Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Well technically the engine in your car has 1.998 litres so you fall outside the range unfortunately.

You must also love that piece of shit 2 litre 6 cylinder engine in the Eunos 30X.

Wow :O some one has sand in their vag!

Anyway, recently I have read a lot of info on inline 6's and the more I read about them the more I like them. Especially the way they are balanced with crankshaft design. It seems a bit disappointing how BMW in the new M3 have gone to a 4.0L V8... kind of hor the GTR went to a V6 :(

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/275466-inline-6/page/3/#findComment-4680578
Share on other sites

  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

i love the sound of skylines (oddly enough i prefer the sound of the rb25 over a 26), and i really like the sound of the ford 'barra' turbo (xr6t motor) as they sound a lot like a rb, but beefier, but there is one breed of engine that gets me harder than chinese algerbra and it isn't a 4, 6 or 8 cylinder.........

lamborghini exhaust note ftmfw!!! either their v10 or v12.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/275466-inline-6/page/3/#findComment-4680641
Share on other sites

"i love the sound of skylines (oddly enough i prefer the sound of the rb25 over a 26)"- Ever since swapping from RB25 Stagea to a GTR I have been thinking a similar thing..

Inline 6 love for me started with an old 4.2 LPG Patrol, "Hmmm, turning right at a round about, 4th gear should do it," and with a set of extractors and a big zorst on it, it sounded sweet.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/275466-inline-6/page/3/#findComment-4694166
Share on other sites

So people do realise the BMW are dropping all in line 6s next model range. Ditto Ford, Merc and Holden already doing so. Nobody is making straight 6s. Does anybody actually make an all alloy straight 6? Didnt think so for pretty obvious reasons. Even the M engines are all cast iron blocks

I can live with the death of the straight 6 if all the replacements are 2.5-4.0L V10s and :) But they wont be so it just sux

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/275466-inline-6/page/3/#findComment-4694436
Share on other sites

So people do realise the BMW are dropping all in line 6s next model range. Ditto Ford, Merc and Holden already doing so. Nobody is making straight 6s. Does anybody actually make an all alloy straight 6? Didnt think so for pretty obvious reasons. Even the M engines are all cast iron blocks

I can live with the death of the straight 6 if all the replacements are 2.5-4.0L V10s and :yes: But they wont be so it just sux

umm..... holden did it about 20 years ago........

but v6's aren't all bad. remember that the new gtr has one

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/275466-inline-6/page/3/#findComment-4695255
Share on other sites

umm..... holden did it about 20 years ago........

but v6's aren't all bad. remember that the new gtr has one

And people say GM are behind, but look at everyone playing catch up on the V engine game :yes:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/275466-inline-6/page/3/#findComment-4695452
Share on other sites

And people say GM are behind, but look at everyone playing catch up on the V engine game :D

GM are behind hence why they are in position they are in, trying to keep their head above water. If you looked at their financial position years ago they were miles ahead of Ford, however Ford had a lot more money tied up in R&D which may have helped...

Back OT, it sucks everyone is going the V mainly due to reasons of packaging especially in performance cars, I think it is a poor compromise. I think BMW dropping the inline especially in their performance models is a real shame!

F**k it lets just all buy a TVR Tuscan S!!!!!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/275466-inline-6/page/3/#findComment-4695782
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...