Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Was going to post this in the forced induction section, but I doubt "story telling" will be favoured by the mod's.

Car's been off the road for the good part of a year (September).

Built motor (standard capacity), .84 t04z & fair bit of weight-loss .. looking for 400+ kw.

Yet to score a ride in a t04z powered R, or anything single turbo'd to match (been in a t88).

So if any owner's want to share their experience's..

How it feels, adrenaline factor, how it come's on etc etc.... Just trying to butter myself up for the future.. Shouldn't be much more then a month away.. Great deal of time, money & sleep less nights involved during the build up... Hope it lives up to my expectations ;):thumbsup: :thumbsup: me up..

Tomek

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bRR_aisRgPI...feature=related

Edited by Tomek
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/274597-t04z-like/
Share on other sites

TO4Z does feel quick when they come on. The rush is very cool.

With that said, for a car that does anything other than circuits with a lot of flowing corners, i think you'll find the GT35R or twins a better matched setup for stock capacity :P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/274597-t04z-like/#findComment-4655808
Share on other sites

Yeah i know its been done to death, he's trying to revive it it seems :P

Tomek; The T04Z is a great turbo, feels very strong when hard on, and has no problem turning tyres hard or netting a big number on a dyno. Ive given a quite fast GTR (t04z, rb26) a good hard drive on multiple occasions, road, twisty hills etc - in the twisty stuff you'll crave either a smaller AR or more capacity to bring it on earlier. Normal street driving, well to be honest, youll be thinking the same things. Like i said, in an environment where the car is flowing from corner to corner without losing too much speed you'll love it. What sort of power are you realistically going to be seeing from the car after its run in and tuned?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/274597-t04z-like/#findComment-4655867
Share on other sites

GT3582R would be a better "big single" for a stock 26 but it will be exciting... once it comes on boost

Far from stock :P

Yes, I did start the previous thread, not trying to revive it.. Didn't post it in the forced section because I have completed all my research and know what to expect "Spec" wise.. there is only so much "specs" can tell you.. This thread was more of a gimme the warm sensation details... You don't spend so much time, effort & money to just wait for it.. Like I said it's getting sooner to completion and im getting excited..

Looking for 420+ and will see how much leeway is in it to get more, but not overly fussed.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/274597-t04z-like/#findComment-4655903
Share on other sites

Was going to post this in the forced induction section, but I doubt "story telling" will be favoured by the mod's.

Car's been off the road for the good part of a year (September).

Built motor (standard capacity), .84 t04z & fair bit of weight-loss .. looking for 400+ kw.

Yet to score a ride in a t04z powered R, or anything single turbo'd to match (been in a t88).

So if any owner's want to share their experience's..

How it feels, adrenaline factor, how it come's on etc etc.... Just trying to butter myself up for the future.. Shouldn't be much more then a month away.. Great deal of time, money & sleep less nights involved during the build up... Hope it lives up to my expectations :thumbsup::):banana: me up..

Tomek

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bRR_aisRgPI...feature=related

WHAT IS THAT BOV SOUNDS AWESOME!!!!! could anybody plz tell me :D:D:D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/274597-t04z-like/#findComment-4656746
Share on other sites

What was this car doing atw before the rebuild?

Got a basic list of parts for the build?

This part is the worst of it all, well to be honest the worst part is the night before its first power run :)

The car was making 237.9kw (Didn't have access to an 4wd dyno) The engine was running fine when it was removed, we decided to pull it out when we couldn't remove one of the high pressure line bolts on the turbo system, lol.. it was only meant to be a budget freshen up, (pistons, bearings, gaskets, n1 pumps) but it scaled up quickly.

05U block 20 thou over HKS pistons, eagle rods, 33 crank, Trust pump, acl bearings, HKS gaskets

worked head, new everything.. 262 cams, greddy cam gears

Ross balancer, trust oil cooler + relocater, cooling pro 100mm cooler, trust radiator, n1 water pump

2x 044 pumps + standard as lift, surge tank, 800cc injectors, nismo fuel reg

jjr coil packs + HKS twin spark

Link G4 controlling the show

Im sure their is more i've missed, but pretty much every corner is seen to and did my best to not skimp on parts.. standard box atm..

It was sent down to Advan, who did the machining :) It has all the little tricks to keep it reliable (orifice, drain, sump)

worst part being? worrying it will pop? shit yeah :P

Edited by Tomek
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/274597-t04z-like/#findComment-4657345
Share on other sites

The car was making 237.9kw (Didn't have access to an 4wd dyno) The engine was running fine when it was removed, we decided to pull it out when we couldn't remove one of the high pressure line bolts on the turbo system, lol.. it was only meant to be a budget freshen up, (pistons, bearings, gaskets, n1 pumps) but it scaled up quickly.

05U block 20 thou over HKS pistons, eagle rods, 33 crank, Trust pump, acl bearings, HKS gaskets

worked head, new everything.. 262 cams, greddy cam gears

Ross balancer, trust oil cooler + relocater, cooling pro 100mm cooler, trust radiator, n1 water pump

2x 044 pumps + standard as lift, surge tank, 800cc injectors, nismo fuel reg

jjr coil packs + HKS twin spark

Link G4 controlling the show

Im sure their is more i've missed, but pretty much every corner is seen to and did my best to not skimp on parts.. standard box atm..

It was sent down to Advan, who did the machining :happy: It has all the little tricks to keep it reliable (orifice, drain, sump)

worst part being? worrying it will pop? shit yeah :D

Some good stuff in there.

Dont worry about the stock box, mines on the stock box with a stupidly short shifter and i work it through the gears - just dont miss 3rd and it should be fine :cool:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/274597-t04z-like/#findComment-4659393
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
×
×
  • Create New...