Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

My car is being prepared to CAMS 3E (Production Car) regs, the same as Mark's car.

Basically it has to run no more than the N1 spec, so n1 turbs are ok (but out of my price range so I'll stay stock), brembo brakes, upgrade oil and water pumps. Suspension, exhaust and puter are unrestricted. Tyres are no larger than N1 spec (245) and have to be yokohama A032rs. Pretty basic spec really :P

  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

My car is being prepared to CAMS 3E (Production Car) regs, the same as Mark's car.

Basically it has to run no more than the N1 spec, so n1 turbs are ok (but out of my price range so I'll stay stock), brembo brakes, upgrade oil and water pumps.  Suspension, exhaust and puter are unrestricted.  Tyres are no larger than N1 spec (245) and have to be yokohama A032rs.  Pretty basic spec really :D

OK so it is a N1 spec GTR with bigger turbo's. Do you know what power it makes?

Duncan are you geting or have a GTR now? Marks car, who?

Give me a call when you can.

row row row your boat gently down the.....................

Sorry, wrong thread :D

The GTR's are coming for you John

Good I hope they do as too many shoulda guna meetings. I hope to see more out there, not just beer talk.

Gary Burchet who owns three R32 GTR's and put the best of all three into his Targa GTR. He is very keen to rub my nose right in it, at our next track day. It is N1 spec and he has a Hollinger sequential in it so should have a big go.

Big target on my Slot Car.

if marks r32gtr n1 can peal of a low 47 imagine what it could do with some slicks???

what is happening to your gtr druncan i hope you left it in some good hands lol

lolololololololol

and the r31 is on the road so it must be time to find my kaggs and go for a drive

pete

yeah, I picked up a cheap 91 gtr to race, fatz is currently ripping it to pieces to race prep it. Can't wait to get it out on the track, I did 3 laps in Mark's car the other day and it was beautifully balanced.

Mark Hawkins has finished prepping his car, thats the one I'm talking about, its racing in combined touring in the NSW champs this year as well as having a shot at targa. No n1 turbs at this stage, just the stock ones.

Its great to see some competition out there John, keep stirring everyone up :D

row row row your boat gently down the.....................

Sorry, wrong thread :D

The GTR's are coming for you John

now thats really funny :wassup:

If dodgy Mcgill can get his act together and finish our stage 3/cams testing, another GTR should be out around May to have some fun.

Duncan,

Do they have a class of racing for crap drivers with modded cars??

lol doughboy, I was going to say Supercars :D

TrustGTR if you're serious about giving it a go, its really easy to get started, super sprints are cams organised trials around a track, results are based on your time compared to other cars in your class. Thats what we ran in last Sunday.

  • 4 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...