Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all.

I have searched but cant seem to find a answer.

I am building a RB30/25, using RB25 oilpump, and 1.5mm restrictors to the RB25 head.

On the exhaust side of the RB30 block there is a oil out. I will be using that to feed my GT4084R turbo.

Do i need a oil restrictor before the GT4094R? Or should i just hook it up and leave it using the built in restrictor in the Gt4094R?

Also, there is only one oilreturn in the block, can i hook up, turbo drain, std head drain, and extra head drain to that using a T peice.. (Not T, but with 3 fittings. You get the picture)

Thank you.

Edited by nissan200sx.dk
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/285663-oil-restriction/
Share on other sites

Nissan ran 2 restrictors. One at the block and another at the inlet of the turbo.

GCG I believe supply turbo's with an additional restrictor. I reused the factory restrictor at the block on my old GT30 setup and will again be using a restrictor for the new setup.

Its not wise to T in to the turbo's oil drain.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/285663-oil-restriction/#findComment-4797379
Share on other sites

Adriano. Block will be cleaned very good.

Rest:

Garret specify 40 - 45 psi oil pressure on max engine speed, and say"For many common passenger vehicle engines, this generally translates into a restrictor with a minimum of 0.040" diameter orifice upstream of the oil inlet on the turbocharger center section" And I should always check that this is correct.

Info from garrett here: http://www.turbobygarrett.com/turbobygarre...r/faqs.html#t16

So i need to mount oil pressure gauge for that when running my engine?

I would prefer not to weld in the sump. So i will drill and tap 2 x 10mm holes in block. Both used as return for oil from the head. Will use the std hole in block for turbo return.

Thank you.

Edited by nissan200sx.dk
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/285663-oil-restriction/#findComment-4803668
Share on other sites

Huh? No restrictor at all?? I know there is one in the turbo, but I should fit no extra?

This is from Garrett's wesite.

"Ball-bearing turbochargers can benefit from the addition of an oil restrictor, as most engines deliver more pressure than a ball bearing turbo requires. The benefit is seen in improved boost response due to less windage of oil in the bearing. In addition, lower oil flow further reduces the risk of oil leakage compared to journal-bearing turbochargers. Oil pressure entering a ball-bearing turbocharger needs to be between 40 psi and 45 psi at the maximum engine operating speed. For many common passenger vehicle engines, this generally translates into a restrictor with a minimum of 0.040" diameter orifice upstream of the oil inlet on the turbocharger center section. Again, it is imperative that the restrictor be sized according to the oil pressure characteristics of the engine to which the turbo is attached. Always verify that the appropriate oil pressure is reaching the turbo"

I will be using RB25 oil pump, with hydraulic 24 valve head fitted with 2 x 1.5mm oil restrictors to the head from block. And 1.5mm restrictor for the VCT valve that will have it own hose. (Drilled in the head, and coming from side of block)

I have NO idea how much flow the oil pump makes with this setup. I have oil pressure for engine and can fit oil pressure for turbo also if needed to make sure. I dont want to blow my brand new GT4094R. hehe

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/285663-oil-restriction/#findComment-4803872
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • 98 r34 gtt Been rocking my latest setup and car running like never before. Have put a good 200 miles on it since all the latest changes and additions. everything is dialed in and have been driving it a bunch.   However, all a sudden last weekend as soon as I pushed throttle passed 4k and the engine stumbles, (slow or fast acceleration) hesitates and doesn’t go above 4100 or so, like a misfire. Everything else seems fine. I had a “good” set of coil packs that I removed from car when I first got it when I changed them over to new coils. I swapped out current ones for those, but no change. I also changed the plugs, no change. Seems to rev over 4 when out of gear with no load just fine no “misfire”, but as soon as its in gear with a load of any kind, it “misfires” as soon as rpm drop back below 4 k it runs perfectly, smooth, starts, restarts and drives fine as long as I keep it below 4 k while in gear. All readings look fine, no CEL   Any idea as to what could all a sudden cause an issue when pushing rpms passed 4 k?
    • When you say your cams are 272/262 is that 272in and 262ex?
    • We're arguing semantics. I am saying 45 accel and a 55 deccel ramp are "2 ways". Even a 45 degree ramp and an 89 degree ramp is "2 ways", because it is literally... two ways. The cusco 55/30 ramp is a 2 way. It's two ways. I get it though - in normal nomenclature a "2 way" would be 45/45 or 55/55 or 60/60 i.e the same locking in both directions. And something like 45/65 would be considered "1.5 way". I would then say if we're getting into the nitty gritty then every locking diff is a "2 way" diff and we should not speak in 1.5, or 2 ways but ramp angles instead. Which ofc if one of those ramp angles is 90deg, that side is not doing any locking. :p So Nismo don't obviously sell 3 things. The fact of the matter that they only sell two items really goes to show that there's a 2 way and a "1,5 way" which is really a 1 way. I believe the actual lockup for the 'adjustability' of the GT pro is really just setting preload for when the ramps actually start locking up. It's not changing how much 'wayness' there is. It is (somehow) horribly explained. People just buy whatever diff and go "locks up good bruh" and that's what ends up on socials forever.  
    • No, you're wrong, and you've always been wrong about this. The Nismo has 2 sets of openings. One is a real 2-way, and the other is a 1-way. There is no 1.5-way possible with the ramps that they offer. A real 1.5-way does exist. That Cusco stuff I posted is a prime example. If the forward drive ramps are, say 55°, and the overrun ramps are, say, 30°, then you will get about half as much LSD effect on overrun than you do on drive. It is real, it realy works. OK, you're slightly right. The Nismo has 55° and 45° ramps on the 2-way, so it does offer less LSD effect on overrun. But, I think that just means that they've (probably) sensibly established that you do not want actually equal LSD effect on overrun. You just want "quite a lot, but not quite as much as the drive LSD effect".
×
×
  • Create New...