Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Motor have run their annual tyre test, this year the results seem to be more relevant to us....they tested 18' performance tyres ;)

Tests were dry stopping, wet stopping and wet and dry lap times of a track at DECA.

Results:

DL - Dry Lap

DS - Dry Stop 100-0km/h

WL - Wet Lap

WS - Wet Stop 80-0km/h

Goodyear Eagle F1 WL 16.54s, WS 38.1m, DL 45.32s, DS 39.6m, Avg Price $462

Bridgestone Potenza Re040 WL 16.92s, WS 41.3m, DL 44.79s, DS 44.5m, Avg Price $413

Dunlop SP Sport 9000 WL 16.83s, WS 37.8m, DL 46.49, DS 46.1m, Avg Price $485

Pirelli P Zero Nero WL 17.02s, WS 34.7m, DL 46.09s, DS 42.7m, Avg Price $491

Falken GRB FK451 WL 17.21s, WS 32.4m, DL 45.36, DS 37.7m, Avg Price $383

Toyo Proxes T1-S WL 17.13s, WS 44m, DL 45.53s, DS 40.3m, Avg Price $411

Hankook Ventus Sport K104 WL 17.23s, WS 34.5m, DL 45.16s, DS 39.6m, Avg Price $333

Michelin Pilot Sport WL 17.32s, WS 38.8m, DL 44.83s, DS 43.2s, Avg Price $589

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/28744-which-tyres-motor-magazine-test/
Share on other sites

And which tire did they award the winner?

They didn't have a "winner" as such, but interestingly the second cheapest tyre, falken fk451, was best in both wet and dry braking tests.

The guys at motor seem to say you cant go past the Hankooks, which is a good thing since they are the cheapest tyre there.

That was how i read it. Being a tight ass and all :cheers:

Even though the website says they have a shitload of sizes in the k104 they only seem to have 18s and some 17s atm though.

Melb (dunno about other states) has a Goodyear tyre deal - buy 4 for the price of 3...

Picked up a set of Goodyear Eagle F1 GSD3 - $245/each x 3 + $40 4w align = $775.

These German made GSD3s are substantially better than the Thailand made GSD2 - with improvements made in all aspects of the tyre too!

Otherwise I probably would have settled for the cheaper Kuhmo 712s @ 190each but then would have to buy 4...

In Jan 2003 motor mag ran their annual tyre test on the top 13 performance tyres

1) Dunlop Formla FM901 cost $1150

2) Pirelli P Zero Nero cost $1320

3) Bridgestone Potenza S-03 cost $1180

4) Goodyear Eagle F1 GS-D3 cost $1516

5) Firestone SZ50 cost $884

6) Hankook Ventus K104 $688

7) Michelin Pilot Preceha $1350

8) BF Goodrich Profiler G $1140

9) Avon ZZ3 $940

10) Toyo Trampio GU:WN $892

11) Simex SM9300 $700

12) Kumho ECSTA Supra712 $780

13) Federal 589 $632

Fooey that list above is from the last test of which the Michelin Preceda's won. I have been using them for around 6mths and they are fantastic.

I guess i'll have to take a read of the latest Motor Mag during my lunch break on Monday to read over this latest set of tests.

Just got a set of Michelin Pilot sports on the car today;

235/40/18

265/35/18

still scrubbing them in, but they seem excellent under braking. they squeal a bit, but i think that is just the silicon coat of the new tyre wearing off

Don't know about the tests in the first post, as far as I can see they all lapped more than twice as fast in the wet as they did in the dry and they all stopped quicker in the wet than the dry, seems just a little odd???

The thing I find funny I've tried top line tyres and cheaper (use more for bunrouts ) lower range tyres and find the Falkens and slighlty cheaper ones to be crap in the wet. Mind you I have to say, rear tyres don't last but my question why 80-0km/h in the wet test and not a 100-0km/h test. ?

Don't know about the tests in the first post,  as far as I can see they all lapped more than twice as fast in the wet as they did in the dry and they all stopped quicker in the wet than the dry, seems just a little odd???

Me thinks the collumns got shifted in the translation. I had Bridgestone Potenzas on my SSS which I liked. Choice magazine did a test that included them and hey actually had the same stopping distance in the wet and the dry and in the dry they were I think 2nd best.

haha, I think I got the columns the right way around? The wet and dry tracks were different, wet was much shorter from memory. And the dry braking test was from 100, the wet from 80 :D

  • 2 weeks later...

My last set of tyres were the Yokihama 539's. I thought they were great, really progressive at and beyond the limit of traction without any nasty characteristics. I also measured 1g cornering with an accelerometer around the big round about at the end of Centenary highway and Ipswich Rd.

I've now upped the anti with a set of Bridgestone R compound RE540S, now they have grip. Reduced my lap times by over 2secs.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
×
×
  • Create New...