Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 477
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Marko how is the Nitto oil pump going for you? What sort of oil pressures do you see hot?

- on cold start up it is over 6bar

- warm idle it is 4bar

- normal driving it is just over 6bar

- when i push gets close to 8bar

HEAPS of pressure on hand :P great for the main & big end bearings!

i am 'thinking' of upgrading the rear housings on my -10's (i probably wont be arsed yet its good to know anyway)...anyone have experience in running .86's in a twin (or single) configuration as i would liek to determine the power gain & fitment challenges as below:

- the requirement for customised dumps

- i was advised that .86 rear housing is more suited for single applications & that it might become too laggy (i dont want lag but maybe i can get away with it on a 3ltr)

- i wasnt sure if there would be adequate room & clearance to run the larger turbos in a low mount position?

here is the website, shows .86 option but no technical specs:

http://www.turbobygarrett.com/turbobygarre...R_707160_10.htm

i am 'thinking' of upgrading the rear housings on my -10's (i probably wont be arsed yet its good to know anyway)...anyone have experience in running .86's in a twin (or single) configuration as i would liek to determine the power gain & fitment challenges as below:

- the requirement for customised dumps

- i was advised that .86 rear housing is more suited for single applications & that it might become too laggy (i dont want lag but maybe i can get away with it on a 3ltr)

- i wasnt sure if there would be adequate room & clearance to run the larger turbos in a low mount position?

here is the website, shows .86 option but no technical specs:

http://www.turbobygarrett.com/turbobygarre...R_707160_10.htm

You dont think they would be a little big for the street? Run E85 then if you still want more (you nutbag) then go the bigger housings?

i am 'thinking' of upgrading the rear housings on my -10's (i probably wont be arsed yet its good to know anyway)...anyone have experience in running .86's in a twin (or single) configuration as i would liek to determine the power gain & fitment challenges as below:

- the requirement for customised dumps

- i was advised that .86 rear housing is more suited for single applications & that it might become too laggy (i dont want lag but maybe i can get away with it on a 3ltr)

- i wasnt sure if there would be adequate room & clearance to run the larger turbos in a low mount position?

here is the website, shows .86 option but no technical specs:

http://www.turbobygarrett.com/turbobygarre...R_707160_10.htm

You dont think they would be a little big for the street? Run E85 then if you still want more (you nutbag) then go the bigger housings?

You dont think they would be a little big for the street? Run E85 then if you still want more (you nutbag) then go the bigger housings?

E85 isn't a bad idea but the inconvenience will definitely do my head in.

With the larger housings I do question the possible lag and clearance issues, anyone know what they are rated at with .82s?

i fitted the new plugs & splitfires - runs like a dream & seems to hit harder all around :down:

i know its probably better for the coil packs to run without the valley cover as they probably get more air ventilation, is this more apparent on the track though as mine is a street car (and the valley cover adds bling to the engine bay :P)

yep you should run the largest gap you can without missfiring, bigger spark = better burn = more power. 1.1 is ideal but many people gap them down as low as .8 under larger boost

Hi guys,

When i 1st ran my car over the weekend with my new coil packs & new plugs bcpr7es (gap 0.8mm) it was fine at the time but i only drove it for 10min. I started the car again last night & right from the onset on idle it was carrying on, coughing, very rough & could barely reverse it on flat ground so i let it run for about 10min & the idle slowly became cleaner but as soon i revved it the engine was extremely rough.

I checked the plugs & they were black like powder charcoal – very rich!

I then put my pfr7a’s (1.1mm gap) back in & the problem was fixed, drove it for an hour with no issues 

I am trying to sum up a conclusion as to the cause...both plugs run the same temp sooo it must be the gap right?

As u suggest Duncan, the larger the gap the stronger the spark & better fuel burn? It was tuned with pfr7a’s @ 1.1mm gap.

I am guessing that if i regapged my bcpr7es @ 1.1mm they would be fine.

  • 2 weeks later...

hi guys,

i had my gtr on the dyno for a quick health check & i asked about my exhaust (steve N1GTR prompted me on this, damn you mate im gona go broke hehe). im currently running a hks superdrager which is 3.25inch at the front, then steps to 3.5inch mid way & finished with 3.75inch at the diff.

my tuner told me if i wanted more power to increase size & run x-force front pipes (2 x 3inch pipes which collect into a 3.5inch) then with a new 4inch all the way thru to the rear.

he told me i should expect 20awkw gain or more as the larger capacity rb26/30 really doesn't like back pressure :ermm:

1 of his customers cars made more than 20awkw. where does it end haha

Thats exactly what Racepace told me when I asked them about building me a mines style front pipe with a 450awkw goal with my new engine. Bummer was that they couldnt make the pipe for me without me sending the car down to them though, seeing as all systems are custom made to fit.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...