left, odd) - odo read 547km.

Result: 11.15/100km.

I guess this is better than most people get, I rarely put my foot down tho.

Yeah, that's about what I am getting at the moment with city driving and giving it a bit of stick here and there (gotta test if the CAI makes a difference... over and over and over :D )

I got around 8.5-8.8km/L on the trip to the snow on the weekend and that included some really fun driving coming back from Mt Selwyn. 25km of winding roads up and down a valley around the Tumut dam. Then off on another 120km of back roads with logging trucks doing 115km/h so over taking was fun.

I then filled at Goulburn, set the cruise on 120km/h and got 11.4km/L back into Sydney. Got to love that.

But it is going down fast now driving in Sydney traffic again.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I thought that might be the case, thats what I'll start saving for. Thanks for the info 
    • Ps i found the below forum and it seems to be the same scenario Im dealing with. Going to check my ECU coolant temp wire tomorrow    From NICOclub forum: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Thu Apr 11, 2013 7:23 am I am completely lost on this. Car ran perfectly fine when I parked it at the end of the year. I took the engine out and painted the engine bay, and put a fuel cell with an inline walbro 255 instead of the in tank unit I had last year. After reinstalling everything, the engine floods when the fuel pump primes. if i pull the fuel pump fuse it'll start, and as soon as I put the fuse back in it starts running ridiculously rich. I checked the tps voltage, and its fine. Cleaned the maf as it had some dust from sitting on a shelf all winter, fuel pressure is correct while running, but wont fire until there is less than 5psi in the lines. The fuel lines are run correctly. I have found a few threads with the same problem but no actual explanation of what fixed it, the threads just ended. Any help would be appreciated. Rb25det s1 walbro255 fuel pump nismo fpr holset hx35 turbo fmic 3" exhaust freddy intake manifold q45tb q45 maf   Re: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Fri Apr 12, 2013 5:07 am No, I didn't. I found the problem though. There was a break in one of the ecu coolant temp sensor wires. Once it was repaired it fired right up with no problems. I would have never thought a non working coolant temp sensor would have caused such an issue.
    • Hi sorry late reply I didnt get a chance to take any pics (my mechanics on the other side of the city) but the plugs were fouled from being too rich. I noticed the MAF wasn't genuine, so I replaced it with a genuine green label unit. I also swapped in a different ignitor, but the issue remains. I've narrowed it down a bit now: - If I unplug and reconnect the fuel lines and install fresh spark plugs, the car starts right up and runs perfectly. Took it around the block with no issues - As soon as I shut it off and try to restart, it won't start again - Fuel pressure while cranking is steady around 40 psi, injectors have good spray, return line is clear, and the FPR vacuum is working. It just seems like it's getting flooded after the first start I unplugged coolant sensors to see if its related to ECU flooding but that didnt make a difference. Im thinking its related to this because this issue only started happening after fixing coolant leaks and replacing the bottom part of the stock manifolds coolant pipe. My mechanic took off the inlet to get to get to do these repairs. My mechanics actually just an old mate who's retired now so ill be taking it to a different mechanic who i know has exp with RBs to see if they find anything. If you have any ideas please send em lll give it a try. Ive tried other things like swapping the injectors, fuel rail, different fuel pressure regs, different ignitor, spark plugs, comp test and MAF but the same issue persists.
    • My return flow is custom and puts the return behind the reo, instead of at the bottom. All my core is in the air flow, rather than losing some of it up behind the reo. I realise that the core really acts more as a spiky heatsink than as a constant rate heat exchanger, and that therefore size is important.... but mine fits everything I needed and wanted without having to cut anything, and that's worth something too. And there won't be a hot patch of core up behind the reo after every hit, releasing heat back into the intake air.
    • There is a really fun solution to this problem, buy a Haltech (or ECU of your choice) and put the MAF in the bin.  I'm assuming your going to want more power in future, so you'll need to get the ECU at some stage. I'd put the new MAF money towards the new ECU. 
×
×
  • Create New...