Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

When i first bought my skyline, i knew that petrol consumption would be a bit higher than what i was driving around (a mirage... and yes i know).

So over the past 3/4 weeks of owning the car ive managed to decrease my fuel consumption by quite a decent amount.

So here's my tips:

1: Dont hit boost (obvious, but ill explain more further down)

2: Right fuel

3: Easier driving

4: Winding out the gears

5: Using the brakes (More about caring for your car)

Now, most of you guys would know that not hitting boost can save ALOT of petrol, but what some people dont know if more vacuum pressure can also alter consumption,

and as probably everyone knows that a turbo runs off exhaust gas. If you for example, take off from a set of lights, and get top 60km/h in 4 or 5 seconds, you are going to be using more petrol than someone who would take 7 or 8 seconds.

On that note also, winding out the gears can also save you some dosh. Alot of people tend to think lower revs = less fuel used. This may be arguable but i definitely think it doesn't.

If you slowly wind out the gears to say 4500 RPM's, then due to the little amount throttle position and little amount of exhaust gas and pressure being produce, you can make it to 4500RPM without even hitting boost. Yes it will take you a little longer to get up to the speed limit, but who cares, most people take between 7 or 8 seconds to get to the speed limit. Tried to avoid stop start driving (i know this is a obvious one, but it makes a difference)

Right fuel can be one of the big winners. Even thought most of us would own similar skylines, each skyline is different in the tiniest possible way. And the difference in which petrol can make a BIG DIFFERENCE. If your mates recommend Caltex's Vortex 98, then give it a go, but dont stick with it if your not gaining anything. Its a matter of finding the right petrol that your car will like, not what a mate may recommend. Find the petrol that your car likes, and it does make a significant difference.

When slowing down, alot of people tend to using engine braking to do most of their braking. (that was a sh*t sentence lol)

Whilst this is also arguable, this is more a tip for looking after your car. What ever way you slow down, your wearing out parts of the car. People who using engine brakng are actually wearing down their engine and gearbox. Same with using the brakes, but when you look at it, a new set of brakes is alot cheaper than a new gearbox or tranny.

PLEASE NOTE:

These are my own tips and tricks i have been using, and since ive bought the car to now, ive manged to drop it from 12.5L/100km to 10L/100kms. If people do disagree with what ive said then yes do please speak up, but ive taken the time to try and provide some tips for people who are trying to save some cash.

Buckets out.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/280316-fuel-consumption-tips/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 72
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Some good points there but the only thing I disagree with is that people use the engine gearbox to slow down because its safer then braking whilst out of gear, + if your brakes fail a least your in gear and the engine torque will help slow the car a little bit.

A 2nd hand gear box would be similar price to a new set of (good) brakes & rotos anyway.

Im sure the wear it causes would be minimal on the engine and gearbox anyway and the injector duty is always 0% when your foots off the accelerator coming down the revs. so you wont save any more fuel either way. You would just put more strain on the brakes and wear them out faster without the use of the engine. Just my 2 cents :)

yes the driver is the biggest difference in fuel consumption.

about the engine braking, wouldn't it wear out the clutch most of all? Unless its auto of course lol.

and if you double clutch to save clutch wear, theres the lil bit of fuel used to get the engine revs up to match the lower gear... Surely its not much fuel but i wonder how much it would affect the overall consumtion?

Good points all of them BUT I'd seriously rather sell the skyline and buy a corolla than drive timidly and think about fuel all the time. It's a sports car, if you can't afford the fuel maybe stick to something less sporty.

Some good points there but the only thing I disagree with is that people use the engine gearbox to slow down because its safer then braking whilst out of gear, + if your brakes fail a least your in gear and the engine torque will help slow the car a little bit.

A 2nd hand gear box would be similar price to a new set of (good) brakes & rotos anyway.

Im sure the wear it causes would be minimal on the engine and gearbox anyway and the injector duty is always 0% when your foots off the accelerator coming down the revs. so you wont save any more fuel either way. You would just put more strain on the brakes and wear them out faster without the use of the engine. Just my 2 cents :thumbsup:

yes the driver is the biggest difference in fuel consumption.

about the engine braking, wouldn't it wear out the clutch most of all? Unless its auto of course lol.

and if you double clutch to save clutch wear, theres the lil bit of fuel used to get the engine revs up to match the lower gear... Surely its not much fuel but i wonder how much it would affect the overall consumtion?

Whilst it is generally safer using gears to slow down, alot of people do this in a manner that damages their gearbox, clutch and engine. I recommend braking in gear until about 1500rpm before changing down to the next gear - this is much easier on the gearbox synchros, clutch and engine than downchanging at 2500rpm+ like I see alot of people doing. Better yet, double clutch it down...this will preserve your synchros indefinitely and is much better for your engine. A huge problem with downchanging at high rpm is you are letting the road control the speed of your engine, sending momentum in the reverse direction by spooling the engine up using the clutch. This is damaging particularly to the valvetrain and in some circumstances you can see compression lock up from it which can create a driving hazard in itself. It uses sweet buggerall petrol to double clutch because the engine has no load in neutral...I do it all the time when changing down and my fuel economy isn't bad at all.

Aiming for the best fuel economy is always going to be a balance between paying for petrol and paying for mechanical repairs. For example, too many people use overdrive 5th at inappropriate speeds. Saves them a little bit of fuel but then they have to shell out for another gearbox down the track when the teeth get stripped off the gear. Second hand gearboxes are very lucky dip too...sometimes there is a reason they are being sold and you can't test the thing until it's in your car.

100% agree with Delta Force. Buy a sports car and take everything that goes with it including the expense...

Great tips Callum.

I've just started seeing how low I can get my consumption by driving very conservatively.. just as an experiment.

I think it's a matter of self control most of the time too.. other drivers take off from the lights and pass me looking over with a "why do you drive that car and go so slow" look. But it doesn't bother me :thumbsup:

Anyway, I was averaging 13.5L/100km and when driving with fuel economy in mind, I managed to get 12.4 and 11.16.

I think driving style and keeping an eye on traffic ahead so you can keep momentum and minimise your start/stop driving helps dramatically.

I'm going to keep my experiment going for a few tanks to see how far I can wind out from a fill.. my goal is 500km from a tank without running out empty. I don't think I'll make it haha.

thanks for everybodys 2cents, givea me some more ideas! :thumbsup:

one more thing i forgot to add, i've found that staying in 3rd gear while doing 60km/h does alot better than 4th gear at 60.

Most engines have it written somewhere in there ecu, what is known as a cruising speed. This speed and RPM rate is where all of the engine components work to the most postential.

From what ive found (dont quote me but) 3000RPM seems to be the cruising speed for a skyline. Well my skyline anyway. And in 3rd at 60, it sits just on 3000RPM

So if im crusing along a flat peice of road, ill now do 60 in 3rd instead of in 4th. I find that this eliminates any sortof engine struggle, by keeping the RPM at this rate.

Also, because there is very little throttle position, so there is no/little boost or vacuum pressure being created. Saving you on fuel and making you should like your flying past!

Buckets out

i get around 500+ ks out of nearly every tank it's not hard . mine is a r33 auto standed boost a free flowing exaust / pod filter/and fmic if i dont get around 500ks out of a tank i get shitty lol . bp 98 my car seems too like best

if you do quite lengthy driving at higher speeds cruise controll is a must

it eliminates (well reduces) small fluctuations in the throttle which chew up fuel like twitches of the foot, and when you speed up to over 100 then back off and speed up again, it all helps

+ it prevents fatigue

also when accelerating (mostly in more underpowered na cars but the principle remains) if you are accelerating sometimes it is better to feed in throttle rather than planting it, open throttle means more fuel and more air but the engine can only use so much + it avoids overfueling and suffocating the engine giving better accelleration

some of these are obvious but there are lots of people who are completely oblivious to how to get the most out of all their cars both in economy and performance.

If you want a good engine RPM to cruise at in any car, get your car dynoed and going by the chart stick to an RPM range where you engine is developing a nice spread of torque.

As a general rule of thumb in manual Skylines...cruising along a flat road you are safe anywhere from 2000-2500 without putting too much pressure on engine and drivetrain components, as there is plenty of torque being developed here. Uphill I would maintain 2500-3000 depending on incline. And downhill you can be safe from 1500-2000rpm.

i get around 500+ ks out of nearly every tank it's not hard . mine is a r33 auto standed boost a free flowing exaust / pod filter/and fmic if i dont get around 500ks out of a tank i get shitty lol . bp 98 my car seems too like best

Haha it's hard for me.. my car is tuned fairly rich and even on a long trip along the Hume to Sydney my car would've struggled for 500 I think, I filled up before being able to see how far I would have gotten and wasn't keeping figures back then.

I use Synergy8000, seems to make the car feel more responsive to me.. maybe it's just in my mind though!

That's what a higher octane will do more than anything, particularly in a standard car: make an engine feel smoother and more responsive. So you're spot on with that one :D

Octane is a rating given to the fuel's knock resistence, not its ability like many believe to combust differently

in a standard car which is built to run on 91 octane there will be no difference as the motor will not make any use of the octane unless you up compression or advance timing.

why you engine feels better and you get more mileage out of it is down to the fact it is more refined and their is less other crap in it

response is due to the additional timing it can run

for more modern cars or those tuned and built for use with pulp or >95 octane, ecu's take advantage of this knock resistence and often automatically wind in more timing, or in many cases just dont retard it.

this extra few degrees in timing often leads to greater fuel consumption.

the brand of fuel and where you get it from does play a huge role in how your car reacts as there may be moisture or foreign chemicals within the fuel which your car doesn't like. big servos with a high turn over are often the best to grab fuel from, the fuel is often "fresher" and there has been less time for foreign content contamination with it sitting.

just some more useless shit i have stashed away in my brain looking for a place to vent. :P

Edited by 910trx
That's what a higher octane will do more than anything, particularly in a standard car: make an engine feel smoother and more responsive. So you're spot on with that one :P

Haha yeah, I meant Synergy8000 felt better to me compared to Vpower and BP Ultimate.. they just feel a tad more sluggish when I try them in my car.

Octane is a rating given to the fuel's knock resistence, not its ability like many believe to combust differently

in a standard car which is built to run on 91 octane there will be no difference as the motor will not make any use of the octane unless you up compression or advance timing.

why you engine feels better and you get more mileage out of it is down to the fact it is more refined and their is less other crap in it

response is due to the additional timing it can run

for more modern cars or those tuned and built for use with pulp or >95 octane, ecu's take advantage of this knock resistence and often automatically wind in more timing, or in many cases just dont retard it.

this extra few degrees in timing often leads to greater fuel consumption.

the brand of fuel and where you get it from does play a huge role in how your car reacts as there may be moisture or foreign chemicals within the fuel which your car doesn't like. big servos with a high turn over are often the best to grab fuel from, the fuel is often "fresher" and there has been less time for foreign content contamination with it sitting.

just some more useless shit i have stashed away in my brain looking for a place to vent. :P

I didn't say it would combust differently! I just said it feels smoother and more responsive - a direct consequence of the concepts you have explained here (which I already knew of) :D

I do disagree however, that there will be no difference to engines designed to run on 91. Even though they are tuned for 91 they can still experience detonation from time to time (particularly in older vehicles) and higher octane petrol can stage this off better. 98 octane petrol also has a longer shelf life than 91 and greater resistance to contamination, which makes a difference if the car is seldom driven.

Hmm, some unusual ideas here.

Firstly you wont strip 5th gear cruzing on light throttle at any speed....no pressure on the gear set or main shaft.

Selecting a gear to run at a lower rpm is the preferred method to save fuel, that means short shifting, ie getting to the next gear ASAP.

Where it works against you is if you lug the engine, ie the engine speed is so low that its fighting and pinging its self to death....there is a balance, low revs, light throttle...need to go quicker, then gear down and wind it out a little.

Treat the right pedal like there is a egg under your foot, yes keep it off boost, watch the gauge, you want it as far into the negative scale as possible, whenever possible. Dont on the gas, off the gas, hold it steady like a balancing act, light small adjustments to hold your speed.

Read the traffic ahead, if you see cars stopped at the lights ahead, get off the right pedal early and let the momentum get you there while the speed washes off, you will save using the brakes as much too.

Keep you tire pressures up, to the high side, it reduces rolling resistance and saves fuel. Dont go overboard, 40 psi and your tires will wear more in the center, i run 34 psi.

Keep weight down....get all that junk out of the boot, run with 20 ltrs of fuel rather than a full tank, 40 ltrs weighs quite a bit.

Besides when you do need to give it the boot, being lighter = quicker. :D

Edit; almost forgot the most important thing...keep it tuned, spark and air filters must be clean.

Edited by GTRPSI

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Next on the to-do list was an oil and filter change. Nothing exciting to add here except the oil filter is in a really stupid place (facing the engine mount/subframe/steering rack). GReddy do a relocation kit which puts it towards the gearbox, I would have preferred towards the front but there's obviously a lot more stuff there. Something I'll have to look at for the next service perhaps. First time using Valvoline oil, although I can't see it being any different to most other brands Nice... The oil filter location... At least the subframe wont rust any time soon I picked up a genuine fuel filter, this is part of the fuel pump assembly inside the fuel tank. Access can be found underneath the rear seat, you'll see this triangular cover Remove the 3x plastic 10mm nuts and lift the cover up, pushing the rubber grommet through The yellow fuel line clips push out in opposite directions, remove these completely. The two moulded fuel lines can now pull upwards to disconnect, along with the wire electrical plug. There's 8x 8mm bolts that secure the black retaining ring. The fuel pump assembly is now ready to lift out. Be mindful of the fuel hose on the side, the hose clamp on mine was catching the hose preventing it from lifting up The fuel pump/filter has an upper and lower section held on by 4 pressure clips. These did take a little bit of force, it sounded like the plastic tabs were going to break but they didn't (don't worry!) The lower section helps mount the fuel pump, there's a circular rubber gasket/grommet/seal thing on the bottom where the sock is. Undo the hose clip on the short fuel hose on the side to disconnect it from the 3 way distribution pipe to be able to lift the upper half away. Don't forget to unplug the fuel pump too! There's a few rubber O rings that will need transferring to the new filter housing, I show these in the video at the bottom of this write up. Reassembly is the reverse Here's a photo of the new filter installed, you'll be able to see where the tabs are more clearing against the yellow OEM plastic Once the assembly is re-installed, I turned the engine over a few times to help build up fuel pressure. I did panic when the car stopped turning over but I could hear the fuel pump making a noise. It eventually started and has been fine since. Found my 'lucky' coin underneath the rear seat too The Youtube video can be seen here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uLJ65pmQt44&t=6s
    • It was picked up on the MOT/Inspection that the offside front wheel bearing had excessive play along with the ball joint. It made sense to do both sides so I sourced a pair of spare IS200 hubs to do the swap. Unfortunately I don't have any photos of the strip down but here's a quick run down. On the back of the hub is a large circular dust cover, using a flat head screw driver and a mallet I prised it off. Underneath will reveal a 32mm hub nut (impact gun recommended). With the hub nut removed the ABS ring can be removed (I ended up using a magnetic pick up tool to help). Next up is to remove the stub axle, this was a little trickier due to limited tools. I tried a 3 leg puller but the gap between the hub and stub axle wasn't enough for the legs to get in and under. Next option was a lump hammer and someone pulling the stub axle at the same time. After a few heavy hits it released. The lower bearing race had seized itself onto the stub axle, which was fine because I was replacing them anyway. With the upper bearing race removed and the grease cleaned off they looked like this The left one looked pristine inside but gave us the most trouble. The right one had some surface rust but came apart in a single hit, figure that out?! I got a local garage to press the new wheel bearings in, reassemble was the opposite and didn't take long at all. Removing the hub itself was simple. Starting with removing the brake caliper, 2x 14mm bolts for the caliper slider and 2x 19mm? for the carrier > hub bolts. I used a cable tie to secure the caliper to the upper arm so it was out of the way, there's a 10mm bolt securing the ABS sensor on. With the brake disc removed from the hub next are the three castle nuts for the upper and lower ball joints and track rod end. Two of these had their own R clip and one split pin. A few hits with the hammer and they're released (I left the castle nuts on by a couple of turns), the track rod ends gave me the most grief and I may have nipped the boots (oops). Fitting is the reversal and is very quick and easy to do. The lower ball joints are held onto the hub by 2x 17mm bolts. The castle nut did increase in socket size to 22mm from memory (this may vary from supplier) The two front tyres weren't in great condition, so I had those replaced with some budget tyres for the time being. I'll be replacing the wheels and tyres in the future, this was to get me on the road without the worry of the police hassling me.
    • Yep, the closest base tune available was for the GTT, I went with that and made all the logical changes I could find to convert it to Naturally Aspirated. It will rev fine in Neutral to redline but it will be cutting nearly 50% fuel the whole way.  If I let it tune the fuel map to start with that much less fuel it wont run right and has a hard time applying corrections.  These 50% cuts are with a fuel map already about half of what the GTT tune had.  I was having a whole lot of bogging when applying any throttle but seem to have fixed that for no load situations with very aggressive transient throttle settings. I made the corrections to my injectors with data I found for them online, FBCJC100 flowing 306cc.  I'll have to look to see if I can find the Cam section. I have the Bosch 4.9 from Haltech. My manifold pressure when watching it live is always in -5.9 psi/inHg
    • Hi My Tokico BM50 Brake master cylinder has a leak from the hole between the two outlets (M10x1) for brake pipes, I have attached a photo. Can anyone tell me what that hole is and what has failed to allow brake fluid to escape from it, I have looked on line and asked questions on UK forums but can not find the answer, if anyone can enlighten me I would be most grateful.
    • It will be a software setting. I don't believe many on here ever used AEM. And they're now a discontinued product,that's really hard to find any easy answers on. If it were Link or Haltech, someone would be able to just send you a ECU file though.
×
×
  • Create New...