Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Is it actually possible to crash this car? I would have thought this would be one of the more difficult cars to actually try and prang, it's that good. :P

Unless of course someone tries to have buttsecks with it at the lights in a 3 tonner.

Edited by Racing Otaku
Is it actually possible to crash this car? I would have thought this would be one of the more difficult cars to actually try and prang, it's that good. :cool:

Unless of course someone tries to have buttsecks with it at the lights in a 3 tonner.

not the actual accident. but its pretty funny in a way but also really horrible

Edited by R34P3R

Here are the photos that started the rumor, the e-mail came through saying a 19yo kid had taken his dads R35 for a spin and hit a bridge in Sydney... But the cars in the background suggest that is a lie, clearly American

post-26910-1253577527_thumb.jpg

post-26910-1253577537_thumb.jpg

you mean the white one that got rear ended in Perth today?

it was hit by a 3 tonne truck

It looks good too :D nice big rear end smashhhh! a big crease on the passenger rear 1/4 drivers side is ok kinda.

should buff out easily :)

All only 985 klms young!

Bargain!

Here are the photos that started the rumor, the e-mail came through saying a 19yo kid had taken his dads R35 for a spin and hit a bridge in Sydney... But the cars in the background suggest that is a lie, clearly American

Fark, whatever the case, that thing was absolutely hauling when the driver had a brain fart.

Here are the photos that started the rumor, the e-mail came through saying a 19yo kid had taken his dads R35 for a spin and hit a bridge in Sydney... But the cars in the background suggest that is a lie, clearly American

That will buff right out...

Here are the photos that started the rumor, the e-mail came through saying a 19yo kid had taken his dads R35 for a spin and hit a bridge in Sydney... But the cars in the background suggest that is a lie, clearly American

The photos in this post are of a US crash that happened in Texas.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
    • @GTSBoy yeah sorry i know thery are known for colors bud those DBA are too in colors 🙂 Green will be good enough for me  
×
×
  • Create New...