Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 477
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Marko how is the Nitto oil pump going for you? What sort of oil pressures do you see hot?

- on cold start up it is over 6bar

- warm idle it is 4bar

- normal driving it is just over 6bar

- when i push gets close to 8bar

HEAPS of pressure on hand :P great for the main & big end bearings!

i am 'thinking' of upgrading the rear housings on my -10's (i probably wont be arsed yet its good to know anyway)...anyone have experience in running .86's in a twin (or single) configuration as i would liek to determine the power gain & fitment challenges as below:

- the requirement for customised dumps

- i was advised that .86 rear housing is more suited for single applications & that it might become too laggy (i dont want lag but maybe i can get away with it on a 3ltr)

- i wasnt sure if there would be adequate room & clearance to run the larger turbos in a low mount position?

here is the website, shows .86 option but no technical specs:

http://www.turbobygarrett.com/turbobygarre...R_707160_10.htm

i am 'thinking' of upgrading the rear housings on my -10's (i probably wont be arsed yet its good to know anyway)...anyone have experience in running .86's in a twin (or single) configuration as i would liek to determine the power gain & fitment challenges as below:

- the requirement for customised dumps

- i was advised that .86 rear housing is more suited for single applications & that it might become too laggy (i dont want lag but maybe i can get away with it on a 3ltr)

- i wasnt sure if there would be adequate room & clearance to run the larger turbos in a low mount position?

here is the website, shows .86 option but no technical specs:

http://www.turbobygarrett.com/turbobygarre...R_707160_10.htm

You dont think they would be a little big for the street? Run E85 then if you still want more (you nutbag) then go the bigger housings?

i am 'thinking' of upgrading the rear housings on my -10's (i probably wont be arsed yet its good to know anyway)...anyone have experience in running .86's in a twin (or single) configuration as i would liek to determine the power gain & fitment challenges as below:

- the requirement for customised dumps

- i was advised that .86 rear housing is more suited for single applications & that it might become too laggy (i dont want lag but maybe i can get away with it on a 3ltr)

- i wasnt sure if there would be adequate room & clearance to run the larger turbos in a low mount position?

here is the website, shows .86 option but no technical specs:

http://www.turbobygarrett.com/turbobygarre...R_707160_10.htm

You dont think they would be a little big for the street? Run E85 then if you still want more (you nutbag) then go the bigger housings?

You dont think they would be a little big for the street? Run E85 then if you still want more (you nutbag) then go the bigger housings?

E85 isn't a bad idea but the inconvenience will definitely do my head in.

With the larger housings I do question the possible lag and clearance issues, anyone know what they are rated at with .82s?

i fitted the new plugs & splitfires - runs like a dream & seems to hit harder all around :down:

i know its probably better for the coil packs to run without the valley cover as they probably get more air ventilation, is this more apparent on the track though as mine is a street car (and the valley cover adds bling to the engine bay :P)

yep you should run the largest gap you can without missfiring, bigger spark = better burn = more power. 1.1 is ideal but many people gap them down as low as .8 under larger boost

Hi guys,

When i 1st ran my car over the weekend with my new coil packs & new plugs bcpr7es (gap 0.8mm) it was fine at the time but i only drove it for 10min. I started the car again last night & right from the onset on idle it was carrying on, coughing, very rough & could barely reverse it on flat ground so i let it run for about 10min & the idle slowly became cleaner but as soon i revved it the engine was extremely rough.

I checked the plugs & they were black like powder charcoal – very rich!

I then put my pfr7a’s (1.1mm gap) back in & the problem was fixed, drove it for an hour with no issues 

I am trying to sum up a conclusion as to the cause...both plugs run the same temp sooo it must be the gap right?

As u suggest Duncan, the larger the gap the stronger the spark & better fuel burn? It was tuned with pfr7a’s @ 1.1mm gap.

I am guessing that if i regapged my bcpr7es @ 1.1mm they would be fine.

  • 2 weeks later...

hi guys,

i had my gtr on the dyno for a quick health check & i asked about my exhaust (steve N1GTR prompted me on this, damn you mate im gona go broke hehe). im currently running a hks superdrager which is 3.25inch at the front, then steps to 3.5inch mid way & finished with 3.75inch at the diff.

my tuner told me if i wanted more power to increase size & run x-force front pipes (2 x 3inch pipes which collect into a 3.5inch) then with a new 4inch all the way thru to the rear.

he told me i should expect 20awkw gain or more as the larger capacity rb26/30 really doesn't like back pressure :ermm:

1 of his customers cars made more than 20awkw. where does it end haha

Thats exactly what Racepace told me when I asked them about building me a mines style front pipe with a 450awkw goal with my new engine. Bummer was that they couldnt make the pipe for me without me sending the car down to them though, seeing as all systems are custom made to fit.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...